M
Mitch
There certainly is, because there is a necessary and implicit logicalSaucy said:There's not necessarily one "right" way
context.
The context is TIME. Westerners read DOWNWARD.
This is not opinion, it is not flexible, and it is not variable. It's
always --- ALWAYS -- the same. Therefore, all readers need to work
within that idea. Reading DOWNWARD.
If you make up any rule against that, you're simply making up new
conditions, and ignoring the basic fact.
That said, it seems to me that messages out of the community context
(such as e-mail, which typically is between only two people) have much
more flexibility, because the context of each reply is known to both
parties. Since the previous message is known, you don't have to follow
a rule which is about contextual clarity. Context is already
understood; it's not foundational. So e-mails between two people would
allow the authors to break the basic logical context (and not lose
meaning).