Super small windows coming after the Vista mega monster?

  • Thread starter non flammable on XP
  • Start date
F

Frank

non flammable on XP wrote:


....some bullsh*t about a blog he forgot to even read.
You know nothing at all about Win7 so stop the pretense!
Idiot!
Frank
 
T

the wharf rat

I remember people saving the same about Windows 95.
Decent hardware to run Win 95 was scarce and expensive.

I don't remember that at all. I did literally hundreds
of 3.11->95 upgrades and they were almost universally flawless, and
a big improvement as well. 95 will run on a 486/33 and 8 MB of ram,
weak even by 95 standards when most folks were at the Pentium level.

Contrast with Vista: core hardware upgrades are required for
most installs.
Now after 3.11 on 6 FDD's that was bloat.

Lol. SunOS came on ummm 43? 45? floppies... The 13 or 14
you needed for 95 (or was it 16? whatever) seemed tiny :) Anyway,
everyone had a cd so they could play Quake.
 
A

Apply_Directly_To_Forehead

Hey numbnuts, you are the stupid one. Don't like Vista, go use Ubuntu

Just FYI
 
N

non flammable on XP

oh what have we here? a loud mouth knowitall know nothing!

Get lost twerp!
 
N

non flammable on XP

I am not against operating systems getting bigger..

I want them to get bigger but better...

not bigger and worse!

LOL vista has gotten 10 times bigger and actually nothing of real value has
been added..
rather a trillion things that are CRAP have been either changed or added and
good things removed..

vista is a disaster of design
 
F

Frank

non flammable on XP wrote:

....just more of bird brained bullsh*t about something (Vista) of which
he knows nothing.
Get lost you idiot!
Frank
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top