"Alias" <
[email protected] wrote
I did say "If ... an OEM version ... not pre-installed ... *AND* instead
had to be purchased with ... hardware ...". I used AND for a reason
(because I have heard of the policy change). However, there are still
many copies of OEM versions out there which still have EULAs written
that demand the "SOFTWARE" be purchased with hardware. I don't see any
statement from Microsoft that dictates a policy change in writing the
new EULAs that also gets applied to all old EULAs. Imagine the
confusion and lack of documentation in knowing just exactly what your
license permitted and didn't permit based on non-present and
disconnected documentation that was not easily identified or verifiable.
It is highly unlikely that the new policy and EULA is retroactive. You
get whatever is the EULA in the copy that you actually buy. We have
several OEM version copies that do require they were purchased with
hardware and have to track those together (just like we have to track
separately the pre-installed OEM copies and the retail copies). If you
know of an official statement from Microsoft that retroactively modifies
all existing OEM EULAs (which is probably only for the non-preinstalled
OEMs) so they no longer require hardware despite what the EULA says that
is included with the product, I'd sure like to see it. Then we wouldn't
have to track the OEM and hardware together. Would make it a lot easier
to manage licenses.