Wake Up, MicroSychophants!

[Travis King]

That is, in my favorites.

-----Original Message-----


Why not, Travis? Haven't learned how to use Google's language tools yet?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


.

 

[kurttrail]

Actually, I have a web page for language translations.

That is, in my favorites.

Why does everyone only answer the questions I mean as a joke, instead of the
ones I meant to be answered?

Why don't you want me to "deutsch sprechen?" Was ist los mit ihm?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Brian Coats]

Kurt,
There is newsgroup that is debating sco lawsuit. You would get much
better response their. However, I think IBM should keep fighting. I
believe the sco is wrong. Under Current laws, Sco can’t go back and
make people pay for previously uses. Think like going into walmart
and buying a candy bar. A few years later a middle man comes
Is and ask pay for the candy bar your already ate. There is a law
each of them are not aware of. One is Statue of Limitations to file a
lawsuit. IBM should of know this. This is just my opinion. Put at
another way-I will not pay for any license to use Linux period. That
brings up another point. Wal-mart caries lindows through Microtel
I don’t see Sco going after Wal-mart. Wal-mart with go all the
way-the did with the credit card companies, No you can’t use you
mastercard debit card like a credit card at wal-marts

Since this is possible a pro Sco group. This is my only statement. I
will make on this mater. Back to helping no more repsons in this
thread.

I don’t mean any disrespect or any offense to companies mentioned here
at all

Brian

Here he goes again!

Pray tell, where am I going exactly?

I got to give Mike Solomon a lot of credit for at least taking the high road
in wiggling out of answering a rather simple question directly, but you
other guys are nothing but a bunch of baffoons, and aren't in the least bit
imaginative with your cowardly attempts side-step the question.

What a bunch of pussies MS has for advocates! [No offense meant towards
pussy cats.] ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

Stop shouting.

NO! Since the question has been ignore in one form or another so often, I
figured it was because all ya'll MicroBots are deaf or something.

There is nothing wrong with shouting a line or two, Jim. Bad netiquette is
when you always post with the Cap Locks always on. So don't go trying to
Net-Martha me, I know what the hell I'm doing.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Brian Coats]

corrected post

Kurt,

There is newsgroup that is debating sco lawsuit. You would get much
better response their. However, I think IBM should keep fighting. I
believe the sco is wrong. Under Current laws, Sco can’t go back and
make people pay for previously uses. Think like going into walmart
and buying a candy bar. A few years later a middle man comes
Is and ask pay for the candy bar your already ate. There is a law
each of them are not aware of. One is Statue of Limitations to file a
lawsuit. IBM should of know this. This is just my opinion. Put at
another way-I will not pay for any license to use Linux period. That
brings up another point. Wal-mart caries lindows through Microtel
I don’t see Sco going after Wal-mart. Wal-mart will go all the
way-like they did with the credit card companies, Now you can’t use
you mastercard debit card like a credit card at wal-marts

Since this is possible a pro Sco group. This is my only statement. I
will make on this mater. Back to helping no more repsons in this
thread.

I don’t mean any disrespect or any offense to companies mentioned here
at all

Brian

Here he goes again!

Pray tell, where am I going exactly?

I got to give Mike Solomon a lot of credit for at least taking the high road
in wiggling out of answering a rather simple question directly, but you
other guys are nothing but a bunch of baffoons, and aren't in the least bit
imaginative with your cowardly attempts side-step the question.

What a bunch of pussies MS has for advocates! [No offense meant towards
pussy cats.] ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

kurttrail;
"Bad netiquette" is also bringing up a subject not appropriate to a
particular newsgroup.
Perhaps if you would take your question to an appropriate forum, you
may get a good answer.
Maybe your argument has no validity there either.
Of course maybe I missed something and the SCO issue is specifically a
Windows XP issue.

 

[kurttrail]

Kurt,
There is newsgroup that is debating sco lawsuit.

This thread doesn't really have anything to do with who is right and wrong
in SCO v. IBM.

"Since ya'll believe that MS's Windows XP "shrink-wrap license" One Computer
claims should be followed despite never being legally substantiated as being
legally enforcable over an individuals right to "fair use:

"'DO YOU BELIEVE THAT IBM SHOULD JUST CAVE IN TO SCO'S LICENSING CLAIMS
BEFORE SCO LEGALLY SUBSTANTIATES THOSE CLAIMS?'"

You see, this has more to do with licensing claims, in general, whether one
should respect the licensing claims of the licensor before or after they
legally substantiate them.

You would get much
better response their.

I doubt it, since my intentions aren't to show that SCO's claims are wrong,
but whether one should believe ANY licensing claims as fact until they have
proven so by the preponderance of the evidence in a real court of law.

However, I think IBM should keep fighting. I
believe the sco is wrong. Under Current laws, Sco can’t go back and
make people pay for previously uses. Think like going into walmart
and buying a candy bar. A few years later a middle man comes
Is and ask pay for the candy bar your already ate. There is a law
each of them are not aware of. One is Statue of Limitations to file a
lawsuit. IBM should of know this. This is just my opinion. Put at
another way-I will not pay for any license to use Linux period. That
brings up another point. Wal-mart caries lindows through Microtel
I don’t see Sco going after Wal-mart. Wal-mart with go all the
way-the did with the credit card companies, No you can’t use you
mastercard debit card like a credit card at wal-marts

Since this is possible a pro Sco group. This is my only statement. I
will make on this mater. Back to helping no more repsons in this
thread.

I don’t mean any disrespect or any offense to companies mentioned here
at all

No offense was taken, as companies are non-sentient business entities, and
can't feel offended or dissed.

As for the so-called humans here that are emotionally affected by your
opinions about certain companies, F*CK 'EM! ;-)

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[kurttrail]

kurttrail;
"Bad netiquette" is also bringing up a subject not appropriate to a
particular newsgroup.

It's about the licensing claims of the licensor in general. My OP even
specifically mentioned Windows XP EULA, in connection to the SCO/IBM
situation. I'm trying to get a straight answer for a question you yourself
have previously refused to answer.

I'm trying to draw the connection between the two to demonstrate to the
mostly rational casual observer that a legally unsubstatiated licensing
claim is just that, and it is neither morally nor legally a fact until it
has been legally substantiated in a law, or by the preponderance of the
evidence in a court of law, not just because the licensor and it's advocates
repeat it over & over again, like a mantra.

"We are the MicroBorg! You will use XP on One Computer! Resistence is
Futile! You will be assimilated!"

Perhaps if you would take your question to an appropriate forum, you
may get a good answer.

I think ya'll have answered it, by avoiding to answer it directly, it like
the plague. I never saw so many people avoid answering a question directly
that weren't politicians!

Maybe your argument has no validity there either.

I believe it was a question, not an argument. Somebody is gonna have to
answer it directly first, before any real argument, or for that matter,
before a rational discussion occurs.

Of course maybe I missed something and the SCO issue is specifically a
Windows XP issue.

I believe I made the connection in my OP.

"Since ya'll believe that MS's *Windows* *XP* "shrink-wrap license" One
Computer claims should be followed despite never being legally substantiated
as being legally enforcable over an individuals right to 'fair use':"

"'DO YOU BELIEVE THAT IBM SHOULD JUST CAVE IN TO SCO'S LICENSING CLAIMS
BEFORE SCO LEGALLY SUBSTANTIATES THOSE CLAIMS?'"

It's about, when does a licensing claim become legal fact, before or after
it has been legally substantiated by the licensor?

Rather simple question, I would have thought. F*ck me silly, but I guess
I'm guilty of over-estimating that intelligence of the average MicroZealot!


Juppy Maus MS-MVP Signiture Censor strikes again! I just love that he goes
out of his way to change my sig time and again. I use OE quote-fix to cut
off peoples' sigs automatically. I guess he get some kind of thrill
fingering the same key over & over again over my sig. I bet his a**hole is
happy for attention my sig draws away from it. PMSL!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[Mike]

-----Original Message-----


Are you depressed, Travis? Try getting laid, and give you hand a rest.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"


.
There is not a single one of you who can make a

difference in this matter. Flush your self inflated
intellect and stick to a problem where you might be of
value.

 

[Bruce Chambers, Microsum Most Valuable Hypocrite]

There is not a single one of you who can make a
difference in this matter.

Especially if one has your attitude.

Flush your self inflated
intellect and stick to a problem where you might be of
value.

Like?

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"

 

[wojo]

Haven't you grown tired of this yet Bruce?
I decided it wasn't worth the effort anymore.

--
If I can help you I will.
If you can help me thanks.
(e-mail address removed)
TO Email: Remove "SPAM" without the quotes

Useful Links
AdAware:
www.lavasoftusa.com/software/adaware/
Spybot S & D:
www.safer-networking.org/
Check for Parasites/Worms:
www.gemal.dk/browserspy/parasites.html
Blaster Security Patch:
http://www.microsoft.com/security/incident/blast.asp
TweakUI and other PowerToys:
www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/pro/downloads/powertoys.asp

 

[kurttrail]

Hey MicroCensor!

Censor this post with the link to thread you pulled from MS's server too,
while your playing your MicroFascist games!

http://groups.google.com/[email protected]

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei!"