XP And My Mouse

M

Michel Merlin

Thanks for the confirmation that my REG file won't change or
delete anything else.

« I did not see your 3rd post (which contained a .REG info)
when I replied »

Given your (implicit) claim about reading "the whole" KB310516,
I didn't think you had missed my post, 6h earlier and only
2 lines above.

« Do you think creating a REG file is a big invention? »

Even if not surprising, it's disturbing to see MS people (staff
or "volunteers") implying that others' authorship (or other
property) could be freely stolen in a case or another (for
instance, when it is not "big").

PS. The dates of the 2 parent messages of 14 Jun (ajocius' Q and
Frank's A) are really the ones that appear in my OE (thread
pane, and messages headers), the error (order inversed) is not
mine.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:58:50 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:26:21 +0530 (11:56:21 GMT)
Subject: Re: I take it that *MY* reg file won't overwrite or
delete the rest of the KEY

I did not see your 3rd post (which contained a .REG info) when I
replied. Be assured that I did not copy *your* REG file and
present it to you.

Do you think creating a REG file is a big invention?

Yes, no other values will be altered.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:00 +0200 (09:36:00 GMT)
Subject: I take it that *MY* reg file won't overwrite or delete
the rest of the KEY

I do think I read the article at least as deeply and carefully
as you did (or you would answer unambiguously to my question,
wouldn't you?) And I am sure you did read my own message - since
you are copying the REG file I wrote, that you were unable to
propose before me, without recalling who wrote it, and (except
turning "guid" into "GUID" and adding a blank line) without
changing a single character in it - but without fully and
unambiguously replying to my question.

Once more I see that MS "volunteers", in addition to bringing
little actual help (at least compared to what they usually
tout), can't acknowledge or understand or thank something
brought by someone else - an acute case of NIHS (Not Invented
Here Syndrom).

This reply addresses as well Frank Saunders' message of
07:21:55 GMT. I deeply regret to see here the names of persons
I learnt to appreciate in the past. And happy to see Robear
more helpful this time... :)
(we all happen to vary in time, good or bad... ;-) )

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:00 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/O%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 09:31:43 +0530 (04:01:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: I mean a single VALUE, without altering the rest
of the KEY

Michel,

Did you read the whole article? Use this REG file:

- - -
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

- - -

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "PA Bear" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:30:56 -0400 (22:30:56 GMT)
Subject: Re: I mean a single VALUE, without altering the rest
of the KEY

Should I mention?...

OE - Reset Compact Check Count to 0 (Line 367, Left)
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm

Nah. <w>


----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200 (21:53:10 GMT)
Subject: Can I simply execute a REG file cleaned down to
a single value?

I mean, I have cleaned the 47KB "OE_No-Compact.reg" file, so its
size and contents are now just 374 bytes and:

--- OE_No-Compact.reg BEG ---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000
--- OE_No-Compact.reg END ---

Can I safely double-click that "OE_No-Compact.reg" file each
time I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, and
remain sure that this will alter nothing else in the OE key?

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:31:40 +0200 (21:31:40 GMT)
Subject: I mean a single VALUE, without altering the rest
of the KEY

Thanks Ramesh, but this only enables me to reset a whole *key*
(for instance the whole OE key); I would like to reset only the
"Compact Check Count" *value*.

This is what I do:

Start > Run > RegEdit >
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0

The above is the path for the OE *key*; then in the right pane
I highlight the name of the Compact Check Count *value*.
Then "File > Export" and:

C:\My_Apps\Outlook Express\OE_No-Compact.reg"

but that file is 47KB and contains the whole OE key; if I
execute it later, it will obviously overwrite my whole OE key,
which I don't want at all; I want to be able later to overwrite
*only the Compact Check Count value*.

May be I can do that by empying the 47KB file from everything
unless the involved line:

"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000001

but before altering the Registry I would like to be sure, not to
try. Do you know how I do? TIA,

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:31:40 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:06:01 +0530 (17:36:01 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Michel,

You can modify a single value using a .REG file.

See here:

How to add, modify, or delete registry subkeys and values by
using a registration entries (.reg) file:
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/310516/

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a simple
file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
M

Michel Merlin

This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Saturday 2 September 2006 13:21
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin said:
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, here's a cute little Reg file I produced last century.
-------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell]
@="edit"

----------------------------------------------------------------
It changes the default action for double clicking a REG file to
edit instead of merge. Since it starts with REGEDIT4 it will
work on all Windows versions. (Those starting with "Windows
Registry Editor Version 5.00" won't work in Win9x.)

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
R

Ramesh, MS-MVP

Thanks for the confirmation that my REG file won't change or delete

But I did miss the post, stuck on your previous post, and started replying
to that.

I never said that an authorship can be freely stolen ( when it is not
"big"). I think you're now concluding the wrong way. If you think i've
stolen your work, (which I've not), then I'm sorry. This will be my last
post to this thread.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


Thanks for the confirmation that my REG file won't change or
delete anything else.

« I did not see your 3rd post (which contained a .REG info)
when I replied »

Given your (implicit) claim about reading "the whole" KB310516,
I didn't think you had missed my post, 6h earlier and only
2 lines above.

« Do you think creating a REG file is a big invention? »

Even if not surprising, it's disturbing to see MS people (staff
or "volunteers") implying that others' authorship (or other
property) could be freely stolen in a case or another (for
instance, when it is not "big").

PS. The dates of the 2 parent messages of 14 Jun (ajocius' Q and
Frank's A) are really the ones that appear in my OE (thread
pane, and messages headers), the error (order inversed) is not
mine.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:58:50 +0200
 
V

V Green

Stop changing the Subject line.

It is becoming impossible to figure out
what you're talking about.


Michel Merlin said:
This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Saturday 2 September 2006 13:21
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin said:
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, here's a cute little Reg file I produced last century.
-------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell]
@="edit"

----------------------------------------------------------------
It changes the default action for double clicking a REG file to
edit instead of merge. Since it starts with REGEDIT4 it will
work on all Windows versions. (Those starting with "Windows
Registry Editor Version 5.00" won't work in Win9x.)

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
T

Tom Willett

It's also impossible to read his inane rambling.

V Green said:
Stop changing the Subject line.

It is becoming impossible to figure out
what you're talking about.


Michel Merlin said:
This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Saturday 2 September 2006 13:21
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin said:
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, here's a cute little Reg file I produced last century.
-------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell]
@="edit"

----------------------------------------------------------------
It changes the default action for double clicking a REG file to
edit instead of merge. Since it starts with REGEDIT4 it will
work on all Windows versions. (Those starting with "Windows
Registry Editor Version 5.00" won't work in Win9x.)

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
R

Rock

Michel said:
This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

This is usenet, not a forum. But more importantly you are way off base
in your conclusions Michel. Only you can say why you've suddenly got
this burr up your behind, but accusing people with no substance behind
it is wrong. Multiple posters tried to help you here; you did your best
to insult and alienate them.
 
M

Michel Merlin

I regret this collective, strong, consistent, deliberate and
determined, effort at disparaging anything I submit - most
probably with racialo-political goal, to overshadow my
propositions and prevent any normal and polite discussion about
them.

« This is usenet, not a forum »

Playing words in order to overshadow my pointing Ramesh's
arrogance.

« you are way off base in your conclusions Michel »

Curious that some hords can throw insults and accusations
without any reason or proof or quote, yet without being accused
of being biased and negative. Which tends to think they are
driven by racialo-politic orders and agenda. What's funny is
their swapping roles, targetting *me*, without laughing, with
the accusation of "accusing people with no substance" :)

« Stop changing the Subject line »

I don't know if I must believe the (repetitive) author of this
stupidity would be really thinking what he says. If ever it was
the case (I doubt - it's more probably another posturing as dumb
to better attempt at me for political reasons), then please
think for a second of what are the Subject of a Forum or Thread,
the Title of a message, and what are the use of *Message-ID* and
*References* in message headers, of "OE > View > Current View >
Group Messages by Conversation", and of Button 4 in OETools
http://www.oehelp.com/OETool/Default.aspx

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

This is usenet, not a forum. But more importantly you are way
off base in your conclusions Michel. Only you can say why
you've suddenly got this burr up your behind, but accusing
people with no substance behind it is wrong. Multiple posters
tried to help you here; you did your best to insult and alienate
them.

--
Rock
MS MVP Windows - Shell/User


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Tom Willett" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:38:29 -0500 (20:38:29 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

It's also impossible to read his inane rambling.


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 12:50:02 -0700 (19:50:02 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

Stop changing the Subject line.

It is becoming impossible to figure out what you're talking
about.



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200 (13:59:15 GMT)
Subject: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the wrong
way

This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Saturday 2 September 2006 13:21
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin said:
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, here's a cute little Reg file I produced last century.
-------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell]
@="edit"

----------------------------------------------------------------
It changes the default action for double clicking a REG file to
edit instead of merge. Since it starts with REGEDIT4 it will
work on all Windows versions. (Those starting with "Windows
Registry Editor Version 5.00" won't work in Win9x.)

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
V

V Green

The rest of you, have at it.

I'm done with this fool.

Michel Merlin said:
I regret this collective, strong, consistent, deliberate and
determined, effort at disparaging anything I submit - most
probably with racialo-political goal, to overshadow my
propositions and prevent any normal and polite discussion about
them.

« This is usenet, not a forum »

Playing words in order to overshadow my pointing Ramesh's
arrogance.

« you are way off base in your conclusions Michel »

Curious that some hords can throw insults and accusations
without any reason or proof or quote, yet without being accused
of being biased and negative. Which tends to think they are
driven by racialo-politic orders and agenda. What's funny is
their swapping roles, targetting *me*, without laughing, with
the accusation of "accusing people with no substance" :)

« Stop changing the Subject line »

I don't know if I must believe the (repetitive) author of this
stupidity would be really thinking what he says. If ever it was
the case (I doubt - it's more probably another posturing as dumb
to better attempt at me for political reasons), then please
think for a second of what are the Subject of a Forum or Thread,
the Title of a message, and what are the use of *Message-ID* and
*References* in message headers, of "OE > View > Current View >
Group Messages by Conversation", and of Button 4 in OETools
http://www.oehelp.com/OETool/Default.aspx

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

This is usenet, not a forum. But more importantly you are way
off base in your conclusions Michel. Only you can say why
you've suddenly got this burr up your behind, but accusing
people with no substance behind it is wrong. Multiple posters
tried to help you here; you did your best to insult and alienate
them.

--
Rock
MS MVP Windows - Shell/User


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Tom Willett" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:38:29 -0500 (20:38:29 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

It's also impossible to read his inane rambling.


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 12:50:02 -0700 (19:50:02 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

Stop changing the Subject line.

It is becoming impossible to figure out what you're talking
about.



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200 (13:59:15 GMT)
Subject: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the wrong
way

This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Saturday 2 September 2006 13:21
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin said:
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, here's a cute little Reg file I produced last century.
-------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell]
@="edit"

----------------------------------------------------------------
It changes the default action for double clicking a REG file to
edit instead of merge. Since it starts with REGEDIT4 it will
work on all Windows versions. (Those starting with "Windows
Registry Editor Version 5.00" won't work in Win9x.)

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
R

Rock

Michel said:
I regret this collective, strong, consistent, deliberate and
determined, effort at disparaging anything I submit - most
probably with racialo-political goal, to overshadow my
propositions and prevent any normal and polite discussion about
them.

« This is usenet, not a forum »

Playing words in order to overshadow my pointing Ramesh's
arrogance.

« you are way off base in your conclusions Michel »

Curious that some hords can throw insults and accusations
without any reason or proof or quote, yet without being accused
of being biased and negative. Which tends to think they are
driven by racialo-politic orders and agenda. What's funny is
their swapping roles, targetting *me*, without laughing, with
the accusation of "accusing people with no substance" :)

« Stop changing the Subject line »

I don't know if I must believe the (repetitive) author of this
stupidity would be really thinking what he says. If ever it was
the case (I doubt - it's more probably another posturing as dumb
to better attempt at me for political reasons), then please
think for a second of what are the Subject of a Forum or Thread,
the Title of a message, and what are the use of *Message-ID* and
*References* in message headers, of "OE > View > Current View >
Group Messages by Conversation", and of Button 4 in OETools
http://www.oehelp.com/OETool/Default.aspx

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

This is usenet, not a forum. But more importantly you are way
off base in your conclusions Michel. Only you can say why
you've suddenly got this burr up your behind, but accusing
people with no substance behind it is wrong. Multiple posters
tried to help you here; you did your best to insult and alienate
them.

Oh my...lol.."racialo-political goal"... Wow, are the meds wearing off
here? Have at it Michel, I'm done with this thread as well.
 
M

Michel Merlin

Please readers don't be diverted from the subject by dirty
tricks from Rock (MVP), V Green, Tom Willett, Ramesh (MS-MVP),
Frank Saunders (MS-MVP OE), just apply
my post of Fri 1 Sep 2006 21:53:10 GMT
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
that they so strongly persist to overshadow (going as far as
avoiding to reply it directly, and, using futile pretext, to
copy my file under their names).

Here is the resulting advice:

To prevent data losses in OE, the 1st thing to do is to prevent
OE from forcing compaction against your will. For this, just
periodically reset to zero the "Compact Check Count" in
Registry.

To do that conveniently:
(Warning: this must be working and harmless, but the testing
I intent to do hasn't been done yet):

1) open a New Text document, name it "OE_No-Compact.reg"
2) fill it with the following contents (without the 2 fences
marked with "=" signs, but with the final blank line):

===== OE_No-Compact.reg BEG =====
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

===== OE_No-Compact.reg END =====

3) replace "guid" with the actual number you find in the
relevant place in the registry
4) save the file
5) Double-click that file

Redo (5) once a month (or accordingly to your use), so to
prevent that "CCC" (Compact Check Count) from approaching 100
(it grows by 1 each time OE closes).

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 23:12:26 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 06:12:26 GMT)
Subject: Re: Group Messages by Conversation (which uses Indexes,
not Subjects or Titles)

Oh my...lol.."racialo-political goal"... Wow, are the meds
wearing off here? Have at it Michel, I'm done with this thread
as well.

--
Rock
MS MVP Windows - Shell/User


----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 18:36:56 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 01:36:56 GMT)
Subject: Re: Group Messages by Conversation (which uses Indexes,
not Subjects or Titles)

The rest of you, have at it.

I'm done with this fool.


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200 (00:33:50 GMT)
Subject: Group Messages by Conversation (which uses Indexes,
not Subjects or Titles)

I regret this collective, strong, consistent, deliberate and
determined, effort at disparaging anything I submit - most
probably with racialo-political goal, to overshadow my
propositions and prevent any normal and polite discussion about
them.

« This is usenet, not a forum »

Playing words in order to overshadow my pointing Ramesh's
arrogance.

« you are way off base in your conclusions Michel »

Curious that some hords can throw insults and accusations
without any reason or proof or quote, yet without being accused
of being biased and negative. Which tends to think they are
driven by racialo-politic orders and agenda. What's funny is
their swapping roles, targetting *me*, without laughing, with
the accusation of "accusing people with no substance" :)

« Stop changing the Subject line »

I don't know if I must believe the (repetitive) author of this
stupidity would be really thinking what he says. If ever it was
the case (I doubt - it's more probably another posturing as dumb
to better attempt at me for political reasons), then please
think for a second of what are the Subject of a Forum or Thread,
the Title of a message, and what are the use of *Message-ID* and
*References* in message headers, of "OE > View > Current View >
Group Messages by Conversation", and of Button 4 in OETools
http://www.oehelp.com/OETool/Default.aspx

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

This is usenet, not a forum. But more importantly you are way
off base in your conclusions Michel. Only you can say why
you've suddenly got this burr up your behind, but accusing
people with no substance behind it is wrong. Multiple posters
tried to help you here; you did your best to insult and alienate
them.

--
Rock
MS MVP Windows - Shell/User


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Tom Willett" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:38:29 -0500 (20:38:29 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

It's also impossible to read his inane rambling.


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 12:50:02 -0700 (19:50:02 GMT)
Subject: Re: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the
wrong way

Stop changing the Subject line.

It is becoming impossible to figure out what you're talking
about.



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200 (13:59:15 GMT)
Subject: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the wrong
way

This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200 (11:21:25 GMT)
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin wrote
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, here's a cute little Reg file I produced last century.
-------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\regfile\shell]
@="edit"

----------------------------------------------------------------
It changes the default action for double clicking a REG file to
edit instead of merge. Since it starts with REGEDIT4 it will
work on all Windows versions. (Those starting with "Windows
Registry Editor Version 5.00" won't work in Win9x.)

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200 (21:53:10 GMT)
Subject: Can I simply execute a REG file cleaned down to
a single value?

I mean, I have cleaned the 47KB "OE_No-Compact.reg" file, so its
size and contents are now just 374 bytes and:

--- OE_No-Compact.reg BEG ---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000
--- OE_No-Compact.reg END ---

Can I safely double-click that "OE_No-Compact.reg" file each
time I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, and
remain sure that this will alter nothing else in the OE key?

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
M

Michel Merlin

« stop changing the subject of a thread »

You appear to not read the posts to which you think you are
"replying" (also see Mon 4 Sep 2006 09:19:10 GMT
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
"Please read b4 posting - and *Group Messages by Conversation*")

« If you save compactcheck.vbs to your hard-drive,
right-click on it and select Edit, you can /see/ what
it contains, Michel »

Please don't assume everyone is like you, Robear: regular people
won't reply without reading; and of course won't talk about a
VBS like I did, without having at least opened and read it!

And since you didn't read my reply, I repeat: « after some
experience in the past years I don't want to execute programs
coming from MS NGs afficionados when they are published without
even an explanation », and I precise: by "MS NGs afficionados" I
had in mind *MVPs (Most Vocal Posters)*, by "even an
explanation" I meant at least a precise explanation, better with
a precise test report, even if short.

Anyway as you would know if reading before posting, the VBS is
now useless since the REG I proposed Fri 1 Sep 2006 21:53:10 GMT
is better (simpler, appears to do the job, probably safer).

Paris, Mon 4 Sep 2006 11:38:20 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "PA Bear" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 17:01:05 -0400 (21:01:05 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - I would prefer a REG, but a VBS can do if
with sufficient backing

*Please* stop changing the subject of a thread when you reply to
it. Thank you.

If you save compactcheck.vbs to your hard-drive, right-click on
it and select Edit, you can /see/ what it contains, Michel.
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-Windows (IE/OE, Security, Shell/User)



----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:35:35 +0200 (09:35:35 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - I would prefer a REG, but a VBS can do if with
sufficient backing

Thanks Robear

However after some experience in the past years I don't want to
execute programs coming from MS NGs afficionados when they are
published without even an explanation - if not, as here, with in
addition a disclaimer excluding any responsibility; there is too
high probability that this is fast-written little-thought code.

This one of the reasons why I would prefer a REG file. Of course
if not sure mine is harmless, I would think of using your VBS,
but please in this case provide more arguments for its
reliability and unharmlessness.

PS. Franck's later reply meanwhile released the fear I could
have to execute my REG file, so I will chose the REG.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:35:35 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "PA Bear" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:30:56 -0400 (22:30:56 GMT)
Subject: Re: I mean a single VALUE, without altering the rest
of the KEY

Should I mention?...

OE - Reset Compact Check Count to 0 (Line 367, Left)
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm

Nah. <w>


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200 (21:53:10 GMT)
Subject: Can I simply execute a REG file cleaned down to
a single value?

I mean, I have cleaned the 47KB "OE_No-Compact.reg" file, so its
size and contents are now just 374 bytes and:

--- OE_No-Compact.reg BEG ---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000
--- OE_No-Compact.reg END ---

Can I safely double-click that "OE_No-Compact.reg" file each
time I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, and
remain sure that this will alter nothing else in the OE key?

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:31:40 +0200 (21:31:40 GMT)
Subject: I mean a single VALUE, without altering the rest
of the KEY

Thanks Ramesh, but this only enables me to reset a whole *key*
(for instance the whole OE key); I would like to reset only the
"Compact Check Count" *value*.

....................
 
C

cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)

On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200, "Michel Merlin"

Geez, Merlin; stay in the same thread, will you? Gah! :)
I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful

In the Win9x days, Regedit had a known bug that if there was no blank
line at the end, the last real line of the file is not applied. Or to
put it a different way; the last line of a .REG is ignored in Win9x.

I don't know whether XP still has this bug, but if you find you don't
get the results you expect when merging in a .REG, that may be why.

In which case, that extra line is the reason why his works and yours
doesn't, and that is good value to add ;-)


------------ ----- --- -- - - - -
Drugs are usually safe. Inject? (Y/n)
 
M

Michel Merlin

TO READERS: "cquirke", by replying to an older and secondary post, is looking (despite using Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.646) like unable to get a threaded display of the conversation and to read the important ones. Please don't be diverted, read (in that order and depending on your free time) the "===== Conclusion =====", "===== Proposition =====" and "===== Question =====" below; you may skip the rest of this post.

--ooOOoo--

« Geez, Merlin; stay in the same thread, will you? Gah! :) »

This has been answered plenty times. If you are unable to see the difference between a thread and a message, and the need for an accurate title for each message, then please search this newsgroup for replies from me this month.

« the last line of a .REG is ignored in Win9x »

Thanks for this useful explanation.

« In which case, that extra line is the reason why
his works and yours doesn't, and that is good value to add ;-) »

First, nothing so far proves mine wouldn't work, particularly in W2K or WXP. Second, what is honest is to say he corrected my file. But presenting the resulting file as theirs, without mentioning mine, was dishonest. And supporting them now, after the explanations (that you aptly omit to refer, going as far as posting after an older message in order to overshadow my conclusion "How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption"), is still more dishonest. A theft is a theft, no matter if big or small, intellectual or material.

Paris, Mon 11 Sep 2006 01:30:15 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user)" <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 2.0/32.646
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 09 Sep 2006 15:30:17 +0200 (13:30:17 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours, provided he changes a character

On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200, "Michel Merlin"

Geez, Merlin; stay in the same thread, will you? Gah! :)
I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take
a file from you and, if he finds a character that he can
harmlessly change (for instance adding a blank line), even if
not apparently useful

In the Win9x days, Regedit had a known bug that if there was no blank line at the end, the last real line of the file is not applied. Or to put it a different way; the last line of a .REG is ignored in Win9x.

I don't know whether XP still has this bug, but if you find you don't get the results you expect when merging in a .REG, that may be why.

In which case, that extra line is the reason why his works and yours doesn't, and that is good value to add ;-)
------------ ----- --- -- - - - -
Drugs are usually safe. Inject? (Y/n)
------------ ----- --- -- - - - -


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Saturday 2 September 2006 13:21
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours, provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


===== Conclusion =====

----- Related Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
message Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200 (14:09:40 GMT)
Subject: How to prevent OE compaction (and resulting folder corruption)

Please readers don't be diverted from the subject by dirty tricks from Rock (MVP), V Green, Tom Willett, Ramesh (MS-MVP), Frank Saunders (MS-MVP OE), just apply my post of Fri 1 Sep 2006 21:53:10 GMT news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected] that they so strongly persist to overshadow (going as far as avoiding to reply it directly, and, using futile pretext, to copy my file under their names).

Here is the resulting advice:

To prevent data losses in OE, the 1st thing to do is to prevent OE from forcing compaction against your will. For this, just periodically reset to zero the "Compact Check Count" in Registry.

To do that conveniently:
(Warning: this must be working and harmless, but the testing I intent to do hasn't been done yet):

1) open a New Text document, name it "OE_No-Compact.reg"
2) fill it with the following contents (without the 2 fences
marked with "=" signs, but with the final blank line):

===== OE_No-Compact.reg BEG =====
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

===== OE_No-Compact.reg END =====

3) replace "guid" with the actual number you find in the
relevant place in the registry
4) save the file
5) Double-click that file

Redo (5) once a month (or accordingly to your use), so to prevent that "CCC" (Compact Check Count) from approaching 100 (it grows by 1 each time OE closes).

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 23:12:26 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 06:12:26 GMT)
From: "Rock" MS MVP Windows - Shell/User


----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 18:36:56 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 01:36:56 GMT)
From: "V Green"

----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200 (00:33:50 GMT)
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Subject: Group Messages by Conversation (which uses Indexes, not Subjects or Titles)

I regret this collective, strong, consistent, deliberate and determined, effort at disparaging anything I submit - most probably with racialo-political goal, to overshadow my propositions and prevent any normal and polite discussion about them.
.........................

« Stop changing the Subject line »

I don't know if I must believe the (repetitive) author of this stupidity would be really thinking what he says. If ever it was the case (I doubt - it's more probably another posturing as dumb to better attempt at me for political reasons), then please think for a second of what are the Subject of a Forum or Thread, the Title of a message, and what are the use of *Message-ID* and *References* in message headers, of "OE > View > Current View > Group Messages by Conversation", and of Button 4 in OETools http://www.oehelp.com/OETool/Default.aspx

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
From: "Rock" MS MVP Windows - Shell/User


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:38:29 -0500 (20:38:29 GMT)
From: "Tom Willett"


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 12:50:02 -0700 (19:50:02 GMT)
From: "V Green"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200 (13:59:15 GMT)
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Subject: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the wrong way


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP"

.................


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200 (11:21:25 GMT)
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours, provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin wrote
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that everybody does.

.......................


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave » is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS (Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave it would be more specifically for WinXP: Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end. Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge. Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/O%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 09:31:43 +0530 (04:01:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: I mean a single VALUE, without altering the rest
of the KEY

Michel,

Did you read the whole article? Use this REG file:

- - -
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

- - -

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


===== Proposition =====
----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200 (21:53:10 GMT)
Subject: Can I simply execute a REG file cleaned down to
a single value?

I mean, I have cleaned the 47KB "OE_No-Compact.reg" file, so its size and contents are now just 374 bytes and:

--- OE_No-Compact.reg BEG ---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000
--- OE_No-Compact.reg END ---

Can I safely double-click that "OE_No-Compact.reg" file each time I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, and remain sure that this will alter nothing else in the OE key?

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200


===== Question =====
----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

......................
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key, not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200
 
M

Michel Merlin

My warning in my post of Sun 3 Sep 2006 14:09:40 GMT can be removed, after I just made the tests. So my REG file does work reliably where it is intended so (i.e. in Windows XP SP2 fully updated, currently around IE 6.0.2900.2180, OE 6.00.2900.2180, depending on language, Home or Pro, ....). Here are the details.

--ooOOoo--

My REG file works, either with the trailing blank line (in facts 2 "CR"s), or without (just one Carriage Return), or with nothing after the last "0" in "...dword:00000000" (thus zero "CR").

Which confirms that, as anyone could guess, the "argument" from Frank Saunders (MS-MVP OE) to help himself and Ramesh (MS-MVP) stealing my file, was simply that, an "argument" for theft, that himself obviously didn't believe.

--ooOOoo--

BTW, in W2K US full updated to 18 Sep 2006 (thus SP4, IE 6.00.2800.1106, OE 6.00.2800.1807), the OE registry key:

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]

doesn't contain the "Compact Check Count" value at all, and OE when closing, doesn't propose Compaction. So, this massive data loss ordered by OE (through a Compaction at closing that most often will be interrupted), is apparently one more aggravation of the security brought in WXP by its SP2 - and one more instance where WXP SP2 is a backstep from W2K, in general efficiency, and particularly in security - while *in name of Security*! Too bad that MS people (from managers to "volunteers") are arrogant and stubborn to the point of not recognize this blunder and correct it.

Also notice in W2K that the line "Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00" is unchanged, then it's better IMO to not follow Frank Saunders' Sat 2 Sep 2006 09:50:06 GMT suggestion of changing it into "REGEDIT4".

Paris, Wed 20 Sep 2006 10:32:45 +0200


----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200 (14:09:40 GMT)
Subject: How to prevent OE compaction (and resulting folder corruption)

Please readers don't be diverted from the subject ...,
just apply my post of Fri 1 Sep 2006 21:53:10 GMT
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
....

Here is the resulting advice:

To prevent data losses in OE, the 1st thing to do is to prevent
OE from forcing compaction against your will. For this, just
periodically reset to zero the "Compact Check Count" in
Registry.

To do that conveniently:
(Warning: this must be working and harmless, but the testing
I intent to do hasn't been done yet):

1) open a New Text document, name it "OE_No-Compact.reg"
2) fill it with the following contents (without the 2 fences
marked with "=" signs, but with the final blank line):

===== OE_No-Compact.reg BEG =====
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

===== OE_No-Compact.reg END =====

3) replace "guid" with the actual number you find in the
relevant place in the registry
4) save the file
5) Double-click that file

Redo (5) once a month (or accordingly to your use), so to
prevent that "CCC" (Compact Check Count) from approaching 100
(it grows by 1 each time OE closes).

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Message: Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 23:12:26 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 06:12:26 GMT)
................

----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 18:36:56 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 01:36:56 GMT)
................


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200 (00:33:50 GMT)
................


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
................


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Tom Willett" <[email protected]>
Message: Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:38:29 -0500 (20:38:29 GMT)
................


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 12:50:02 -0700 (19:50:02 GMT)
................


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200 (13:59:15 GMT)
Subject: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the wrong
way

This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200 (11:21:25 GMT)
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin wrote
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, .............


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200 (21:53:10 GMT)
Subject: Can I simply execute a REG file cleaned down to
a single value?

I mean, I have cleaned the 47KB "OE_No-Compact.reg" file, so its
size and contents are now just 374 bytes and:

--- OE_No-Compact.reg BEG ---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000
--- OE_No-Compact.reg END ---

Can I safely double-click that "OE_No-Compact.reg" file each
time I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, and
remain sure that this will alter nothing else in the OE key?

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
O

Oliver

Oh, wow man, what a relief!!! Everyones been really worried about it...been
talking about it all week!



My warning in my post of Sun 3 Sep 2006 14:09:40 GMT can be removed, after I
just made the tests. So my REG file does work reliably where it is intended
so (i.e. in Windows XP SP2 fully updated, currently around IE 6.0.2900.2180,
OE 6.00.2900.2180, depending on language, Home or Pro, ...). Here are the
details.

--ooOOoo--

My REG file works, either with the trailing blank line (in facts 2 "CR"s),
or without (just one Carriage Return), or with nothing after the last "0" in
"...dword:00000000" (thus zero "CR").

Which confirms that, as anyone could guess, the "argument" from Frank
Saunders (MS-MVP OE) to help himself and Ramesh (MS-MVP) stealing my file,
was simply that, an "argument" for theft, that himself obviously didn't
believe.

--ooOOoo--

BTW, in W2K US full updated to 18 Sep 2006 (thus SP4, IE 6.00.2800.1106, OE
6.00.2800.1807), the OE registry key:

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]

doesn't contain the "Compact Check Count" value at all, and OE when closing,
doesn't propose Compaction. So, this massive data loss ordered by OE
(through a Compaction at closing that most often will be interrupted), is
apparently one more aggravation of the security brought in WXP by its SP2 -
and one more instance where WXP SP2 is a backstep from W2K, in general
efficiency, and particularly in security - while *in name of Security*! Too
bad that MS people (from managers to "volunteers") are arrogant and stubborn
to the point of not recognize this blunder and correct it.

Also notice in W2K that the line "Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00" is
unchanged, then it's better IMO to not follow Frank Saunders' Sat 2 Sep 2006
09:50:06 GMT suggestion of changing it into "REGEDIT4".

Paris, Wed 20 Sep 2006 10:32:45 +0200


----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200 (14:09:40 GMT)
Subject: How to prevent OE compaction (and resulting folder corruption)

Please readers don't be diverted from the subject ...,
just apply my post of Fri 1 Sep 2006 21:53:10 GMT
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
....

Here is the resulting advice:

To prevent data losses in OE, the 1st thing to do is to prevent
OE from forcing compaction against your will. For this, just
periodically reset to zero the "Compact Check Count" in
Registry.

To do that conveniently:
(Warning: this must be working and harmless, but the testing
I intent to do hasn't been done yet):

1) open a New Text document, name it "OE_No-Compact.reg"
2) fill it with the following contents (without the 2 fences
marked with "=" signs, but with the final blank line):

===== OE_No-Compact.reg BEG =====
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

===== OE_No-Compact.reg END =====

3) replace "guid" with the actual number you find in the
relevant place in the registry
4) save the file
5) Double-click that file

Redo (5) once a month (or accordingly to your use), so to
prevent that "CCC" (Compact Check Count) from approaching 100
(it grows by 1 each time OE closes).

Paris, Sun 3 Sep 2006 16:09:40 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Message: Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 23:12:26 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 06:12:26 GMT)
................

----- Previous Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 18:36:56 -0700 (Sun 3 Sep 01:36:56 GMT)
................


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sun 3 Sep 2006 02:33:50 +0200 (00:33:50 GMT)
................


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Rock" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 02 Sep 2006 15:55:31 -0700 (22:55:31 GMT)
................


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Tom Willett" <[email protected]>
Message: Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:38:29 -0500 (20:38:29 GMT)
................


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "V Green" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 12:50:02 -0700 (19:50:02 GMT)
................


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200 (13:59:15 GMT)
Subject: Please read the thread, so to not conclude the wrong
way

This is a forum, not a classroom; the help flow is 2-way,
not oneway.

Those who feel never *receiving* help, most often are *giving*
less than others. Please read the thread, so to not conclude
the wrong way.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 15:59:15 +0200
Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge
(Charles Darwin)


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 17:49:44 +0530 (12:19:44 GMT)
Subject: Re: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

Posting a question, asking for help, and then suddenly making a
wrong accusation about someone who is trying to help. This
surprised me about you.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows XP Shell/User]
Windows® XP Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200 (11:21:25 GMT)
Subject: So anyone can claim authorship of a file of yours,
provided he changes a character

I keep in my records that you are allowing anyone to take a file
from you and, if he finds a character that he can harmlessly
change (for instance adding a blank line), even if not
apparently useful ("I don't know why we put a blank line at the
end"), then he can omit to cite you, and present himself as the
only author instead.

This surprised me about you.

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 13:21:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 04:50:09 -0500 (09:50:06 GMT)
Subject: Re: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

Michel Merlin wrote
1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

No they aren't. His has a blank line at the end and yours
doesn't.
.............

I don't know why we put a blank line at the end. Just that
everybody does.

BTW, .............


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200 (09:36:25 GMT)
Subject: Thanks - Didn't remember the "Merge" option in REG
file, so no overwriting

1) « the one Ramesh gave »
is in facts *the one Michel Merlin gave*.

MS "volunteers" seem to be in a bad case of NIHS
(Not Invented Here Syndrom).

2)
« Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge »

Thanks for these 2 infos, very useful to me:

- I hadn't noticed the blank line at end;
- learning that there is a choice for "Merge" makes me
more comfortable executing that file of mine (even if
some risk remain anyway given experience...).

Paris, Sat 2 Sep 2006 11:36:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 02:21:55 -0500 (07:21:55 GMT)
Subject: Re: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

This one should work, although with the one Ramesh gave
it would be more specifically for WinXP:
Save the parts between the lines as compactCount.reg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
REGEDIT4

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Note that both mine and Ramesh' have a blank line at the end.
Close OE, right click compactCount.reg and choose Merge.
Also note that with the updates for OE that you have the
Compact Check Count will be set to zero every time you do a
File | Folder | Compact All.

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Intermediate Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200 (21:53:10 GMT)
Subject: Can I simply execute a REG file cleaned down to
a single value?

I mean, I have cleaned the 47KB "OE_No-Compact.reg" file, so its
size and contents are now just 374 bytes and:

--- OE_No-Compact.reg BEG ---
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00

[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{guid}\Software\Microsoft\Outlook
Express\5.0]
"Compact Check Count"=dword:00000000
--- OE_No-Compact.reg END ---

Can I safely double-click that "OE_No-Compact.reg" file each
time I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, and
remain sure that this will alter nothing else in the OE key?

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 23:53:10 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200 (16:41:25 GMT)
Subject: How to change a single value in Registry with a
simple file?

Thanks for this very useful fix.

Maybe you could help me for another one:
In "HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Identities\{GUID}\
Software\Microsoft\Outlook Express\5.0",
I want to reset the "Compact Check Count" to zero, with just
double-clicking a file.

Unfortunately with a REG file I know how to change a whole key,
not a single value. Maybe by just removing al but the said value
in the key? But for acting in Registry, I prefer asking than
trying.

If you could show me how to build the file for "Compact Check
Count", it would greatly help me (for this example and later
ones).

Paris, Fri 1 Sep 2006 18:41:25 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:07:43 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:07:43 GMT)
Subject: Re: XP And My Mouse

Search or Command Prompt opens when double clicking a folder
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/scripts_desc/xp_folder_open.htm

--
Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE/WM
Reply in newsgroup
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary
security, deserve neither liberty or security"


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "ajocius" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 14 Jun 2006 20:30:33 -0500 (Thu 15 Jun 01:30:33 GMT)
Subject: XP And My Mouse

Group,
I have XP Home and my mouse act a bit funny. When I
double-click a folder, instead of opening the folder, I get the
Serarch Results box which is what I would use if I wanted to
fine a file or folder. But if I right-click and select Open,
the folder opens. What do I do to correct this. I went to the
Logitech driver and could not find a reasonable setting that
makes this happen. Your thoughts on fixing this problem.

Tony
 
M

Michel Merlin

Obviously there are some people (here "Oliver") in charge of ridiculing everything I may try to post, bloating and diverting the threads where I post. Just see around how many others are infinitely posting the same useless discussions and void or wrong messages while being never assaulted as I am.

Paris, Thu 21 Sep 2006 12:43:15 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Oliver" <none>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/OQ4%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 20 Sep 2006 08:51:59 -0500 (13:51:59 GMT)
Subject: Re: Tested OK (How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption)

Oh, wow man, what a relief!!! Everyones been really worried about it...been talking about it all week!


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 20 Sep 2006 10:32:45 +0200 (08:32:45 GMT)
Subject: Tested OK (How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption)

My warning in my post of Sun 3 Sep 2006 14:09:40 GMT can be removed, after I just made the tests. So my REG file does work reliably where it is intended..............
 
F

Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE

Obviously there are some people (here "Oliver") in charge of ridiculing
everything I may try to post, bloating and diverting the threads where I
post. Just see around how many others are infinitely posting the same
useless discussions and void or wrong messages while being never assaulted
as I am.


Oliver didn't post anything deserving of receiving an "assault", unlike
some.
 
M

Michel Merlin

Oliver didn't make « an "assault" » by himself alone, yet he clearly took part in one, with others including yourself. If not an assault, what have you both as reasons to post here? Mine was to complete a helpful information, then to defend myself against constant unfair attacks, as yours; you have none - excepted deliberate agression (with stealing and lying as I demonstrated earlier).

I regret this contstant intention to dilute, denature, ridicule, anything I post, with myriads useless, hostile, and dishonest posts, in a process you are participating here. I can't see any other reason than racialo-political; else, which one? If no such agenda, wouldn't it be more pleasant and productive (and shorter) to simply exchange normally?

I am ready (as always) for gentleman conversation; OTOH please readers understand me if I don't always reply to the opposite that unfortunately will instead most probably follow here as usual.

Paris, Thu 21 Sep 2006 22:26:30 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: Sent: Thu 21 Sep 2006 13:55:50 -0500 (18:55:50 GMT)
Subject: Re: Stop polluting please

Oliver didn't post anything deserving of receiving an "assault", unlike some.

--
Frank


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Thu 21 Sep 2006 12:43:15 +0200 (10:43:15 GMT)
Subject: Stop polluting please

Obviously there are some people (here "Oliver") in charge of ridiculing everything I may try to post, bloating and diverting the threads where I post. Just see around how many others are infinitely posting the same useless discussions and void or wrong messages while being never assaulted as I am.

Paris, Thu 21 Sep 2006 12:43:15 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Oliver" <none>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/OQ4%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 20 Sep 2006 08:51:59 -0500 (13:51:59 GMT)
Subject: Re: Tested OK (How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption)

Oh, wow man, what a relief!!! Everyones been really worried about it...been talking about it all week!


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 20 Sep 2006 10:32:45 +0200 (08:32:45 GMT)
Subject: Tested OK (How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption)

My warning in my post of Sun 3 Sep 2006 14:09:40 GMT can be removed, after I just made the tests. So my REG file does work reliably where it is intended..............
 
K

Kerry Brown

The funny thing is this whole thread is about a reg file that will
ultimately do more harm than good. Not allowing OE to compact the email
store will eventually cause corruption. The reason Microsoft enforced
compaction is to stop this corruption. Too many people put it off until the
email store was corrupted. Using the reg file or any other method to delay
compaction may be safe in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing
and merely postponing compaction until it is convenient. Someone who doesn't
understand the consequences and uses the reg file to delay compaction too
long will eventually experience a corrupted email store.
 
M

Michel Merlin

The funny thing is this whole message is about an infinitely repeated yet never reality-checked authoritative statement that has been proved to do more harm than good. Not reading threads before "answering" will eventually cause irrelevant posts. The reason so many people have intensively used OE for 8 years without corruption is they systematically refused compaction; the reason so many others have sufferred dramatic loss of their assets is they unduly trusted the reckless advices from superficial people too confident of themselves. Too many MS people put customers off until they were blind to reality. Using scorning posts or any other method to delay checking reality may be safe in the hands of someone who doesn't know what they are doing and merely postponing thinking until it is too late. Someone who doesn't understand the consequences and uses the Send button to delay thinking too long will eventually experience a corrupted news group.

The problem is as old as humans: the more someone is dumb and ignorant, thus the more he fails to understand others, hence the more he thinks they are still dumber and more ignorant than he is. Among people in a large company (e.g. MS people, from managers to "volunteers"), the best ones will be modest, helpful, constantly and really listening to customers, spending more time in researching and thinking than in speaking; while the lowest ones will be so sure of themselves that they can publicly repeat 10 times a week, without ever thinking, things they never realized are the opposite to facts. Said Charles Darwin: « Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge » (in modern words: arrogance more often denotes ignorance than knowledge).

PS. May be you could read before posting; here are just a few posts you may check (I made links clickable, to ease checking for people who usually don't check what they are talking about):

1) "Reality check on data losses due to compaction in OE", and its "PS." and its *eight* "DATA LOSS REPORTS":
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 08:00:55 GMT
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress

2) "Reality check on Users' demand for Control over their OE compaction" and its *nine* "USERS' Requests for CONTROL over compaction"
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Sat 2 Sep 2006 18:39:50 GMT
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general

3) "Massive data loss after OE Compaction WITHOUT SHUT DOWN"
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%23%237s%[email protected]
Sent: Sun 10 Sep 23:29:40 GMT
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windows.inetexplorer.ie6_outlookexpress

4) Another Massive data loss caused by Compaction at OE closing, again without user mistake
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Mon 18 Sep 23:37:35 GMT
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.outlookexpress.general

Paris, Fri 22 Sep 2006 08:32:35 +0200


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Kerry Brown" <[email protected]*a*m>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%232zQl%[email protected]
Sent: Thu 21 Sep 2006 13:50:59 -0700 (20:50:59 GMT)
Subject: Re: Frank Saunders too, stop polluting please

The funny thing is this whole thread is about a reg file that will ultimately do more harm than good. Not allowing OE to compact the email store will eventually cause corruption. The reason Microsoft enforced compaction is to stop this corruption. Too many people put it off until the email store was corrupted. Using the reg file or any other method to delay compaction may be safe in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing and merely postponing compaction until it is convenient. Someone who doesn't understand the consequences and uses the reg file to delay compaction too long will eventually experience a corrupted email store.

--
Kerry
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User
http://www.vistahelp.ca


----- Parent Message (links are clickable) -----
From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Newsgroup: news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsoft.public.windowsxp.general
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/%[email protected]
Sent: Thu 21 Sep 2006 22:26:30 +0200 (20:26:30 GMT)
Subject: Frank Saunders too, stop polluting please

Oliver didn't make « an "assault" » by himself alone, yet he clearly took part in one, with others including yourself...
.............


----- Parent Messages -----
From: "Frank Saunders, MS-MVP OE" <[email protected]>
Message: Sent: Thu 21 Sep 2006 13:55:50 -0500 (18:55:50 GMT)
Subject: Re: Stop polluting please

............

From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Thu 21 Sep 2006 12:43:15 +0200 (10:43:15 GMT)
Subject: Stop polluting please

...............

From: "Oliver" <none>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/OQ4%[email protected]
Sent: Wed 20 Sep 2006 08:51:59 -0500 (13:51:59 GMT)
Subject: Re: Tested OK (How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption)

...............


From: "Michel Merlin" <[email protected]>
Message: news://msnews.microsoft.com/[email protected]
Sent: Wed 20 Sep 2006 10:32:45 +0200 (08:32:45 GMT)
Subject: Tested OK (How to prevent OE compaction and resulting folder corruption)

My warning in my post of Sun 3 Sep 2006 14:09:40 GMT can be removed, after I just made the tests. So my REG file does work reliably where it is intended..............
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top