Leythos said:
Trolling is what you are engaged in currently, it's well defined and
even examples of it online. You don't have to take it as an Opinion,
it's documented for you online in many locations.
Pot calling Kettle Black, come in Kettle, over...
I asked a rhetorical question. You snipped the rest, so OK, let's focus
on what you replied to...
What is a rhetorical question? One that requires nor desires an answer,
rather intended to elicit thought and relection on the subject, often in
an ironic manner. You chose to reply and once again called me a troll.
My intention is not to elicit a confrontational response from you,
rather an effort to get you to think.
I don't give much of a rip about some "official" definition of a troll,
I am concerned that you are here, calling people trolls, telling us your
definition of what a troll is, all the while giving us a fantastic
example of what one is one by your own definition.
I bet you'll once again snip all the salient points I make and re-define
what you call a "troll". Go ahead. It's no skin off my nose. I know who
and what I am no matter what you or anyone else thinks or says, and I
ain't no troll, Buckwheat.
I think you need to learn the difference between trolling and engaging
in a discussion. Sorry that you don't like what some folks' opinions are
here or that some folks are somewhat colorful and even rude (usually
intended in a humorous manner, as far as I've observerd), but that's
just the way it is in usenet. You know that. It does not constitute
"trolling".
That's my opinion. Don't like it? Too bad. I'm no troll and stop calling
me one. If you think I am a troll then you are a troll, too, by your own
definition.

~
Steve N.