I know that both Win XP and Win 2000 Pro use NTFS. Yet both of these
O/Ses seem to have very few differences, and both lack important
features (for example comparing two files). So, how does one justify
upgrading to WinXP from Win 2000 Pro? I have yet to find an
application that won't run on Win 2000.
In all honesty you should also ask this question in the win2000 group, I
think you would getter a better view also from the opposite side and not
a side that would favor XP.....In my experience with the 2 OS's I'd say
it all depends on what you need it for. Sure, if basic email, surfing
the web, new browser, media player (whoooopeeee) and silly looking
desktops is what you think is important than the eye candy is there in
XP. I for one am not impressed with its cd burning or built in Firewall
& driver database.
To a very average user this may all be impressive in XP and I don't
knock it but to establish a real comparison I think the level of your
windows experience & usage should also be noted. I for one still use
Win2K Pro & find it **rock** solid in all areas I use it for. Relience
on 3rd party software is heavy in my arena of use & so far everything I
have thrown at Win2K works exceptionally well, my XP install on the
otherhand had a meltdown & I have no time for stupid searching of fix
solutions. Win2K has rarely, if ever, given me any trouble in the
stability department and I run the latest softwares & hardware and build
my own machines....
Anotherwords, to each his own.