Windows Live Mail, OE, Outlook, Are they the brothers or twins?

  • Thread starter Thread starter smith
  • Start date Start date
S

smith

I found that they are too similar to each other, but if they are that way,
why Microsoft would like to develop an identical one?
 
smith said:
I found that they are too similar to each other, but if they are that way,
why Microsoft would like to develop an identical one?
Its call Remix,Old in a New Box
 
Database change as explained as explained in response to post in Outlook
Express newsgroup.

The most fundamental change is the database used for storing messages.
Dbx files in Outlook Express grow to unwieldy sizes placing strains on
systems with limited CPU and memory capacity. Files need to be compacted
regularly and this process has always been problematic.


--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
And Outllook is an entirely different application, only related by the fact
that its an email app
 
I found that they are too similar to each other, but if they are that way,
why Microsoft would like to develop an identical one?


Windows Mail is essentially just the newest version of Outlook
Express. They both come as part of the operating system. Windows Mail
is the version that ships with Vista.

Outlook is another thing entirely. It is not free/part of the
operating system, but is for sale, either separately or as part of
Microsoft Office.

They also have very different feature sets. Outlook Express/Windows
Mail is an E-mail Client and newsreader. Outlook is a full-featured
Personal Information Manager, and also does E-mail. They overlap in
only a single area: E-mail.
 
Ken

A significantly different database file system? Less freedom of action /
choice for the user ?? The second point is a feeling not necessarily a
fact.

--
Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Ken

A significantly different database file system?


Yes, they have different database systems. But that's not surprising,
and generally doesn't matter to most people. It's differences in
features and look and feel that most people care about, rather than
what happens under the hood.
 
Note that the OP is referencing Windows Live Mail, not Windows Mail. WLM
runs on both WinXP and Vista. I, like apparently many others, migrated
happily (and easily) to it from OE or WM even when it was still in Beta
status. WLM recently went to formal product status. WLM appears to have
interested and active Microsoft support, and no kind of Microsoft account is
required to use it.

For more WLM info and a download, start at
http://get.live.com/wlmail/overview . Note that you don't have to
select/use any other Windows Live products other than Mail.

The MS newsgroup for WLM is microsoft.public.windows.live.mail.desktop .

--- Frank
 
My earlier post is not correct as I thought you were asking about
differences between Outlook Express and Windows Mail.

--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Frank

You make a good point. Like Ken I took the OP to be referring to Windows
Mail.

--
Regards.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
A significantly different database file system? Less freedom of action /
choice for the user ??

How is the difference in internal format affecting the end user's choices?
Unless you're a developer trying to hack together something to extract data
directly from those files, you should only be concerned about the frontend.
 
Homer

There are separate points. I was actually comparing Outlook Express and
Windows Mail.

--



Hope this helps.

Gerry
~~~~
FCA
Stourport, England
Enquire, plan and execute
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top