Foxmail problem

L

Luis Cobian

No, M$ learned nothing. If you have ever programmed on VMS, you keep
running into things in NT that are strangely reminiscent. (And if you
have ever programmed on VMS, you will remember how long the
blue/orange/grey wall of manuals for it was!)

Well, if you have ever programmed on Linux your are running into things that
are strangely reminescent of 1980s *nix, which is even worse if you ask me
:)
 
G

Gary R. Schmidt

Luis said:
(Some people would doubt that M$ learned anything but I think



Well, at least they **have** a decent API. Don't let me started about other
OS :))))))
Which one?

VMS? RSX? TOPS? OS9? OS/2? RSTS? pSOS? AOS/VS? CTOS? BTOS?
MPE? CP-M? PC/MS-DOS? MacOS? Solaris? AIX? HPUX? Tru64? SunOS?
Ultrix? OSF-1? Xenix? DomainOS? Dynix? DG-UX? Netware? Etcetera,
etcetera, et-bloody-cetera...

Cheers,
Gary B-)
 
G

Gary R. Schmidt

Luis said:
Well, if you have ever programmed on Linux your are running into things that
are strangely reminescent of 1980s *nix, which is even worse if you ask me
:)
Newbie.

UNIX, btw, started in 1971.

Cheers,
Gary B-)
 
U

ulf_honkanen

Gary said:


Mhh... Newbie? You *know* who are you talking to? I doubd the author of
Cobian Backup and a handfull of other great utilities is a newbie. What
have *you* done?
 
T

Thomas Lauer

Gary R. Schmidt said:
No, M$ learned nothing. If you have ever programmed on VMS, you keep
running into things in NT that are strangely reminiscent. (And if you

Well, the reasons for *that* are obvious:)

But I honestly think they do learn. Sometimes. Something.
 
G

Gary R. Schmidt

Mhh... Newbie? You *know* who are you talking to? I doubd the author of
Cobian Backup and a handfull of other great utilities is a newbie. What
have *you* done?
Written software for over 20 years, perhaps?

Cheers,
Gary B-)
 
R

Renan

SELECT * FROM alt.comp.freeware WHERE AUTHOR = David:
You are correct if the data is actually stored in memory but you are
ignoring the memory requirements needed to store such a humungous
amount of data especially when most of it is not needed until a
program is actually invoked. I have programs that write data into the
registry yet I would only use those programs occasionally.

I get your point.
Starting a program and reading an ini file as it is invoked utilises
less memory and once the program is closed the memory from the ini
data can/should be released. The only data that need to be in memory,
in my opinion, would be the file-type/called-program information. Even
that is/was stored mainly in an ini file by Windows, at least up until
W98.

Unfortunately, some (rather stupid) programs like to write INI files in
the WINDOWS folder.
Since only users with administrative rights can write on the WINDOWS
directory, only the "Administrator" can use them.
The risk of corruption of the single registry file is greater than the
risk of corrupting multiple ini files. Lose your registry and you can
be faced with reinstalling multiple programs. Lose an ini file and you
only have one program that needs to be reinstalled.

Usually, registry corruption (at least for me) meant failing hardware
(bad RAM or bad hard drive) or corrupted filesystem. I'm yet to get a
corrupt registry with a NTFS file system.
 
R

Renan

From Gary R. Schmidt to alt.comp.freeware:
No, M$ learned nothing. If you have ever programmed on VMS, you keep
running into things in NT that are strangely reminiscent. (And if you
have ever programmed on VMS, you will remember how long the
blue/orange/grey wall of manuals for it was!)

VMS. Increase each letter by 1, gives WNT . Coincidence, or not?

(Actually, I remember that one of the VMS developers worked on Windows
NT)

I never programmed VMS, though I know some commands.
 
G

Gary R. Schmidt

Renan said:
From Gary R. Schmidt to alt.comp.freeware:



VMS. Increase each letter by 1, gives WNT . Coincidence, or not?
Yes.

Take my surname, "schmidt".

What's nominally the middle letter oh the English alphabet: M
Put an H in front of it: HM
What letter comes after H? I, put that on the end: HMI
Put a C in front, CHMI, what's after C? D, on the end: CHMID
Put an S in front, SCHMI, what's after S? T: SCHMIDT.

Obviously the universe is trying to tell us something!
(Actually, I remember that one of the VMS developers worked on Windows
NT)
More than one. A few from Digital went to the joint IBM/MS OS/2 project
(religious reasons, they were VMS zealots and DEC was heading towards
UNIX as a primary OS), and when MS pulled out of that they went with MS
and so we got NT. OS/2, of course, died. As did DEC.

NT's "original" name was "OS/2 Version 3"

Cheers,
Gary B-)
 
T

Thomas Lauer

Gary R. Schmidt said:
Take my surname, "schmidt".
What's nominally the middle letter oh the English alphabet: M
Put an H in front of it: HM
What letter comes after H? I, put that on the end: HMI
Put a C in front, CHMI, what's after C? D, on the end: CHMID
Put an S in front, SCHMI, what's after S? T: SCHMIDT.

Obviously the universe is trying to tell us something!

Thanks for that, Gary. A very good one:)
 
D

Daniel Mandic

Gary said:
Yes.

Take my surname, "schmidt".

What's nominally the middle letter oh the English alphabet: M
Put an H in front of it: HM
What letter comes after H? I, put that on the end: HMI
Put a C in front, CHMI, what's after C? D, on the end: CHMID
Put an S in front, SCHMI, what's after S? T: SCHMIDT.

Obviously the universe is trying to tell us something!


Hi Gary Schmidt!



Universe is Uni. Uni is One.

That what you told is mostly dual, and Schmidt a central German
Surname. (Dualism Experts)


You started so genius and broke everything by saying it has something
to do with universe ;-)


Universe Name is "je", "jeh" ... some Jamaican say "Jah".



Kind Regards,

Daniel Mandic
 
R

Renan

From Gary R. Schmidt to alt.comp.freeware:
More than one. A few from Digital went to the joint IBM/MS OS/2 project
(religious reasons, they were VMS zealots and DEC was heading towards
UNIX as a primary OS), and when MS pulled out of that they went with MS
and so we got NT. OS/2, of course, died. As did DEC.

DEC was bought by Compaq, and Compaq was bought by HP.

And OpenVMS lives!
They still sell OpenVMS systems: http://h71000.www7.hp.com/
 
S

Spacey Spade

In reply to Luis Cobian:

1) Security and sharing a program with 5 users
For simple maintenance's sake, I avoid this by getting 5 computers.
Really.
2) Multithreading
I know little about this, but, I'd prefer the programmer have a harder
time (figuring out clever ways around this) than the users having to
redo their settings because they forgot to back up the registry key.
Think that the programmer is also a user. Don't open multiple
instances.
3) Flexibility with types of information that can be stored
Information is information. What difference does it make what type it
is? At least strings are readable in a text editor.
4) Speed
Right, load everything when windows starts, rather than when you need
it! What? 200 milliseconds to load an ini file from the hard drive,
which then stays in RAM?

Nope, haven't convinced me
 
L

Luis Cobian

Hello !
In reply to Luis Cobian:

1) Security and sharing a program with 5 users
For simple maintenance's sake, I avoid this by getting 5 computers.
Really.

No comment. You *do* realize that this is a silly argument, don't you.

2) Multithreading
I know little about this, but, I'd prefer the programmer have a harder
time (figuring out clever ways around this) than the users having to
redo their settings because they forgot to back up the registry key.
Think that the programmer is also a user. Don't open multiple
instances.

As I said, it's the programmers business to povide an easy way to backup the
settings. Multiple instances must be open sometime. You don't want to limit
the number of instances, believe me, that is plain silly.

3) Flexibility with types of information that can be stored
Information is information. What difference does it make what type it
is? At least strings are readable in a text editor.

The ini files don't exist for the user, but for the program. The settings
should be modified using a dialog box and NEVER NEVER NEVER editing the ini
file directly. So many things could go wrong here.
4) Speed
Right, load everything when windows starts, rather than when you need
it! What? 200 milliseconds to load an ini file from the hard drive,
which then stays in RAM?

Sometimes a lot more.
Nope, haven't convinced me

I don't want to. I have already convinced myself.
 
T

Thomas Lauer

Luis Cobian said:
The ini files don't exist for the user, but for the program. The settings
should be modified using a dialog box and NEVER NEVER NEVER editing the ini
file directly. So many things could go wrong here.

But then again, being able to copy and paste configurations in INI files
can be a great time saver for people who know what they're doing.
 
L

Luis Cobian

But then again, being able to copy and paste configurations in INI files
can be a great time saver for people who know what they're doing.
Well, yes. Ditto for exporting/importing registry keys :)
 
U

ulf_honkanen

For simple maintenance's sake, I avoid this by getting 5 computers.

Well, man I want YOU to work at my kid's school. 500 students and their
computer class has only 100 computers. Yeah, multiuser systems are not
necesary. Right.
Don't open multiple instances.

Well, I don't want ANY program you design. I ***HATE*** when programs
don't allow me to open multiple instances. If things were as you want
it would be a pain in the a** even to copy some text from notepad to
notepad because only one instance could be open at the same time.

I'd say, get a grip.
 
S

Spacey Spade

1) Security and sharing a program with 5 users
No comment. You *do* realize that this is a silly argument, don't you.

Not for those who can afford it. It is the superior solution.
As I said, it's the programmers business to povide an easy way to backup the
settings. Multiple instances must be open sometime. You don't want to limit
the number of instances, believe me, that is plain silly.

Ok then, back up the settings automatically when the program closes,
into a file in the same directory as the program. When the program
starts and does not find settings in the registry, have it use the file
to import registry settings back to the registry. Or just use an ini
file. Don't give the user yet one more maintenance task. I think this
is why ACF users prefer ini files... they are maintenance free.
The ini files don't exist for the user, but for the program. The settings
should be modified using a dialog box and NEVER NEVER NEVER editing the ini
file directly. So many things could go wrong here.

I edit the registry. I edit ini files. It's up to the user to decide
if they are up to it, or are you saying they do not have the right to
choose? May I ask... do you live in China? Perhaps the Chinese are on
to something here. After all, the average citizen does not know best
what is right, and they should be protected. Come to think of it, I
agree with you completely. I shall stop editing these things.
Sometimes a lot more.

1) Do you have some stats?
2) Do you know of any operating systems that don't use the windows
style registry?
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top