XP Yearly Reinstall? Dell Docking Station Can't Connect to Interne

L

Leythos

However, I presume that John is not such a user and most here aren't as well and thus for
the vast majority, a periodcal reinstall of the OS in not warranted.

At the same time, if you were to do all the basics that a "Standard"
home user does with their system and the maintenance they do (almost
none), then a reinstall from scratch could bring back performance that
was lost due to many factors.

I've seen in many times, doing the basic, included MS maintenance in
every OS does not come close to keeping the system at optimal operation.
 
T

The Real Truth [MS MVP]

That's a crock of Sh*t what Leythos the Stalker has posted. If software
developers only test their software on clean installs then they would go out
of business real fast. No manufacture ever suggest that you do a clean
install of windows in order to use their software. It never happens, tests
are done in real life situations that's the only way to find the bugs.

--
The Real Truth http://pcbutts1-therealtruth.blogspot.com/
*WARNING* Do NOT follow any advice given by the people listed below.
They do NOT have the expertise or knowledge to fix your issue. Do not waste
your time.
David H Lipman, Malke, PA Bear, Beauregard T. Shagnasty, Leythos.
 
P

(PeteCresswell)

Per Ken Blake, MVP:
With a modicum of care, it should never be necessary to reinstall
Windows (XP or any other version)

It might come down to one's definition of "necessary".

My experience with literally dozens of re-imagings of the same PC
(teenager pounding on it a couple hours a day + always-available
image of a newly-built system .... I don't even think twice
anymore about re-imaging) is that response time tends to improve
after re-imaging.

The longer the sys has been installed/used, the more the
improvement.

Admittedly a totally subjective judgment.... no benchmarks, no
stopwatch... but the phenomenon is definitely there.
 
L

Leythos

That's a crock of Sh*t what Leythos the Stalker has posted. If software
developers only test their software on clean installs then they would go out
of business real fast. No manufacture ever suggest that you do a clean
install of windows in order to use their software. It never happens, tests
are done in real life situations that's the only way to find the bugs.

What a dip PCBUTTS1 is, I didn't say one should ONLY test on a clean XP
system, but if you're not testing applications on a Virgin XP (OS)
system with just OS Vendor updates then you're possibly not seeing the
actual working of the application. Many vendors install DLL and such in
IMPROPER places, they don't always remove them when you uninstall their
applications, your application may be impacted by them or not.

There is also the real chance that some other vendors app, one that you
don't use in your development facility, has been installed on the users
computer and that settings changes or changes to the underlying OS cause
problems for your application, but, if you are not testing on a clean
machine then you don't know where to start.

In all my years as a developer, I've seen non-clean machines be the
downfall of applications thousands of times. A typical issue is when a
Developer modifies/creates code that he's checked out of the library and
then doesn't update the library, he does the QA on his machine and it
passes fine, but, it's released in a rush and the Installation set is
built from the library - the modified DLL is missing and the
installation creates problems for any user installing the new version of
the app. Had the QA process been done on a "Clean" machine there would
not be any custom DLL's installed, testing would have found the missing
modified DLL and prevented customer problems.

The same is true with many AV/Antispyware packages - you test your
application on a clean computer with no AV installed, then you move to
testing it on a machine with the leading vendors AV apps installed....

This is done with what you can reasonably expect to be in the field that
might interact with your application.

To only QA your machine on unclean machines is a disservice to your
customers. This is why people like PCBUTTS are not respected, they don't
really have a clue about application development, don't have a clue
about QA to Production life cycle management, don't really have a clue
about things larger than their single computer environment.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top