Linux is ok, since its free, but how about a OS that saves you money?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kenny
  • Start date Start date
Thomas said:
Jeez, don't you have that one size smaller?

Are we supposed to comprehend this gibberish?
Get a life, man.

Same to you, fella.
Nonsense. I have not reinstalled my Win2k system for four years, after
initial installation. I have no virus scanner installed (hint: look at
my nntp/email client), I have no adware/malware scanners.

I have never had Virus, Infection, Spyware, Trojan, Adware (short Vista)
stuff on my machine...

Good for you. You have more of a clue than the average Windows user. Now,
why do you defend an OS, one that is woefully inadequate for the "non
geeks" that it purports to serve, as the "smooth and efficient" solution?
so what are you talking about? About the intrinsic behaviour of "the
masses" or the leaks and bugs of an inferior operating system?

Need it spelled out for you, huh?

Microsoft is derelict in their responsability to provide "non geeks"
secure software. Microsoft software is also grossly overpriced.
Every OS is as good as its users.

That's what an M$ apologist will tell you, anyway. Blame the users for
not immediately dumping IE and OE (but put big icons on the desktop for
them).
 
kenny said:
you cas clearly see that I am not a microsoft drone... nor a troll
that wants to bash linux just for fun

We "cas clearly see" that only after you've quit starting FUD
threads here. It would also help if you didn't crosspost. Can't you
set up a blog or something to house your "valuable information"?
 
Bill said:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

First I've heard of that. Which legacy formats can't a MS app open?

Mr Bill

Their own .doc documents and many others.
Just google.
 
After takin' a swig o' grog, Bill Turner belched out this bit o' wisdom:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
By the time you have typed all that crap, hopefully correctly, I have
clicked and dragged the files where I want them.

Depends. I can type "cp *.[ch]* somewhere" to copy nothing but source
code modules faster than I can bring up or get to the GUI, navigate to
where I already am in the console window, laboriously select the *.c,
*.h, and *.cpp files, then either copy or drag them as I navigate to
where I want to go, then make sure exactly the proper directory is
highlighted, let go of the mouse, and then watch the pretty animated
dialog.
And any combination of filetypes too, not just .jpg's or whatever. This
is just one among many reasons Windows is so popular and you guys just
don't get it.

What do you mean? The fact that we geeks have not only GUI operations
quite similar to what you have with Windows, PLUS we also have a more
sophisticated command shell that can make some operations much faster
than a GUI can? That means we don't get it?

Well, I hope you're a troll, then, because your statements are just
plain stupid.
 
After takin' a swig o' grog, Bill Turner belched out this bit o' wisdom:

Confirming troll status. Please wait while processing. This operation
may take some time.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

More likely one million have downloaded it 250 times trying to get it
to work, just like Linux. :-)

Troll status confirmed.
 
Linønut" <"=?iso-8859-1?Q?lin=F8nut?= said:
After takin' a swig o' grog, Bill Turner belched out this bit o'
wisdom:

Confirming troll status. Please wait while processing. This
operation may take some time.


Troll status confirmed.

You forgot the "Reboot now or later" ;-)
 
I like it here for now... :-)




»Q« said:
We "cas clearly see" that only after you've quit starting FUD
threads here. It would also help if you didn't crosspost. Can't you
set up a blog or something to house your "valuable information"?
 
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, Gordon
<[email protected]>
wrote
So what makes you think that Linux doesn't have "drag and drop"? Try Ubuntu
in it's current version. NO difference to Windows at all, except the need
for Windows to have AV apps, malware apps etc etc!

Why don't you TRY it instead of making wild and totally ignorant statements?

Because, in this particular case, he's probably right. However,
there's other considerations, depending on the direction
one wants to take this discussion.

[1] That mv could just as easily do 'mv *_jpg ../somewhere-else'.
Three guesses on how well Windows will handle *that*, since
_jpg is not a file extension. (It's not clear Nautilus or
Konqueror can do much with it, either, though Motif-era file
requesters might be able to take the '*_jpg' wildcard.)

[2] With the find command, a lot of things could ensue. For
instance, the command

$ find . -name '*.jpg' -mtime +7 -exec mv {} ../somewhere-else \;

will move any .jpg in the current directory or any subdirectory
thereof (if one doesn't want that one can use -maxdepth 1)
that's more than 7 days old somewhere else. Note that the
.jpg could be anything: text, pictures, scripts, directories.

[3] If one doesn't have file extensions, with Windows one is kinda
stuck. However, in Linux, one can do things like

$ find . -type f -mtime +7 | xargs file | \
grep '^.*: PNG image data, ' | \
awk -F: '{print $1;}' | cpio -oc > archive.cpio

which will take any file older than 7 days, open it, check
to see if it looks like a PNG file, and, if it is, take
it and throw it into a CPIO archive.

The naive user will probably think this is gobbledygook but it's
actually fairly simple, and can be tested easily by
omitting the tail end of the pipeline. Admittedly, tarballs
are more common, and tar's a little harder to feed.

[4] If one has a fancy script and/or program that returns 0 on
success, 1 on failure, one can feed it to find to test files.

$ find . -type f -mtime +7 -exec /home/user/bin/testfile {} \; \
-exec mv {} ../somewhere-else \;

will first run '/home/user/bin/testfile' on any file in the
subtree that's older than 7 days, and, if testfile exits with
0 status, move the file to somewhere-else.

Of course there are many things one can do here, depending on
how fancy one wants to make the script. For example, one
can feed it multiple arguments, and allow it to do all the work:

$ find . -type f -mtime +7 -print0 | \
xargs -0 /home/user/bin/processfiles

(the -print0 and -0 allow xargs to see filenames properly, if
there are spaces in them; it's a blot but necessary for
historical reasons, presumably).

Or one can simply have it read from standard input:

$ find . -type f -mtime +7 -print0 | /home/usr/bin/processfiles --zero

(where --zero is an option passed to the script that it picks up.)

Or find can be put inside the script, making things a little
more convenient for the user.

[5] If one is typing something such as

$ mv *.jpg ../som<TAB>

the shell will either generate the command line

$ mv *.jpg ../somewhere-else

or it will not, in which case another tab will generate output
that looks a bit like:

$ mv *.jpg ../som<TAB><TAB>
../soma ../sombrero ../something-else ../somewhere-else
$ mv *.jpg ../som

This is an innovation not available in the early 80's, though
things such as ICE were being implemented on VMS in the
mid-80's, and ksh was available in the early 90's. I suspect
it came into being around then.

[6] For the simpler stuff, one can do 'locate'. There's some
issues with 'locate', mostly because it's slightly brain-dead
when it comes to searching through filenames (it's basically
a grep through a list generated by 'updatedb' on a periodic
basis), but it's faster than find for those times when one
doesn't need all the flexibility of find, but needs something
more powerful than a simple 'ls'.

[7] To convert these pipelines to automated backups is but a single
step, using 'crontab -e'. (A better solution, admittedly, is
to create a script then feed that to 'crontab -e', but it's
almost as simple; just cut and paste the pipeline into
a text editor window.)

But yes, never mind all that; Windows is easy to use and does
everything. :-P :-)
 
kenny said:
Sorry I am not in the US, your insults dont apply.

Sorry, I thought your writing about 'teaching' and so, reminded me and
got to me to that conclusion.


Well, then.




Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
kenny said:
I like it here for now... :-)


O:k: But it´s not Freeware.

And with so much money it is easy to make a Vista. :-)
Linux distributions are really free. If you can find them!

And the thematic about, which OS is more or less difficult to use, is
canceled by the fact that Linux is also Freeware.



I understand your argumentings, but I think they are misplaced...
sometimes.





Best Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
True, and his move to keep the rights to his product and on sell it to
any other buyer was brilliant

Who?

Which product?

"on sell it to any other buyer?


for some reason the quoted text did not quote..... see below.


Harvey Van Sickle
Jan 24, 8:45 am show options
Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk, alt.comp.freeware
From: Harvey Van Sickle <[email protected]> - Find messages by
this author
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:45:47 GMT
Local: Tues, Jan 24 2006 8:45 am
Subject: Re: Linux is ok, since its free, but how about a OS that saves
you money?
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse

On 23 Jan 2006, wrote
kenny wrote:
-snip-
#*#*# Apple produced the first point and click interface,
Microsoft managed to steal the tecnology without paying for
it, and it was developed by a woman working for the Zerox
corporation and zerox gave it to Steve jobs as they saw no
worth in it.
so maybe Microsoft dominate the market, but only by luck and
clever marketing.

It was more -- way more than that.

In his early days -- not now -- Gates had an uncanny eye for the
direction that things could move, and how he could capitalise on
that.

Hindsight is so strong that people underestimate how rare foresight
actually is.

It takes *way* more than "luck and clever marketing" not only to
see an opening, but more importantly to understand what that
opening can actually *mean* if you think big. What Gates did was
to realise that, and then to throw everything -- fair and foul --
to corner the market.

If Steve Jobs had had anywhere near the same foresight, he'd have
realised that he should have licenced his OS and cornered half of
the full market, rather than remaining a control-freak on his
hardware and winding up with (5%? 10%?) of the potential market.
 
Never needed to;-) (Okay, that was disingenous, but OTOH it's
true.)
You may want to check out the english dictionary that comes with OO.
You just directly contradicted yourself.

--
Mike

He's as blind as he can be
Just sees what he wants to see
Nowhere Man can you see me at all?
- Lennon & McCartney, "Nowhere Man"
 
kenny said:
Linux is great for servers... you set them up and you don't touch them and
they work forever.

I am talking about the DESKTOP of everyday users, and that is a totally
different story.

Replaced 10 W2K workstations with Linux around christmas (don't remember
exactly when) time. Apart from a day going through open office, not heard a
peep out of them. The other users in the same office still on windows (tied
into accounting software and we haven't tried it under WINE yet) - a
different story.
Hey since you are so good at Solaris.. why don't you start selling desktop
computers for the family with Solaris on. I bet they will have great fun
staring at the screen scratching their heads!

No need, gotta pay for Solaris (last I checked) and Linux is free.

Dan







.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
Gordon said:
Not these days - shows how much you REALLY know. Using Synaptic on Debian
sorts it all for you with ONE mouse click. And that's just on one distro.
others are the same.

I'd like to point out that I never said the dependency tree had to be worked
out manually - Windows has dependency trees as well, but as everything gets
bunged in at install time, you tend not see modules needed (though they're
there, sucking up disk space)

Dan







.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
Mitch said:
Google Earth isn't unique; it is built on another product doing the
same thing, and there are at least three free tools offering what
Google Earth does, without the advertising.

Don't give Google credit for this effort; they are also riding someone
else's efforts.

Everyone is riding on someone else wrote before. Escape sequence and Richard
Stallman anyone?

Dan







.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
kenny said:
Oh yeah....how about access?

Why then are so many buying office and love it, when OO is out there for
free?

They either don't know about it, or corporate policy says they have to stay
with the current standard. The Linux machines I mentioned in another post -
the boss almost offered to suck my cock when he found out that the OS *and*
office package was legal, and only cost him my time to install, which he
would have had to pay for for with an MS solution as well.

Who uses all the feature in the latest greatest office versions?

Dan







.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
Rick said:
Then go use the OS that suits your needs.

I think thats the one with the fluffy bunny slippers "fisher price" user
interface.

Dan







.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
Neither is MS Office. Except perhaps Excel -- certainly a great
program, even if most people don't need it at all.

Most of what I see being done in excel should be done in access, but I get
paid to sort it out when they **** it up, so I don't push it more than a
"you should be using access for this" once or twice a month.

Dan







.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
..provided your not wanted to do something like.. hmmm.. video editing,
and provided you can live with inconsistant GUI's that force you to
relearn each and every application

I've found that learning each and every application is the best way to go -
the time I tried to write a letter with freecell was a disaster, but not as
much as trying to create a simulated family with Powerpoint.
because they all do things in a different way...

Yeah, you just can't avoid the similarites between WinDVD Creator2 and Ulead
Video Studio 7

Cock - does your mother know you're awake this late on a school night?

Dan








.................................................................
Posted via TITANnews - Uncensored Newsgroups Access-=Every Newsgroup - Anonymous, UNCENSORED, BROADBAND Downloads=-
 
Back
Top