Adam Albright said:
You forgot to say "this is a recording". Apparently the only thing
that can pentrate your thick skull is a stray gamma ray or two every
once in awhile. <wink>
Did it ever occur to you a lot of people come to newsgroups like this
to read about other people's experiences with Vista and base their
decision on if or not to upgrade now on what other problems other
people are having? Guys that post nothing but Vista is wonderful,
nothing wrong with it, you can't get it to work like I did, means your
nuts, or oh, oh, get new drivers are mostly ignored or just played
with like I'm playing with you. <giggle>
I do come to this group to see what kind of issues others are having before
I consider buying any version of it. I am not one to run out and get the
latest OS when my current one works fine.
I see a few people having significant issues, a number of trolls, and most
of the issues being minor problems that should be fixed with driver updates.
Microsoft does not have the source code for drivers. This was a problem for
them when they had to write their own drivers just for one set of hardware
to get a single version of their first 64 bit OS running for a demo. They
cannot write the drivers for every piece of hardware out there. There are
so many different pieces, so each manufacturer is responsible for their own,
and they don't care to put resources into making new drivers until the
"finalized" version of the OS is released. Upgrade Advisor should tell you
if your PC is capable of running Vista, not if it will run well or if all
your peripherals ie. Leythos' wireless NIC would work. A lot of devices did
not work properly under previous Windows versions on their initial release.
Require people to buy new hardware? What's new about that? Most people had
to upgrade their PCs, at least for more RAM, when Windows 95 was first
released.