Windows Vista Mail

[Guest]

Please help somebody, I'm new at this.....when sending an email through
Windows vista it goes straight into my outbox with what looks like a folder
picture beside it not an envelope...

 

[Femi Odewale]

Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to configure it
with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account details [Tools -
Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to use it to send emails from
your company email account it may be you are using the wrong client.

Regards

Femi

 

[Julian]

Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to configure
it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account details [Tools -
Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to use it to send emails
from your company email account it may be you are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

 

[Alias]

Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to use
it to send emails from your company email account it may be you are
using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is irresponsible,
dear. If you don't understand why, read the release notes for this BETA.

To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works wonderfully.
Get it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

Alias

 

[Ian]

You appear to be asking why it goes into the Outbox before sending. This is
common practice in Outlook Express now called Vista Mail. If you want to
write several emails before sending, going into the Outbox you can send all
in one go. If you want to change this Click the Tools menu and Open Options
and the Send tab, put a tick in Send immediately.

 

[Julian]

Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to use it
to send emails from your company email account it may be you are using
the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is irresponsible,
dear. If you don't understand why, read the release notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.
There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works wonderfully. Get
it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

At least be honest and say something like...
Replace WM with Thunderbird AND a full function newsreader
which is what someone wanting to fully replace WM would have to do.

note. I really like Thunderbird and wouldn't hesitate to use it
if it could do the job.

Alias... source of half truths and full lies.

 

[Alias]

Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to
use it to send emails from your company email account it may be you
are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is irresponsible,
dear. If you don't understand why, read the release notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false, now
does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

What functionality, dear?

At least be honest and say something like...
Replace WM with Thunderbird AND a full function newsreader
which is what someone wanting to fully replace WM would have to do.

Thunderbird has a news reader. I am using it as I type, dear.

note. I really like Thunderbird and wouldn't hesitate to use it
if it could do the job.

What job can't it do, dear?

Alias... source of half truths and full lies.

You have yet to point one single half truth or full lie, dear.

Alias

 

[Julian]

Julian wrote:


Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to use
it to send emails from your company email account it may be you are
using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is irresponsible,
dear. If you don't understand why, read the release notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false, now
does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

What advantage has WM over WLM?

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.


What functionality, dear?

Combine and decode.
Marking read messages in all groups.

Thunderbird has a news reader. I am using it as I type, dear.


What job can't it do, dear?

Combine and decode.
Marking read messages in all groups.

 

[Alias]

Julian wrote:


Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to
use it to send emails from your company email account it may be
you are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this
particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is
irresponsible, dear. If you don't understand why, read the release
notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false, now
does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

What advantage has WM over WLM?

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.


What functionality, dear?

Combine and decode.

XNews is better than all of them for that.

 

[Julian]

Julian wrote:


Julian wrote:


Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to
use it to send emails from your company email account it may be you
are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting
their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate
and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this
particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is irresponsible,
dear. If you don't understand why, read the release notes for this
BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false, now
does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

What advantage has WM over WLM?

Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.



To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works wonderfully.
Get it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

What functionality, dear?

Combine and decode.

XNews is better than all of them for that.

So why not recommend Xnews as a WM replacement?

 

[Alias]

Julian wrote:


Julian wrote:


Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like
account details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are
trying to use it to send emails from your company email account
it may be you are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting
their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to
debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this
particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is
irresponsible, dear. If you don't understand why, read the release
notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false,
now does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

What advantage has WM over WLM?



Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.



To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works
wonderfully. Get it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

What functionality, dear?

Combine and decode.

XNews is better than all of them for that.

So why not recommend Xnews as a WM replacement?

Because the OP was talking about *email*, dear.

Alias

 

[Julian]

Julian wrote:


Julian wrote:


Julian wrote:


Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to
use it to send emails from your company email account it may be
you are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting
their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate
and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this
particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is
irresponsible, dear. If you don't understand why, read the release
notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false, now
does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

What advantage has WM over WLM?



Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.



To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works
wonderfully. Get it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

What functionality, dear?

Combine and decode.

XNews is better than all of them for that.

So why not recommend Xnews as a WM replacement?

Because the OP was talking about *email*, dear.

The topic is Windows Vista Mail.
That doesn't mean the OP wants to dispense with
full newsreader functionality
or have to use two tools instead.

ie. Your usual solution to any problem...

 

[Alias]

Julian wrote:


Julian wrote:


Julian wrote:


Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need
to configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like
account details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you
are trying to use it to send emails from your company email
account it may be you are using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are
putting their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to
debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this
particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is
irresponsible, dear. If you don't understand why, read the
release notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.

You're right but that doesn't make my statement about BETAs false,
now does it, dear?

There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Yes, there is.

What advantage has WM over WLM?



Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

Read the release notes if you want it from the horse's mouth, dear.



To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works
wonderfully. Get it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

What functionality, dear?

Combine and decode.

XNews is better than all of them for that.

So why not recommend Xnews as a WM replacement?

Because the OP was talking about *email*, dear.

The topic is Windows Vista Mail.
That doesn't mean the OP wants to dispense with
full newsreader functionality
or have to use two tools instead.

ie. Your usual solution to any problem...

Unlike you, who recommends a BETA program, I offered the OP a solution
to his email problems. If he isn't into binaries or marking all the
groups read, my solution will also provide him with an excellent news
reader as well, dear.

Alias

 

[Steve Cochran]

Please don't use me as a source or reference for your arguments. I disagree
with you and would not recommend WalMail to anyone, beta or not.

steve

Windows Vista mail is the new Outlook Express. You will need to
configure it with your hotmail, yahoo, google or such like account
details [Tools - Accounts - Add...]. If however you are trying to use
it to send emails from your company email account it may be you are
using the wrong client.

Don't bother with Windows Mail, it is virtually redundant and not
receiving much attention (if any) from M$ since they are putting their
resources into its replacement
http://get.live.com/betas/maildesktop_betas

It has it's own newsgroup
microsoft.public.windows.vista.live.mail.desktop
which, unusually, has active M$ personel who are willing to debate and
consider all suggestions with respect to future development.

I find the product quite good and the attitude of M$ in this particular
case to be just what one would wish of a software supplier.

BTW it is easy to install and adopts all the WM settings.

Advising someone to use a BETA version of a product is irresponsible,
dear. If you don't understand why, read the release notes for this BETA.

You have no experience with WM or WLM.
There is nothing irresponsible about encouraging people off WM
no matter how dodgy the alternative..

Talk to those with lots of experience ie. Gary, Frank and Steve
at the Windows Mail group.

To the OP: use Thunderbird as it is not in BETA and works wonderfully.
Get it at http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbird

There you go again... encouraging people to go for an option
that simply cannot reproduce the functionality.

At least be honest and say something like...
Replace WM with Thunderbird AND a full function newsreader
which is what someone wanting to fully replace WM would have to do.

note. I really like Thunderbird and wouldn't hesitate to use it
if it could do the job.

Alias... source of half truths and full lies.

 

[Julian]

Please don't use me as a source or reference for your arguments. I
disagree with you and would not recommend WalMail to anyone, beta or not.

I meant that you had a lot of experience with respect to
WM problems but see how it could be misunderstood.