Get a Mac!

M

Maverick

Lang said:
I had a Mac SE30 back in the day. It crashed all the time. I suspected
bad memory but was unwilling to invest.

A guy I work with, who is a dyed in the wool PC geek, recently got a
MacBook Pro or whatever they're called. The first day he brought it into
work, he was all proud and sh*t about his new toy. He was like "Hey,
lookit this... running VMWare (or something) and BANG! the Apple
equivilent of a BSOD. LOL. Yeah, Mac's never crash.

Apple doesn't sell VMWare so it isn't a supported producet. DUH!
Oh, yeah, Apple's not proprietary at all. I can run OSX on, uh, what?
Apple hardware? Naw, that ain't proprietary at all. I can run Vista on a
Mac. I can't run OSX on a PC. Hmm...

Yes you can run OS X on a PC. You just have to know how to do it is all.
Google is your friend.
But aside from that, things maywell just change. I'd love to see OS X
sold openly for all PCs to use. That way M$ will get some real
competition that they deserve.
I was equating Windows SP's to Mac OS upgrades, which from what I've
read from posts from Mac owners in the Vista NG's come about once a year
or two, at most, and cost approximately $100.

Along with very good additions to the software base, that windows does
not do or ever done in the past.
And... for the record, if I had the spare cash lying around, I -would-
buy a Mac. I'm not anti-Mac, I'm anti-FUD.

No, you are ill-informed.
With the new Leopard comes the finished bootcamp that will allow you to
dual boot either OS X or Windows. Plus new things that have been kept
secret from the Redmond copying machine.
 
A

Adam Albright

What ever makes you think there is a limited choice of hardware?
I've got all I need. The same for those that purchased any wintel hardware.

Are you older then 14? You don't sound like it.
 
A

Adam Albright

Apple doesn't sell VMWare so it isn't a supported producet. DUH!

Well duh... thanks for proving my point. If you by a Mac, you're stuck
in a tiny sub section of the universe of "approved" hardware and a
have a very limited selection of software to pick from. Its a big
world out there junior. I much prefer to have thousands of vendors
competing to build a better mouse trap to pick from then a handful.
That's why when you walk into a typical computer store you see 95% of
the floor space devoted to Windows products and if you're lucky they
maybe have a forgotten dark corner somewhere for Mac freaks. LOL!
 
D

Diamontina Cocktail

None said:
But they have never been breached... that's the difference.

If you believe that then you must believe a Mac to be impregnable. The
moment you believe that is the moment you are in trouble. Honestly, READ and
LEARN from the REAL security researchers/experts and be AWARE.
 
D

Diamontina Cocktail

Maverick said:
Of course, but after using a mac for three years without ever getting a
virus or whatever, it makes you wonder if that statement is correct
anymore.

You only have to look at what the security researchers say to see it is.
Some of the problems released for Macs in Jan 2007 include direct access to
the machine as if the remote hacker were sitting in front of it.

Now the reason it may not have happened to many Macs is the same as when you
are at the local pool. The hoons only go and try to make big splashes in the
deep end, not the wading pool.
 
M

Maverick

Adam said:
Well duh... thanks for proving my point.

The only point is the one under you hat.
If you by a Mac, you're stuck
in a tiny sub section of the universe of "approved" hardware and a
have a very limited selection of software to pick from.

Wrong. With bootcamp, you can load up Vista.
Its a big
world out there junior.

Guffaw!! I'm old enough to be your daddy.
I much prefer to have thousands of vendors
competing to build a better mouse trap to pick from then a handful.

Hah! They are all the same. Is there a significant difference between
an HP or a Dell? Nope.
Is there a difference between a DS10L Alpha workstation and an HP PC or
Dell PC?? You bet there are.
That's why when you walk into a typical computer store you see 95% of
the floor space devoted to Windows products and if you're lucky they
maybe have a forgotten dark corner somewhere for Mac freaks. LOL!

I'll have the last laugh. All you see are commodity crap.
Professional systems aren't found at BestBuy or anywhere the public
shops. All I see is that 8 billion flies like to eat crap.
 
A

Adam Albright

Wrong. With bootcamp, you can load up Vista.

Anybody call you a fool today? Well now they have. Any OS emulation is
usually so slow it isn't worth the bother and kid, its nothing new. It
was possible to run Windows software on a Mac and run Mac software
under Windows for years. You really don't know much do ya. Too bad.
Guffaw!! I'm old enough to be your daddy.

Damn, you're in your 80's? Well grandpa, you're still petty dumb when
it comes to computers, but hey, that's par for course for Mac freaks.
You're dumb enough to think that little cube or puple thing on your
desk is a computer and not the toy it actually is.
Hah! They are all the same. Is there a significant difference between
an HP or a Dell? Nope.
Is there a difference between a DS10L Alpha workstation and an HP PC or
Dell PC?? You bet there are.


I'll have the last laugh. All you see are commodity crap.
Professional systems aren't found at BestBuy or anywhere the public
shops. All I see is that 8 billion flies like to eat crap.

Take a hike grandpa, this is a WINDOWS forum, go peddle your crap to
other freaks that think Macs are serious computers. You'll have a much
more receptive audience, because they will be as dumb as you are.
 
D

Donald McDaniel

Robert Moir said:
You can't because Apple don't want you to. They want you to buy hardware
from Apple.


Apple don't want to do that either. Again, Apple want you to buy hardware
from them. But you can run Windows on Apple hardware just fine.

Actually, I LOVE the Apple Intel PCs. They make GREAT hardware platforms
for Vista or XP (or just about any Intel-based OS, for that matter). In
addition, that crappy OS (Mac OS 10) doesn't even have to be installed on
them to install a Windows OS.

So I say, "Apple go bragh", as well as "Microsoft go bragh!" The BEST
hardware platform for the BEST OS!!!
By the way, Anglo-European syntactic constructions such as using plural
verbs with corporate names is ANTI-AMERICAN!!!

But you're right: Apple WANTS you to buy hardware from them, just as they
want you to buy their crappy OS and install it only on their hardware.
Nothing wrong with that. After all, Apple is not a non-profit corporation,
just as Microsoft is not a non-profit corporation. It's all about making
money for their stockholders. Again, nothing wrong with that -- unless you
are a Soviet-style Communist. We know how long THAT lasted in the scheme of
things
 
L

Lang Murphy

No, I'm not ill informed... I just don't agree with your view of the world.

Lang
 
L

Lang Murphy

This guy's just a troll... don't bother trying to have an intelligent
conversation with him. He only sees life through Steve Jobs colored
spectacles.

Lang
 
D

Donald McDaniel

Maverick said:
The only point is the one under you hat.


Wrong. With bootcamp, you can load up Vista.


Guffaw!! I'm old enough to be your daddy.


Hah! They are all the same. Is there a significant difference between an
HP or a Dell? Nope.
Is there a difference between a DS10L Alpha workstation and an HP PC or
Dell PC?? You bet there are.


I'll have the last laugh. All you see are commodity crap.
Professional systems aren't found at BestBuy or anywhere the public shops.
All I see is that 8 billion flies like to eat crap.


Hmmmm...The Public does not shop at CompUSA (one example)? When I go into
one, I see a small section in the back for Apples, all kinds, from
"commodity crap" like the MiniMacs and MacBooks, to the PowerMacs

Actually, the ONLY "Professional" Macs are the PowerMacs and the Mac
Servers. ALL OTHERS are what you call "commodity crap".
However, the Apple Intel iMacs, Mac Book Pros,and PowerMacs are GREAT Vista
hardware platforms. And Boot Camp is NOT necessary to install Vista on one,
unless you want to keep that piece-of-crap OS on it. Why waste a decent
computer with a crappy OS?

8 Billion flies may like to eat crap, but 8 billion people like to eat
decent food.

Macs are ok, and they really look nice on a desk or in the living room. But
I much prefer PCs, since they are user-expandable and the parts are
user-replaceable, unlike all the Apple Intels except the PowerMacs.

If ANYONE is going to get the last laugh, it certainly won't be you, bud.
 
D

Donald McDaniel

Adam Albright said:
Anybody call you a fool today? Well now they have. Any OS emulation is
usually so slow it isn't worth the bother and kid, its nothing new. It
was possible to run Windows software on a Mac and run Mac software
under Windows for years. You really don't know much do ya. Too bad.

Damn, you're in your 80's? Well grandpa, you're still petty dumb when
it comes to computers, but hey, that's par for course for Mac freaks.
You're dumb enough to think that little cube or puple thing on your
desk is a computer and not the toy it actually is.

Take a hike grandpa, this is a WINDOWS forum, go peddle your crap to
other freaks that think Macs are serious computers. You'll have a much
more receptive audience, because they will be as dumb as you are.

Sorry, Adam, but Vista installed via Boot Camp is NOT an emulated
environment. Once Vista is installed and booted, it OWNS the hardware, and
runs natively, since Apple Intel PCs are just Apple-branded PCs. In fact
ANY Intel-based OS will install as the exclusive OS on Apple Intel PCs
without Boot Camp. I know, because I have done it personally on my Apple
Intel iMac. I installed both XP Pro and Vista on it in EXACTLY the same way
I would install them on a "generic PC".

Its a new world out there, Adam...
 
D

Donald McDaniel

Lang Murphy said:
No, I'm not ill informed... I just don't agree with your view of the
world.

Lang

"Competition from OS X". What a laugh!!! OS X is nothing but a prettified
version of Linux.
(I can't believe I said that, since I can't stand the ugliness of OS X, and
I removed it from my Apple Intel iMac as soon as I learnt that it could
deleted from the HD, and XP installed in its place.)

We all know how THAT "competition" is going...

$129, to be exact.

Software base for Apple? Yeah, right..

It is not necessary to use Boot Camp to install Windows, sir.
 
D

Donald McDaniel

Lang Murphy said:
No, I'm not ill informed... I just don't agree with your view of the
world.

Lang

"Competition from OS X". What a laugh!!! OS X is nothing but a prettified
version of Linux.
(I can't believe I said that, since I can't stand the ugliness of OS X, and
I removed it from my Apple Intel iMac as soon as I learnt that it could
deleted from the HD, and XP installed in its place.)

We all know how THAT "competition" is going...

$129, to be exact.

Software base for Apple? Yeah, right..

It is not necessary to use Boot Camp to install Windows, sir.
 
R

Robert Moir

Donald said:
Actually, I LOVE the Apple Intel PCs. They make GREAT hardware
platforms for Vista or XP (or just about any Intel-based OS, for that
matter).

Yes, I've actually found the MacBook range to be about the best
"Vista-ready" laptop I've worked with, which is kinda amusing.
In addition, that crappy OS (Mac OS 10) doesn't even have
to be installed on them to install a Windows OS.

I personally don't see it that way, of course, but it's your money.
 
C

CZ

Don:

Hardware devices require drivers, so how well do the following work within
Vista on a Mac:
Screen resolution and color depth
Sleep mode
Sound
Networking via Ethernet port
USB v2.0 ports

What limitations/problems are you aware of?
Performance?

TIA
 
D

Donald McDaniel

Robert Moir said:
Yes, I've actually found the MacBook range to be about the best
"Vista-ready" laptop I've worked with, which is kinda amusing.


I personally don't see it that way, of course, but it's your money.


Actually, I sold my Apple Intel iMac (Gen1), and used the proceeds to buy a
nice Dell Dimension E520. It is also a great Vista platform. Vista is very
stable on it.
 
D

Donald McDaniel

CZ said:
Don:

Hardware devices require drivers, so how well do the following work within
Vista on a Mac:
Screen resolution and color depth
Sleep mode
Sound
Networking via Ethernet port
USB v2.0 ports

What limitations/problems are you aware of?
Performance?

TIA

NOTE that everything I mention below was under various beta releases of
Vista, not the RTM, or under XP Pro w/SP2.

My experience with an Apple Intel iMac was with a Generation 1 machine. And
Vista was still in Beta when I used it.

As to Screen resolution and color depth: I got the highest resolution my
card (an ATI 7600 Pro) would provide (which was 1680x1050, on a 20" display.
On the built-in display, I got 1440x960, the rated resolution of the display
(17"). Color depth on either display was 32bits. The display had
absolutely no dead pixels out of the box, and all the time I owned it, no
pixel ever died. The display was clear and sharp, with no ghosting at all.

The machine ALWAYS slept properly, and the machine came out of sleep within
10 seconds, with the Desktop ready to use.

I got good sound, even superior sound, on two speakers. But I certainly
have no ear for such distinctions. If it sounds good to me, I like it. It
sounded good to me. In addition, I could have used a tos-link cable
leading to digital speakers. But I did not have digital speakers, so I
can't speak for them.

At the time, our house was using an Apple Airport base station with
Satellite service, and I connected to the house network via wireless (built
in the iMac). It always worked. With Beta 1 I had no connectivity in
Vista, and I had to download the driver from the Web on another machine
before I could get wireless working, but the Broadcom drivers were present
on Beta 2 and the Release Candidate, and wireless was up within 5 seconds
of the Desktop coming up.

USB ports: They were both USB 2.x ports. In addition, there were two USB
2.x ports on the provided Apple Pro Keyboard (I didn't like the keyboard,
and soon replaced it with one of my wireless Microsoft keyboards. It worked
just as it would on a PC.

Firewire: 2 Firewire 480 ports. Always worked well.

The machine had a mini-DVI connector on the back of display, to which I
connected a secondary 20" Apple Cinema Display. But the DVI-to-MiniDVI
adapter kept falling out when I turned the system unit even a small amount.


Using Boot Camp software, Vista installed as a dual-boot with OS X with no
trouble at all.

However, there were a few features which did not work under Vista:
1) The Apple Remote did not work in Vista. Apple did not provide a driver.
2) The Macintosh Drivers for Windows XP disk did not work under Vista, so I
had to install the drivers which were supplied manually by extracting the
drivers to a folder on my HD and starting the installers individually.
3) The CD-Eject key did not work at all during installation, since the Apple
keyboard driver cannot be installed until the installation of Vista was
finished. Once on the Vista Desktop, with the drivers installed, the
CD-Eject key worked well.
Because this key does not work in the XP installer, it is not possible to
use Upgrade media to install XP. It would be different with Vista, however,
since there is no need to eject the installation media once the Vista
installer starts.
4) The built-in iSight camera did not work, since the provided driver only
worked under XP. Nevertheless, Vista still recognized the camera, yet the
camera did not work.

I felt it necessary to download the ATI Catalyst Vista drivers (beta at the
time) for my card and install it, but soon rolled back to the Boot Camp
provided ATI drivers, since the ATI Catalyst beta was very shaky, and made
the machine unstable. By the way, the reason the Macintosh Drivers for XP
disk would not install the drivers was because each time the driver
installer came to the Catalyst Control Center, the installer crapped out,
and refused to run any more.

All-in-all, Vista, even in its beta state, ran well and stable on my Intel
iMac.

As to installing Vista as the exclusive OS, and removing OS X:

1) This was much simpler than people were making it to be.
2) It was not possible until the release of Beta 2 of Vista.
3) The Apple firmware updates necessary to dual-boot with XP or Vista
provide a BIOS emulator in the EFI chip on the motherboard. This means that
ANY Intel-based OS using a BIOS can be installed on an Apple Intel machine
as the exclusive OS.
4) It is now even possible to delete the EFI partition, and completely wipe
the HD, and start the Vista installer normally, as you would if you were
installing it on a totally wiped drive in a Wintel machine, since the Apple
Boot menu is in hardware, not software, as it is in Windows.
5) The necessary firmware updates have been installed at the factory on the
second generation Apple Intel PCs, so its not necessary to install OS X in
order to install them. However, it is necessary to run Boot Camp under OS
X, for ONE reason: To create the Macintosh Drivers for XP disk. Once it is
created, the HD can be completely wiped, and ANY Intel-based OS can be
installed normally (such as various distros of Linux, MSDOS, Windows, etc).
There is probably a good chance that with the release of Leopard, the
Macintosh Drivers Disk for Windows will include native drivers for Vista,
instead of having to make do with the XP drivers. They work, (most of
them), but it really is a lot of trouble to get them extracted and then
manually installed one by one when installing them in Vista. Its also
possible that the RTM of Vista broke one or more of them which worked
passably well in the Betas.

Anyway, I give the Apple Intel PCs high marks. As Apple says, "They just
work". But I would change that a bit:
"They just work (mostly), if you can find the right drivers." But of
course, the same is true in the Windows world. Its all about finding the
right drivers nowadays..

There is a caveat with running XP or Vista on an Apple Intel PC, however,
especially on the Intel iMacs, Mac Books, and the Mac Minis:

The Intel iMacs are NOT user-upgradeable, other than external devices and
memory. This means it is dangerous to change out the stock internal HD for
a larger one. Personally, I would take such a machine to an Apple
Authorized technician to have it done. Their hardrives are not easily
replaceable, since the case is very difficult to open. Unless a layman
knows what he is doing, he can easily screw it up, and void his warranty.
You have to pretty much take the machine apart to swap the HD out. I took
mine to the local CompUSA to have it done. They charged me a total of $35
(plus the HD) to change it to a larger one. Taking it to Apple directly
would probably have cost a minimum of $100+the HD, plus your time spent
waiting for it to be returned. Changing my stock 160GB SATA drive for a
300GB SATA II drive did cause the case to get warmer, however. But NOT "hot
to the touch". So I suggest that anyone order their machine with a larger
HD (Apple currently offers either a 160GB SATA drive, or a 250GB SATA HD in
the Intel iMacs.) Ask for the 250GB drive to be installed at the factory
rather than a 160 if you buy the low-end Intel iMac.

If you can afford it, purchase a top-of-the-line Mac Pro. They are truly
professional machines, easily upgradeable, and tough as nails. In addition,
they are beautiful, and its very easy to work on the interior hardware. The
HDs are easily replaceable, and have no cables to fill up the interior of
the case. Just snap them in, and snap them out if you want to change one
out. If you've ever seen the interior of a Mac Pro's heavy-duty case (no
thin-walled steel case, these: the cases are solid and have substance to
them, and easy to open and close, without getting cuts on your fingers from
sharp edges, as is common with PC cases), you will have to say, "Well done,
Apple!!!" They are like Ferraris in quality. I can easily say that they
are superbly engineered, at the very least. I would suspect that the case
walls are at least 1/8" thick.

Vista on a Mac Pro would be the best of the best of all Personal computer
environments.

I could go on and on about the Apple Mac Pro, but its getting rather late,
and I need sleep.

Hopefully, I have not drowned you with words..
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top