Rude replies

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
aka@ said:
WMDs ring a bell? Saddam being connected to 9/11 ring a bell? Saddam being
connected to Al Queda ring a bell? Do you think there is nothing wrong with
bombing the crap out of thousands of innocent civilians?

Yep, I read it in the paper, listened to it on CNN, but I've seen the
satellite images of convoys of trucks leaving Iraq for Syria for months
before we went in - Did you miss that?

There are other reasons I believe it was justified, but you don't want
to change your opinion, so I won't bore you with what I think.
 
Leythos said:
Yep, I read it in the paper, listened to it on CNN, but I've seen the
satellite images of convoys of trucks leaving Iraq for Syria for months
before we went in - Did you miss that?

Bullshit. If that were true, it would have come out at any number of senate
committee meetings, etc. Even if true, which it isn't, a convoy of trucks
does not WMDs make.
There are other reasons I believe it was justified, but you don't want
to change your opinion, so I won't bore you with what I think.

That's because killing people based on a pack of lies is never justified
unless, of course, you're a fascist like you. The USA has no special mission
to proclaim themselves the policemen of the world and only end up being the
bully of the world and the Osama bin Laden's fodder for recruitment. His is
up. Your Bully's is down. Why is that?

While your head was *ringing*, you must have missed this part of my reply:
I also agree with not giving any rights to terrorists - sometimes you
have
to do what's not politically correct to protect your country.

That's what Hitler said about the Jews, gypsies and gays. Not only isn't it
"politically correct" but it isn't morally or ethically correct and it goes
against the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights.

Alias
 
Leythos said:
I think you've missed the people that have been "detained" by foreign
countries/governments in non-US countries for decades, but I don't
expect you to speak out against foreign countries.

Okay, I have watched this thread as it has unfolded. I spent nearly 30
years in the military. I served in Vietnam (2 tours), got out, and then
re-entered. I also fought in the "first" Gulf war in 1991. I have a little
bit of background and knowledge that will allow me to speak to some of the
issues being discussed here.

First and foremost, the persons being detained in Gitmo, in Afghanistan, and
in other detainee camps are *NOT* U. S. citizens, and therefore are not
directly entitled to any of the rights that come with a birthright in the
United States. The persons being held (for the most part) are enemy
combatants, and while not technically prisoners of war, they are due only
the legal protection that the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the
Geneva Convention afford them. We do not owe them air conditioned
condominiums grade quarters. We owe them nothing more than what they are
being given. Get over it. Those that are determined to be not enemy
combatants will be released. Until then, they are treated as enemy
combatants. Get over it.

Those individuals that we have detained will not be beheaded. Those
individuals that we detain will not be taken into the streets and shot.
Those individuals that we detain will not wind up having their remains
tossed into a garbage dump or a schoolyard. They will be fed. They will
get better medical treatment than they received prior to their capture.
Many will get the first dental treatment of their lives. Many will get
treatment for diseased and conditions that would have gone untreated had
they not been detained. They are de-loused (and trust me, they need it).
They are kept in better conditions than they were probably living in before
their capture...I have seen how the "average" Iraqi and Afghani lives, and
trust me you would not believe it.

Many, and I dare say most, of those being detained are fanatics who are
being manipulated. Most would take any and every opportunity to kill anyone
not aligned with their sect/jihad/etc. Most are uneducated, unhappy, and do
not see the b*llsh*t being fed to them by their religious and political
leaders. Most are uneducated enough to believe that being martyred will
lead to the land of Milk and honey with servants and virgin girls...
Most are dirt poor and willing to sacrifice their lives for the few measly
dollars that the jihad promises to their families. Many do not care if they
live or die...many believe that if they die and kill Americans or Sunnies or
Shi'ites or whatever, they will be rewarded.

Meanwhile, the f*ucked up liberal press attacks the military for
everything it does. Here you have Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines who
risk their lives to do what their government has asked them to do...yet we
hold them to an antiquated system, unrealistic rules of engagement , and the
glaring spolight of a hostile press. They are up against an enemy that
knows no rules, and has no limits. Perhaps the Israelis have it right...but
the liberal pukes in the U.S. will never allow our military to effectively
deal with the situation in Iraq and Afghanistan, and will cause the efforts
to fail. Then the liberal a**holes will claim that it failed because the
military was weak and wrong and mismanaged, when it is the actions of the
liberals in the press and in the government that will cause the failure of
the programs in those countries.

You are not required to believe that we have a reason to be there. You
have the right to question what the motives of our government are. You have
the right to criticize openly, in a forum just such as this, the actions of
the government and the military. Yet it is those same Soldiers, Sailors,
Airmen and Marines who are giving their lives, their limbs, their freedoms,
to ensure that you can sit on your fat a** back at home and make pig noises
about it.

Criticize the government. Criticize the press. Criticize the fact that we
have not accomplished our goals in either Afghanistan or Iraq. But never
criticize the troops that are there. Unless you have been there, you have
no clue what it is like. Unless you have been through what they are going
through, you have no clue. No clue at all. You can't sit back an "imagine"
what it's like. You can't sit back and "speculate" on what it is like.
Therefore, you have no reasonable perspective.

There are many fine men and women who have died in Afghanistan and Iraq.
Sadly, there will be many more before the job it through. Instead of
sitting at your keyboard discussing it in a forum like this, send e-mails to
your congressman..your state senator...the legislators on Capitol Hill.
Make your views known. Use the rights that have been granted to you by the
Constitution and the blood of those that have died in the name of freedom.
But never attack or belittle those souls brave enough to take up the
gauntlet and serve in this time of need. They deserve no less. They are
just doing their "job"; they are just doing what they are "told to do".
They have volunteered to put themselves in harms way. They are doing a job
that most of those reading this post do not have the courage or the
conviction to do. Honor them.

Bobby
 
Leythos said:
Yep, I read it in the paper, listened to it on CNN, but I've seen the
satellite images of convoys of trucks leaving Iraq for Syria for
months before we went in - Did you miss that?

Break out the tin-foil caps boys! Yeah I've heard a lot of Rightards
claim they saw those convoys. And thousands upon thousand claim they've
been abducted by aliens!
There are other reasons I believe it was justified, but you don't want
to change your opinion, so I won't bore you with what I think.

Let's get all touchy-feely over saving the Iraqis from Saddam! Of
course it was you Rightards that gave Clinton the most sh*t about
protecting Kosovo from the Serbs! Ya'll care more about stained blue
dresses than saving people from tyranny!

The Bush Admin was more concerned in saving Halliburton from bankruptcy
than saving any Iraqi from Saddam!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
| Thank You Bobby and I really mean that ;-)
|
|

One hundred and twenty two replies and counting, let's see how
long we can keep this thread going...nowhere : - (
 
Leythos said:
I think you've missed the people that have been "detained" by foreign
countries/governments in non-US countries for decades, but I don't
expect you to speak out against foreign countries.

LOL! Your expectations about me would be wrong.

And because other countries do it doesn't make it right for us to do it
too!

I say we send that doctor-shopping pill-popping loudmouth Rush to Egypt
to be held indefinitely with out due process!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
NoNoBadDog! said:
Okay, I have watched this thread as it has unfolded. I spent nearly
30 years in the military. I served in Vietnam (2 tours), got out,
and then re-entered. I also fought in the "first" Gulf war in 1991. I
have a little bit of background and knowledge that will allow me to
speak to some of the issues being discussed here.

First and foremost, the persons being detained in Gitmo, in
Afghanistan, and in other detainee camps are *NOT* U. S. citizens,
and therefore are not directly entitled to any of the rights that
come with a birthright in the United States.

I believe that the Supreme Court differs with you opinion.
The persons being held
(for the most part) are enemy combatants, and while not technically
prisoners of war, they are due only the legal protection that the
Uniform Code of Military Justice and the Geneva Convention afford
them.

Then why aren't we allowing the Red Cross in to check out conditions
there?
We do not owe them air conditioned condominiums grade
quarters. We owe them nothing more than what they are being given.
Get over it. Those that are determined to be not enemy combatants
will be released. Until then, they are treated as enemy combatants.
Get over it.

Nope, not until they been charged, and tried.
Those individuals that we have detained will not be beheaded.

Some have died in our custody. How many? Who really knows.
Those
individuals that we detain will not be taken into the streets and
shot. Those individuals that we detain will not wind up having their
remains tossed into a garbage dump or a schoolyard. They will be
fed. They will get better medical treatment than they received prior
to their capture. Many will get the first dental treatment of their
lives. Many will get treatment for diseased and conditions that
would have gone untreated had they not been detained. They are
de-loused (and trust me, they need it). They are kept in better
conditions than they were probably living in before their capture...I
have seen how the "average" Iraqi and Afghani lives, and trust me you
would not believe it.

LOL! Well if it is so bad, let's save some money and ship them back to
live in much worse conditions!
Many, and I dare say most, of those being detained are fanatics who
are being manipulated. Most would take any and every opportunity to
kill anyone not aligned with their sect/jihad/etc. Most are
uneducated, unhappy, and do not see the b*llsh*t being fed to them by
their religious and political leaders. Most are uneducated enough to
believe that being martyred will lead to the land of Milk and honey
with servants and virgin girls... Most are dirt poor and willing to
sacrifice their lives for the few
measly dollars that the jihad promises to their families. Many do
not care if they live or die...many believe that if they die and kill
Americans or Sunnies or Shi'ites or whatever, they will be rewarded.

Been like that for millenia. Detaining a few hundred will not change
anything except convince a hundred-fold more to take their place.
Meanwhile, the f*ucked up liberal press attacks the military for
everything it does. Here you have Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and
Marines who risk their lives to do what their government has asked
them to do...yet we hold them to an antiquated system, unrealistic
rules of engagement , and the glaring spolight of a hostile press.

Have you heard about how hard it is for recruiters lately? No one wants
to send their kids to die for no good reason.
They are up against an enemy that knows no rules, and has no limits.

Yeah, you're right. Does that mean we have to give up ours?
Perhaps the Israelis have it right...but the liberal pukes in the
U.S. will never allow our military to effectively deal with the
situation in Iraq and Afghanistan, and will cause the efforts to
fail.

Iraq was doomed from the start.
Then the liberal a**holes will claim that it failed because
the military was weak and wrong and mismanaged, when it is the
actions of the liberals in the press and in the government that will
cause the failure of the programs in those countries.

Mismanaged definitely, but most by the civilian leadership that didn't
put enough troops on the ground to win the peace.

Our troops were put in a no-win situation, unlike the first Iraqi War,
of even Kosovo. Bush, Cheney, and Rummy are to blame, not our boys and
girls on the front lines! Sure there are some bad seeds, like in Abu
Ghraib, but our boys and girls in the field have been given an
impossible task, and that isn't their fault.
You are not required to believe that we have a reason to be there.
You have the right to question what the motives of our government
are. You have the right to criticize openly, in a forum just such as
this, the actions of the government and the military. Yet it is
those same Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines who are giving their
lives, their limbs, their freedoms, to ensure that you can sit on
your fat a** back at home and make pig noises about it.

Well, if they never went over there, I dare say, that we would still be
sitting on our fat asses and making pig noises. And that's the shame of
it all. Osama is still on the loose, and Iraq was one least likely
country to do us any harm.
Criticize the government. Criticize the press. Criticize the fact
that we have not accomplished our goals in either Afghanistan or
Iraq. But never criticize the troops that are there.

Who was criticizing the troops? Seriously! I have yet to see on post
in this thread denegrate our troops in the slightest. I've been
criticizing the Bush administration over denying detainees their due
process.
Unless you
have been there, you have no clue what it is like. Unless you have
been through what they are going through, you have no clue. No clue
at all. You can't sit back an "imagine" what it's like. You can't
sit back and "speculate" on what it is like. Therefore, you have no
reasonable perspective.
There are many fine men and women who have died in Afghanistan and
Iraq. Sadly, there will be many more before the job it through.
Instead of sitting at your keyboard discussing it in a forum like
this, send e-mails to your congressman..your state senator...the
legislators on Capitol Hill. Make your views known. Use the rights
that have been granted to you by the Constitution and the blood of
those that have died in the name of freedom. But never attack or
belittle those souls brave enough to take up the gauntlet and serve
in this time of need. They deserve no less. They are just doing
their "job"; they are just doing what they are "told to do". They
have volunteered to put themselves in harms way. They are doing a
job that most of those reading this post do not have the courage or
the conviction to do. Honor them.

I do. It's the civilian leadership that I have a problem with. I
really don't know why you even brought this up though, since no one here
had said anything dishonoring our boys and girls in uniform.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
MarcD said:
One hundred and twenty two replies and counting, let's see how
long we can keep this thread going...nowhere : - (

This ain't nothing!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
Yep, I read it in the paper, listened to it on CNN, but I've seen the
satellite images of convoys of trucks leaving Iraq for Syria for months
before we went in - Did you miss that?

Now you should have told the government that. Instead you let them go into
Iraq, when you knew all along they were going to the wrong place and should
have gone to Syria instead to find those WMDs... What kind of patriotism is
that? :)

Gerhard
 
I can accept that answer - thanks for providing it.

You're welcome... at least /some/ common ground :)
I have no reason to believe they are not there for valid reasons.

One reason I have is that they have, even after such long a time, not been
charged with any wrongdoing.
I don't believe that the children/wife of a terrorist is exactly innocent
when they are aware of what the terrorist is doing. I believe that you
don't have to pull the trigger to be guilty, only assist in any number
of ways - even providing food/shelter is aid to the enemy and should be
dealt with strongly/swiftly.

See, here you're getting somewhere... The various US governments have been
actively involved in all kinds of terrorist movements and activities
throughout the last 50 years. Does that make all citizens terrorists?
If I disagreed with my government I might not give them the benefit of
what I believe is the correct action. [...] I believe we are doing the
right thing, even if it's not sitting well with all the bleeding heart
types and the tin-hatters.

That's a lot of "believing". For me, "believing" is a thing for religion.
In politics and government, I'm a fan of transparency and being held
responsible. The thing is, you don't know what they are doing, because they
are doing it in secret. So how can you say you agree or disagree -- unless
you agree with not knowing what they are doing?
I'm part of a number of "groups" and I believe that if those groups were
considered radical or terrorist in nature, that I would stop being part
of them or turn in the leaders of the groups that caused them to be a
threat to the government

That's irrelevant. You still seem to "believe" that all the detainees are
there because they have been actively involved in criminal activities, and
seem to "believe" that the government would act always justly, and you seem
to believe that the principle of "checks and balances" is really a silly
thing and that the executive branch of the government is good enough to
determine who should be locked up. Well, we just have to agree to disagree
here. I believe in the necessity of "checks and balances" and that the
three branches need to control each other -- and that the government as a
whole needs the control by the people.
Now, if the government was picking up people because they reached the age
of 30 and decided to terminate them, well, I would strongly oppose the
action to my fullest ability.

Do you know of the criteria why people are locked up? I suspect you don't.
What makes you believe they are any better? (And it can't be more than
"believing" -- which I already said that for me it should stay in the realm
of religion, and out of government.)
Based on where I've been in the world, what I've seen, what I still get
intel on, I believe in our prior and current mission.

Depending on where you want to get... it sure isn't targeted on ending
terrorism. (Your "intel" might tell you that :) There's more terrorism now
than there was before. And growing. Where I come from, you need to face the
results of what you do; intentions (even if they were good) don't count
that much.
Ask one of the terrorists whey they "hate" Americans - you won't find
that as a reason in the top 10 they list.

That's not the issue. What they believe is pretty irrelevant -- most of
them live a live few in the "developed world" can imagine, and are easy
victims for all kinds of propaganda -- if it can get strong enough. The
issue is how they got to believe what they believe. And that's something
you seem not capable of understanding.
I've been to their embassy, talked with several members of the royal
family, never saw anything wrong with their business practices as
related to what I was involved with.

Well, if supporting a Saudi-type government is your thing, I think we can
end the conversation right here. This is a hard-core dictatorship, and the
blindness on this eye of quite a number of US citizens is exactly the
reason why for a large part of the world the biggest threat currently is
the USA. That's not because of some silly anti-Americansm that they got
born with, it's because a lot of people in the US government over the past
50 years have shown exactly this attitude you are presenting, without even
having a clue what they are telling the others with that.

Sorry... you're probably lost. Not sure there's a way to recovery.

Gerhard
 
"The Downing Street Memo are actually minutes from a meeting that occurred
in Britain months before the Iraq War started. Richard Dearlove (´C¡), the
head of Britain's spy agency MI6 had reported in this meeting on his recent
visit with Bush. The authenticity of the memo is not in question, as
England and a US Administration official have verified that it is indeed
wholly accurate. The parts which are quite telling are:

"C reported on his recent talks in Washington. There was a perceptible
shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable. Bush wanted
to remove Saddam, through military action, justified by the conjunction of
terrorism and WMD. But the intelligence and facts were being fixed around
the policy. The NSC had no patience with the UN route, and no enthusiasm
for publishing material on the Iraqi regime's record. There was little
discussion in Washington of the aftermath after military action.

"The Defence Secretary said that the US had already begun "spikes of
activity" to put pressure on the regime. No decisions had been taken, but
he thought the most likely timing in US minds for military action to begin
was January, with the timeline beginning 30 days before the US
Congressional elections.

"It seemed clear that Bush had made up his mind to take military action,
even if the timing was not yet decided. But the case was thin. Saddam was
not threatening his neighbours, and his WMD capability was less than that
of Libya, North Korea or Iran. We should work up a plan for an ultimatum to
Saddam to allow back in the UN weapons inspectors. This would also help
with the legal justification for the use of force.

"The Prime Minister said that it would make a big difference politically
and legally if Saddam refused to allow in the UN inspectors. Regime change
and WMD were linked in the sense that it was the regime that was producing
the WMD. There were different strategies for dealing with Libya and Iran.
If the political context were right, people would support regime change.
The two key issues were whether the military plan worked and whether we had
the political strategy to give the military plan the space to work."
 
Gerhard said:
Now you should have told the government that. Instead you let them go
into Iraq, when you knew all along they were going to the wrong place
and should have gone to Syria instead to find those WMDs... What kind
of patriotism is that? :)

Gerhard

The kind you hear on Fox News, or read in the Washington [Moonie] Times,
or on the WorldNetDaily website, that covers up for all the lies and
mistakes of the Bush Administration.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
kurttrails daddy must be locked up there :-) Only explanation why he would
want more terrorists running the streets??

George
 
kurttrail,

They will let your daddy out eventually maybe :-)

BTW, if someone is in a war zone with a gun does that make them an enemy?
You are an intelligent human being, at least according to you you are,
answer the question smart guy.

George
 
kurttrail said:
LOL! Your expectations about me would be wrong.

And because other countries do it doesn't make it right for us to do it
too!

I say we send that doctor-shopping pill-popping loudmouth Rush to Egypt
to be held indefinitely with out due process!

I say we send kurttrail's sorry excuse for an American there!! All agree
say "I"! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I . It's unanymous. see you kurtrail :-)

kurtrail we don't have to let your daddy out as he shouldn't have been there
with a gun in his hand.....do you even realise that you are arguing for
TERRORIST?

George
 
George said:
kurttrails daddy must be locked up there :-) Only explanation why he
would want more terrorists running the streets??

My father will have been dead for a 1/4 century come September.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
<snip>

No one could have said this any better than you have. Please allow me to
take this time to thank you for your service, we are indebted to the men and
women who serve.
 
George said:
kurttrail,

They will let your daddy out eventually maybe :-)

Really? "They" can raise the dead?!
BTW, if someone is in a war zone with a gun does that make them an
enemy?

If that war zone is in their country that makes them defenders of their
family, friends, and country.

My "enemy" are the mother-effers that were involved in 911. And where
is Osama again?
You are an intelligent human being, at least according to you
you are, answer the question smart guy.


I did. If they were captured in a war zone, then they are prisoners of
war, and are entitled to be held under the protections of the Geneva
Convention.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top