Windows XP and 100% CPU being used

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dan
  • Start date Start date
Not to mention the fact that the manufacturer's drivers are often "reference
drivers" that implement only a minimal set of functionality, whereas the
integrator (in this case, mobo manufacturer) may add further features in
silicon that only the correct driver can activate.

--
Richard G. Harper [MVP Shell/User] (e-mail address removed)
* PLEASE post all messages and replies in the newsgroups
* for the benefit of all. Private mail is usually not replied to.
* My website, such as it is ... http://rgharper.mvps.org/
* HELP us help YOU ... http://www.dts-l.org/goodpost.htm
 
Gary said:
Well I don't know as that's the best policy to follow, Dan, updating
individual motherboard components from Intel or wherever instead of
accepting the latest package provided by the mobo manufacturer. I think
perhaps the latter knows best which versions of drivers work best for the
particular board you have, particularly from a synergistic point of view.
They've also actually tested the drivers on the board.

Thanks for your input, Gary and Richard. I appreciate it and I see the
point you are making. I have flashed to the latest BIOS from ASUS and I
have the latest drivers from SIS which are the ones involved with the
chipset of my motherboard.
 
Well, the 98SE side of the internet is temporarily down and so I am posting
via web interface in the XP Pro. side. This side is actually doing much
better with the updated drivers but still comes to the 100% CPU being used
but for a much shorter time.
 
cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user) said:
I'd suspect the following:

1) Underfootware packet-writing drivers

Packet writing is a way of treating xxRW disks as "big floppies", so
that you can simply treat them as such from Windows Explorer or any
other Windows application.

Behind the scenes will be a 3rd-party service that may lurk in the
SysTray; either DirectCD from the Adaptec/Roxio camp, or InCD from the
Nero camp, or sometimes something else. If you have more than one of
these running at the same time, mileage is likely to be adverse++

Packet writing generally sucks, because different tribes can't always
read each others' disks, and because of the "lazy write" problem that
typically leaves you with a disk that has no files and no free space.

Usually, "lazy writes" are used to speed up slow storage devices;
writes are held in memory and written to the device "later".
Bad-exit, crash, or remove the storage device before this happens, and
you end up with a data barf.

But there's another reason to resort to "lazy writes" that applies to
xxRW disks and USB flash drives (but not SD cards) alike; a limited
write-life for the storage technology. In this situation, delayed
writes may be even "lazier", so that multiple write operations can be
combined and thus extend the life of the storage.

2) MRU and other integration links to optical drive

If you've ever "opened" material off CD/DVD, and especially if you've
inadvertently created a file association to an executable there, then
the system is likely to nag the drive all the time.

One sees this a lot with diskettes too; in Win9x, the PIF folder
(under Windows) is another source of this, as .pif settings for
removable disks are stored not on the disks, but in PIF.

3) Pending XP "CD writing" writes

XP has native CD writing, but it's pretty awful - it mixes the worst
of both packet writing (pending writes) and "normal" CD/DVD authoring
(multisession compatibility issues, treats xxRW as xxR disks).

Material that you may think was written to an optical disk, may be
left lying around in a deeply-nested "CD Burning" folder that's
repeated within each user profile. That can be a lot of gunk bloating
up the C: volume. That material will also show up as "ghosts" on
every data disk you insert in the drive; the idea is that it's
material that would be on the disk if you were to write it there
(which it would do as a new session, not via packet-writing).

You can disable XP's native writing via right-click on the drive
letter, Properties, and UNcheck "enable CD recording". I always do
this; formal authoring via Nero may be a pain, but at least I can see
exactly what's on the disk and how it was written there.

4) Autoplay

Like Win9x, XP will look for an \Autorun.inf on a newly-inserted disk,
and interpret it unless this is suppressed at the drive letter or
device (NoDriveTypeAutoRun) level.

Unlike Win9x, XP will also grope the contents of CDs, DVDs and flash
drives when they are discovered, to "autoplay" them however it deeps
appropriate, based on the types of files it finds there.

5) Bad drive or disk

Because XP has so many background file gropers (indexers,
thumbnailers, etc.) you may find the presence of a disk in a duff
drive, or a duff disk, will slow down the whole system.

This may affect some XP systems and not others, depending on what
native services are running, and especially depending on what
3rd-party underfootware - such as av, camera image transfer
(f)utilities, etc. - are added. The latter can stink up Win9x too.


DMA not enabled for drive.
 
:

Thanks for the helpful post. I am unfortunately using the web interface
since 98SE connection to the Internet is down. XP Pro. and Windows Vista
still connect well to the Internet. Just to let everyone know that DMA is
enabled for the drives.
 
Sorry for the top posting Chris and I now have 98SE enabled for the
Internet again and bottom posting resumes.
 
Dan said:
Well, the 98SE side of the internet is temporarily down and so I am posting
via web interface in the XP Pro. side. This side is actually doing much
better with the updated drivers but still comes to the 100% CPU being used
but for a much shorter time.

Follow through: 98SE up and running again and finally able to use
Mozilla Thunderbird again for posting. <sigh -- relief at last from the
web interface>
 
| <snip>
| >>
| >>> ------------------------ ---- --- -- - - - -
| >> A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read
text.
| >> Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
| >> A: Top-posting.
| >> Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?
| >>
|
| Sorry for the top posting Chris and I now have 98SE enabled for the
| Internet again and bottom posting resumes.

Glad to hear that about 98SE. I'm sure I'll see what it was when I get
to that thread, which I was about to enter today. Stick with cquirke
about speeding up XP. It will turn your toes purple all the quicker,
though!
 
Dan said:
Thanks for your input, Gary and Richard. I appreciate it and I see the
point you are making. I have flashed to the latest BIOS from ASUS and I
have the latest drivers from SIS which are the ones involved with the
chipset of my motherboard.

You haven't quite got the point they are making, though: DON'T get the
drivers from SIS, get them from ASUS - that is the Windows drivers for the
mobo, not just the BIOS itself.
 
J. P. Gilliver said:
You haven't quite got the point they are making, though: DON'T get the
drivers from SIS, get them from ASUS - that is the Windows drivers for the
mobo, not just the BIOS itself.

Okay, J.P., I will search for them.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top