[OT] Installing Linux the easy way

M

mike ring

UseLinux are selling distros at £1.20 per CD:
http://www.uselinux.co.uk/

I guess so - it's usually an impulse thing at the Newsagents - "oh, look,
another Linux disk, perhaps I can kick out Windoze at last."

But I've never found one that worked fully.
Or you can download them for actually free.

Yup, Ubuntu sent me a nice two-disc set - I was well impressed, but they
didn't install any more than the magazine version
Surely you troll, sir.

Now this sounds like a linux group; I've been flamed no enda times in
those, I've learned not to ask questions there.

I understand that laptops are apt to create
problems, and if you have esoteric or very old hardware, then there
may be problems.
No, nice new Shuttle box.

BTW, my post was intended to be a humourous response to Susan's method;
I've found a GSOH to be essential when trying linux (laugh for fear of
weeping!)

mike
 
E

El Gee

The last two cost money. I bought Red Hat 5 (??) many years ago - but
I would never pay for a distro again (unless they cost a nominal
amount like you see on some websites). I've purchased from UseLinux in
the past, and think they are a good bet for those on poor internet
connections, or those that simply can't be arsed with the downloads.
Plus, you can also often buy "bundles" from them, which is a whole
wodge of distros for less that £20. Not that I would necessarily do
that any more.

Plus, I suspect that Xandros or Linspire are too "sugary" for my
tastes, and I doubt that I'll ever have the inclination to try them
out; although maybe grandma will love it. Maybe one of these days I'll
try OpenSolaris - although methinks Sun is getting in on the action a
bit late in the game.

Xandros has a "free" edition. I downloaded it and tried it, but did not
like the way you were limited in upgrades (it is semi-crippled).

Linspire can be downloaded free with a coupon code. It was very simple
to install but cripple much like Xandros. Both are simple to set up for
Windows people, but Linux folks will not like either distro.

I have been using Ubuntu for a little over a year now (on a total of 3
machines ... all of the old and the only issues I have had are the ones
I create when I experiment without backing up :). Two of the machines
it is install on are HP Omnibooks (650 amd 700 mhz) and the third is a
400 mhz Celeron server that is rock solid.

I have not tried "Open Solaris" but I did try Solaris for X86...I am not
doign that again. Far to difficult and drivers are no fun.

I will stick with Ubuntu, but I understand that it is not for everyone.
Just my .02 (US) worth. YMMV.

--
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
El Gee // www.mistergeek.com <><
Know Christ, Know Peace - No Christ, No Peace
Remove .yourhat to reply
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 
D

David

These days mostly they're teaching me. (I'm glad they still think I'm
capable of learning.) ;)

Susan

Sometimes I despair. I think my kids are pigheaded ... probably just
like me. ;-)}}}
--
David
Remove "farook" to reply
At the bottom of the application where it says
"sign here". I put "Sagittarius"
E-mail: justdas at iinet dot net dot au
 
K

k

the best linux distro is called windows XP SP2...

oh with small problem.. its not linux crap!
 
J

JP Loken

På Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:49:39 +0100, skrev Susan Bugher
Knoppix, KDE desktop/shell(?) (I think). ;) The rationale was that KDE
is the most Windows-like interface - therefore the easiest to start with.

Susan

Mandriva is also a Windows-like distro that is easy to start up with for
Windows-folks.
 
S

Susan Bugher

J

John Hood

JP said:
På Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:49:39 +0100, skrev Susan Bugher



Mandriva is also a Windows-like distro that is easy to start up with
for Windows-folks.
Agreed JP. I spent three weeks looking for a good Linux distro,
determined not to use Mandriva because it was "too easy." Guess what I
used?

John H.
 
M

Mark Carter

Susan said:
Could be. . . Pigheaded-ness seems to be a *very* dominant gene (I
passed it down to all the offspring). ;)

A nice quote I read recently:
Insanity is hereditary. You get it from your kids.
 
R

Renan

At date Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:12:18 -0600, El Gee
([email protected]) wrote in article
for newsgroup said:
I have not tried "Open Solaris" but I did try Solaris for X86...I am not
doign that again. Far to difficult and drivers are no fun.

Solaris x86 never was, and never will be, for the desktop user. (and not
for servers either: Sun doesn't recommend x86 Solaris for production
servers. ¹).
I understand that it can be useful for someone that wants to learn how
to work on it, or develop on it, but don't want to buy an expensive Sun
machine.

I hope that this picture changes with Open Solaris.
I remember that there are rumors about a OpenSolaris "distribution" much
like the Linux ones. Anybody confirms this?

Just my $0.02.

¹ I understand that Sun wants to sell hardware based on their technology
(SPARC)... don't tell me this :)
 
G

Gary R. Schmidt

Renan said:
At date Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:12:18 -0600, El Gee
([email protected]) wrote in article
<[email protected]>, for newsgroup
alt.comp.freeware:




Solaris x86 never was, and never will be, for the desktop user. (and not
for servers either: Sun doesn't recommend x86 Solaris for production
servers. ¹).
I understand that it can be useful for someone that wants to learn how
to work on it, or develop on it, but don't want to buy an expensive Sun
machine.

I hope that this picture changes with Open Solaris.
I remember that there are rumors about a OpenSolaris "distribution" much
like the Linux ones. Anybody confirms this?

Just my $0.02.

¹ I understand that Sun wants to sell hardware based on their technology
(SPARC)... don't tell me this :)

Well, I have Solaris 10 running on my old Duron and my newer laptop.
Okay, I'm not a typical user as I've been a UNIX developer for 25 years.

Works like a dream, for me, at least. But then I _know_ how I want my
computers to work.

There are at least 6 "distributions" of Open Solaris,
<http://www.opensolaris.org> is a good starting place.

Cheers,
Gary B-)
 
C

Chris Lee

At date Mon, 26 Dec 2005 22:44:14 +0000, Mark Carter
([email protected])


Only thing I hated in most Linux distros, is that they don't come
with
audio/video codecs. (but this can easily be installed)
The only distro that came with those was (IIRC) Slackware.


Who gives a shit what ASSES like you hate or don't hate?

Linux is not being developed for WINDOWS WAREZ HOUNDS like you.

Get over yourself.
 
C

Craig

Chris said:
Who gives a shit what ASSES like you hate or don't hate?

Linux is not being developed for WINDOWS WAREZ HOUNDS like you.

Get over yourself.

y.a. reason that I've stopped contributing in a lot of Linux n.g.'s.

Craig
 
E

Ed

On 12/27/2005 JP Loken wrote:

-> På Tue, 27 Dec 2005 17:49:39 +0100, skrev Susan Bugher
-> <[email protected]>:
->
-> -> Mark Warner wrote:
-> ->
-> -> -> Susan Bugher wrote:
-> -> ->
-> -> -> -> No Linux?
-> -> -> -> Okay, here's the one you should have first. . .
-> -> -> Which one?
-> ->
-> -> Knoppix, KDE desktop/shell(?) (I think). ;) The rationale was that
-> -> KDE is the most Windows-like interface - therefore the easiest
to
-> -> start with.
-> ->
-> -> Susan
->
-> Mandriva is also a Windows-like distro that is easy to start up with
-> for Windows-folks.

KDE is the default GUI for Mandriva (formerly Mandrake).

Ed
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top