WinXP SP2 Beta Version 2055

G

Guest

Cowboy, If your still reading this after the crappy way you've been treated....... I'm an unoffical tester too, and I solved the same problem you're having. Go to Network Connections and install the Client for Microsoft Networks. Then go to services and start Workstation, Background Intelligent Transfer, and Automatic Updates. The updates should then install.
 
G

Guest

----- somebody wrote: -----

Cowboy, If your still reading this after the crappy way you've been treated....... I'm an unoffical tester too, and I solved the same problem you're having. Go to Network Connections and install the Client for Microsoft Networks. Then go to services and start Workstation, Background Intelligent Transfer, and Automatic Updates. The updates should then install.

For some reason my last couple post didn't seem to make it. So agaim I will say Thank You SOMEBODY, THe Background Intelegence Transfer Service was the last piece of the puzzle I needed. Now the updates download with no problems. Now ya see Carey and Chris you were wrong, I did find the answer to my problem right here in this Newsgroup,,,,Of course that was with no help from you two. You two were to busy hoping Daddy Bill Gates would send you a present or something for being such ^&^%$&^^%$, you know what I mean don't ya? By the way Carey and Chris, ole Cowboys gonna stick around for awhile to help some of these people.
For the rest of the posters thank you for your support and helping me keep the faith it support groups.
 
R

Robert Moir

Chris said:
Since you
"found your answer" you may now leave without replaying to this
message. Your kind are not welcome here.

What "kind" were you thinking of as being unwelcome?
Microsoft customers?
Windows users?
MSDN subscribers?
People who occasionally ask a question in one forum or newsgroup when
another might be better?
People who get annoyed at being treated in a shabby manner for no good
reason that I can see.

I guess I had better unsubscribe then. I've done/been all the above.

Chris, with respect, I don't think its your place to tell people whether or
not they are welcome in a public newsgroup that isn't moderated at all, let
alone by you.

Cowboy, if you read this, I don't know what "your kind" is exactly as
described in the post I'm replying to, but as far as I'm concerned you are
welcome here.

--
 
S

shojo kid

John E. Carty wrote:
.........
.........
Hi John, Many thanks for that info, and for the link to the doc 'Changes
to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2' which is a bit
technical, but seems to give the picture. I have seen reference to
version 1a elsewhere, and wondered Is this a worthwhile download at all

Best
 
T

Tom Porterfield

shojo said:
Hi John, Many thanks for that info, and for the link to the doc
'Changes to Functionality in Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2'
which is a bit technical, but seems to give the picture. I have seen
reference to version 1a elsewhere, and wondered Is this a worthwhile
download at all

SP1a is exactly the same as SP1 but with the MS Java Virtual Machine
removed. So if you already have SP1 installed there is no reason to
download/install SP1a. See this link for info on why Microsoft is
removing the JVM from their products -
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/java/.
--
Tom Porterfield
MS-MVP Smart Display
http://support.telop.org

Please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup only.
 
G

Guest

Hi Robert,,,,your guess is as good as mine on what kind I am. I guess I am the kind that uses Miccrosoft Products, but won't take any crap from Morons. Thanks for your KIND words.
 
A

anonymous

Hey ****wit's wake up! You are stealing software. It
does not matter about your "no strings attached"
download. It's not YOURS.

There has been NOTHING WRONG with what anyone has said to
you. A ****wit as atupid as you asking for help with a
beta you SHOULD NOT HAVE.

What kind of dumbass are you? Why dont you leave and go
be a good "unoffical tester" (if there is such as thing)

These ****wit's get stupider with every beta M$ puts out.
 
S

shojo Kid

Tom said:
SP1a is exactly the same as SP1 but with the MS Java Virtual Machine
removed. So if you already have SP1 installed there is no reason to
download/install SP1a. See this link for info on why Microsoft is
removing the JVM from their products -
http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/java/.

I am most appreciative for the info

Very best wishes
 
S

shojo kid

anonymous said:
Hey ****wit's wake up! You are stealing software. It
does not matter about your "no strings attached"
download. It's not YOURS.

There has been NOTHING WRONG with what anyone has said to
you. A ****wit as atupid as you asking for help with a
beta you SHOULD NOT HAVE.

What kind of dumbass are you? Why dont you leave and go
be a good "unoffical tester" (if there is such as thing)

These ****wit's get stupider with every beta M$ puts out.
It's no good you hiding. Your post has Bill Gates written all over
 
R

Robert Moir

anonymous said:
Hey ****wit's wake up! You are stealing software. It
does not matter about your "no strings attached"
download. It's not YOURS.

Uh.. at no point did the poster say they warezed the download. That no
strings attatched download could be from MSDN as a MSDN subscriber. That
would make their downloading of SP2 legitimate. Its dangerous to assume too
much.
There has been NOTHING WRONG with what anyone has said to
you. A ****wit as atupid as you asking for help with a
beta you SHOULD NOT HAVE.

Said to me (as its me you are replying to). But I'm allowed to have it.
What kind of dumbass are you? Why dont you leave and go
be a good "unoffical tester" (if there is such as thing)

If you mean me again, as its me you are replying to, I'm an "Official
tester" (if there is such as[sic] thing).
These ****wit's get stupider with every beta M$ puts out.

I assume you mean yourself?
 
C

Chris Lanier

Hi, We had established that the OP had no MSDN subscription and was not a
valid tester. You all may continue this as long as you wish, but this is my
closing post.

The software is not yours. Do not come here to post for help or whatever
you want to call it until the software is released to the public.

-Relevance to Topics:XP SP2 is not relevant, as it has not been released to
the public.
-Confidentiality:All beta testers are always under non-disclosure
agreement's (NDA)

Robert Moir said:
anonymous said:
Hey ****wit's wake up! You are stealing software. It
does not matter about your "no strings attached"
download. It's not YOURS.

Uh.. at no point did the poster say they warezed the download. That no
strings attatched download could be from MSDN as a MSDN subscriber. That
would make their downloading of SP2 legitimate. Its dangerous to assume too
much.

There has been NOTHING WRONG with what anyone has said to
you. A ****wit as atupid as you asking for help with a
beta you SHOULD NOT HAVE.

Said to me (as its me you are replying to). But I'm allowed to have it.
What kind of dumbass are you? Why dont you leave and go
be a good "unoffical tester" (if there is such as thing)

If you mean me again, as its me you are replying to, I'm an "Official
tester" (if there is such as[sic] thing).
These ****wit's get stupider with every beta M$ puts out.

I assume you mean yourself?
 
G

Guest

{The software is not yours. Do not come here to post for help or whateve
you want to call it until the software is released to the public} Kiss my ass Chris, this is an open Newsgroup. You do not own or run it. I take it back, you are as big an idiot as the Anonymous poster. And the invatation is open to you also if you come to Dallas. I have never seen so many punk ass morons in one place in my life.
 
R

Robert Moir

Chris said:
Hi, We had established that the OP had no MSDN subscription

Sorry, I missed that bit. Perhaps you could point me to where that happened?
and was
not a valid tester. You all may continue this as long as you wish,
but this is my closing post.

The software is not yours. Do not come here to post for help or
whatever you want to call it until the software is released to the
public.

-Relevance to Topics:XP SP2 is not relevant, as it has not been
released to the public.
-Confidentiality:All beta testers are always under non-disclosure
agreement's (NDA)

I can't speak for anyone else, but Chris, if *I* want to post here for help
on anything, I will. People don't need your permission to post, any more
than they need mine. But you know, despite being fairly well known for
having a sharp tongue myself, I've managed to answer people and say
substantially what you said but without causing a flame war. Have you ever
considered why that might be?

If you disagree with something then I'd suggest either ignore it, or if you
feel you must speak it is always better to be polite about it. You can catch
more flies with a drop of honey than you can with a bucket of vinegar, you
know.

And I always respect NDAs.

--
 
C

Chris Lanier

Advise well taken.

Side note. This all started with the MSDN discussion. Tom Porterfield
brought up the MSDN topic.

Sorry all for the way I have acted.
 
D

DILIP

Hi Tom

Can you please give us an idea about how big SP2 (network) is. People on
Dial-Up like me have to arrange for it via cable downloaders. Also, does
the beta have all the proposed fixes, and is it essentially just being
"tested"? Or will more fixes be incorporated as time progresses?

Thanks!
 
S

shojo kid

DILIP said:
Hi Tom

Can you please give us an idea about how big SP2 (network) is. People on
Dial-Up like me have to arrange for it via cable downloaders. Also, does
the beta have all the proposed fixes, and is it essentially just being
"tested"? Or will more fixes be incorporated as time progresses?

Thanks!
This is Tom's earlier reply to me. The only thing not answered is the
length of the download
.........

Probably not questions that can be answered. After all, all private beta
testers are under strict NDA. MS has released some information that can
be found at the following links:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnwxp/html/securityinxpsp2.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/winxpsp2.asp

SP2 is currently in early beta, so things are still subject to change as
the beta progresses.
-- Tom Porterfield
 
T

Tom Porterfield

shojo said:
Probably not questions that can be answered. After all, all private
beta testers are under strict NDA. MS has released some information
that can be found at the following links:

http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/dnwxp/html/securityinxpsp2.asp
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/maintain/winxpsp2.asp

SP2 is currently in early beta, so things are still subject to change
as the beta progresses.
-- Tom Porterfield

Thanks shojo, at this time there isn't anything else I can add to the
above.
--
Tom Porterfield
MS-MVP Smart Display
http://support.telop.org

Please post all follow-ups to the newsgroup only.
 
G

Guest

Wow, I randomly stumbled upon this and all I have to say is well.. LOL

Some of you (2 of you) are elitists and project the "OMG you need to have authorisation, Look at me LOOK AT ME!" attitude

Grow up, If someone needs help they need help. Its not your place to question whether or not they should have it and tell them they will only get help if they are "AUTHORISED

Some people I swear...
 
G

Guest

Yes - I agree. That's why there aren't really Microsoft "enthusiasts". Mr. Frisch needs to develop his people skills. I hope he is not in the employ of Microsoft but rather some kind of unpaid lackey... at least that would make me feel a bit better.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Top