Adam Albright said:
If you have "no problems" that suggests your
hardware and software is different than what people having problems
have installed in their system. If this gets too tough for you to
follow along, just let me know.
Wow, there's a "no shit" statement for you! What part of this have you NOT
been following along with? Drivers, drivers, drivers!!!! You need to learn
what those are. I've specifically built Vista capable machines. I have
machines that can run Vista just fine. So OF COURSE I'm running different
"software" then those that don't work. Thanks for stating the obvious!
You make that determination by staring into your crystal ball or do
you rely on tea leaf reading?
No, I base that on the fact that HE mentioned having nothing but THE BEST
Intel hardware. Damn dude, you really need to follow along better. Wake
up!
You further show your ignorance by
claiming Vista can only run Vista compatible software. Not true. I'm
running several Windows 3.1 vintage software applications.
I never said any such thing. This is a prime example of you reading "A" yet
thinking "B". I mentioned what a person needs to do to make sure they don't
run into any problems. So you have fun with your Windows 3.1 applications!
The point here which you utterly failed to realize is that Vista is meant to
run Vista software. It was designed to be backwards compatible but not 100%
backwards compatible. So anyone bitching and moaning because their existing
app doesn't work just needs to wait for that THIRD PARTY to deliver a fix.
Are you able to keep up with that?
Kid, you just keep blowing smoke out your ass.
Entertaining yes, but rather foolish if you want to keep what little
creditiblity you got left.
That smoke must be coming out of your own ass based on your disillusionment
proven in the above response. Also, please refrain from day dreaming about
my ass you perve!