XP In Four Computers

  • Thread starter Thread starter FM
  • Start date Start date
F

FM

I'm planning to upgrade from ME to XP. Will I be able to
install XP in all four of my computers at no extra cost?

Thank you
 
No.

You will need to purchase four licenses.
If you like, you can purchase "additional licenses" directly from Microsoft
at a small discount.

Myron
 
FM said:
I'm planning to upgrade from ME to XP. Will I be able to
install XP in all four of my computers at no extra cost?

Thank you

No, of course not! If you had ME installed on all four systems you were in
violation of the EULA - just because you can do something doesn't mean you
should - or that's it's legal.

By installing ME on all four systems means you had stolen three licences.

Four systems = FOUR licences.
 
The EULA is none of the below, so therefore means nothing.

1 : of or relating to law
2 a : deriving authority from or founded on law b : having
a formal status derived from law often without a basis in
actual fact c : established by law;
3 : conforming to or permitted by law or established rules
4 : recognized or made effective by a court of law as
distinguished from a court of equity
5 : of, relating to, or having the characteristics of the
profession of law or of one of its members
6 : created by the constructions of the law
 
Stolen ????????? How do you steal something that belongs
to you in the first place...........lol That sounds like
MS logic !!!!!!!
 
Gawd, not this old argument again.... When you buy XP you do NOT purchase
ownership of the software, you purchase a licence to USE the software on ONE
computer. the only thing you physically own about XP is the media the
software is shipped on and the licence...

Lorne
 
That is what the EULA says and that is what you say,
neither are correct, Thats the point !!!!!!!!!!
 
Lorne said:
Gawd, not this old argument again.... When you buy XP you do NOT
purchase ownership of the software, you purchase a licence to USE the
software on ONE computer. the only thing you physically own about XP
is the media the software is shipped on and the licence...

I purchase a *copy* of software. MS would have to prove otherwise, in a
court of law, to enforce their opinion to the contrary.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
From what I understand, if you are using a OEM version on ME, then you CAN
NOT upgrade the OEM version of ME to XP. YOu have to legally purchase XP
for the 4 computers. OEM versions of software are NOT transferable, or
upgradable.
 
I'm not going to get dragged into a discussion here... There are 2 sides of
the arguement, and neither has so far managed to persuade the other side so
why start the whole thing up again?

Lorne
 
Lorne said:
I'm not going to get dragged into a discussion here... There are 2
sides of the arguement, and neither has so far managed to persuade
the other side so why start the whole thing up again?

Why not? Some people aren't on any side, and might benefit from hearing
both sides of this issue, so that they can come to a more informed
opinion for themselves.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
-----Original Message-----


Why not? Some people aren't on any side, and might benefit from hearing
both sides of this issue, so that they can come to a more informed
opinion for themselves.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


.

I agree with Kurttrail! :)

--
"Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit
patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded
for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit
company that can't stand one bit of competition."
(Anonymous USEnet post)
 
Don't be confused by that argument about legal vs illegal. You CAN'T
install XP in more that one computer. It has internal protections that
prevent you from doing so. So it's more than whether you SHOULD or
SHOULDN'T install in more than one computer. You CAN'T!

Now there are some provisions like time/permits/etc that vary this a little
but.....
 
Look, it's nice and simple. You don't own the software, just a license to
use it. If you buy 1 license, you can install it once, not on 50 million
other computers.

Read the damn thing.

Anon said:
-----Original Message-----


Why not? Some people aren't on any side, and might benefit from hearing
both sides of this issue, so that they can come to a more informed
opinion for themselves.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


.

I agree with Kurttrail! :)

--
"Windows [n.]
A thirty-two bit extension and GUI shell to a sixteen bit
patch to an eight bit operating system originally coded
for a four bit microprocessor and sold by a two-bit
company that can't stand one bit of competition."
(Anonymous USEnet post)
 
Keith said:
Look, it's nice and simple. You don't own the software, just a
license to use it. If you buy 1 license, you can install it once,
not on 50 million other computers.

Read the damn thing.

So you believe everything that is written by a financially-biased
corporation to be truthful?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
Darrell said:
Don't be confused by that argument about legal vs illegal. You CAN'T
install XP in more that one computer. It has internal protections
that prevent you from doing so. So it's more than whether you SHOULD
or SHOULDN'T install in more than one computer. You CAN'T!

Now there are some provisions like time/permits/etc that vary this a
little but.....

Don't be confused by your FUD vs. REALITY! MS has absolutely no way to
know what exact hardware Windows has been installed on unless the END
USER actually tells one of MS's PA phone reps. PA is FUD to trick more
money out of the unsuspecting consumer for the same product. An
educated consumer is fooled by MS's PA FUD.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 
I purchase a *copy* of software. MS would have to prove otherwise, in a
court of law, to enforce their opinion to the contrary.

No, you purchase the media. Possesion of the media alone is no right
to use it, in the case of most MS and other commercial software. Your
right to use the software is solely based on your posession of one COA
per PC you wish to install the software on (in the case of OSes).
 
Don't be confused by your FUD vs. REALITY! MS has absolutely no way to
know what exact hardware Windows has been installed on unless the END
USER actually tells one of MS's PA phone reps. PA is FUD to trick more
money out of the unsuspecting consumer for the same product. An
educated consumer is fooled by MS's PA FUD.

But MSes potential not knowing does not equal their EULA meaning
nothing.
 
Gary said:
No, you purchase the media. Possesion of the media alone is no right
to use it, in the case of most MS and other commercial software. Your
right to use the software is solely based on your posession of one COA
per PC you wish to install the software on (in the case of OSes).

"'Copies' are material objects, other than phonorecords, in which a work
is fixed by any method now known or later developed, and from which the
work can be perceived, reproduced, or otherwise communicated, either
directly or with the aid of a machine or device. The term 'copies'
includes the material object, other than a phonorecord, in which the
work is first fixed." - http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/101.html

Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 117. - Limitations on exclusive rights:
Computer programs

(a) Making of Additional Copy or Adaptation by Owner of Copy. -
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 106, it is not an infringement
for the owner of a copy of a computer program to make or authorize the
making of another copy or adaptation of that computer program provided:

(1) that such a new copy or adaptation is created as an essential step
in the utilization of the computer program in conjunction with a machine
and that it is used in no other manner, or

(2) that such new copy or adaptation is for archival purposes only and
that all archival copies are destroyed in the event that continued
possession of the computer program should cease to be rightful.

I'll go by the definitions & laws laid out under Title 17, and the
reality that I purchased my copy of software from the previous owner of
that copy, the retailer.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Back
Top