Rules about copies of XP?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Laurel
  • Start date Start date
Don't make me sick either.
Your "founding fathers" didn't trust you to choose a president.

That's because they know that most peoples in every country are like
sheep. I agree with the system, it's not failed us yet.

Unless you can provide examples of working and better systems you should
stop spouting drivel.
 
Leythos said:
That's because they know that most peoples in every country are like
sheep. I agree with the system, it's not failed us yet.

Unless you can provide examples of working and better systems you
should stop spouting drivel.

LOL! It failed us in 2000.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
Leythos said:
I was thinking the same about you.

So, now you're getting delusional from your Psychosomatic sickness too.

I haven't complained at all about being made sick.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
And like many others that make these kind of comments, you are just one in
another of the never ending stream of MS drones that pop in and out of the
newgroups. You come in, make a simplistic unhelpful comment, then disappear
when someone replies to you. I wonder why you would killfile, since this is
no more than a shitty cameo appearance by you!
 
I live in Australia. We wrote our constitution a little after YOUR civil war. We won't be having mass slaughter in Australia. Also everyone votes and no votes are wasted. EG. In your terms if I voted Nader I could preference Bush second. If Nader doesn't get enough votes to be first or second in the count my Nader vote goes to Bush (though most presdential systems (but yours) have multi round voting to cope with this). To change our constitution requires 50% of the voters (everyone over 18) +1 AND 50% +1 in a majority of states. And lastly we vote for teams not one individual (I find that really bizarre).

So there are some better ways.
 
David said:
I live in Australia. We wrote our constitution a little after YOUR
civil war. We won't be having mass slaughter in Australia. Also
everyone votes and no votes are wasted. EG. In your terms if I voted
Nader I could preference Bush second. If Nader doesn't get enough
votes to be first or second in the count my Nader vote goes to Bush
(though most presdential systems (but yours) have multi round voting
to cope with this). To change our constitution requires 50% of the
voters (everyone over 18) +1 AND 50% +1 in a majority of states. And
lastly we vote for teams not one individual (I find that really
bizarre).

So there are some better ways.

Are you trying to convert me? :)

I'm sure there are things that don't work in your system, just like in
the US. No system of gov't is perfect. The goal should always be "in
order to form a more perfect union." But ends up being, getting the
gov't that is deserved. The US deserved to have the travesty of the
Bush presidency, to re-learn that our gov't isn't working towards the
goal of creating a "more perfect union" anymore.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
I live in Australia. We wrote our constitution a little after YOUR civil
war. We won't be having mass slaughter in Australia. Also everyone votes
and no votes are wasted. EG. In your terms if I voted Nader I could
preference Bush second. If Nader doesn't get enough votes to be first or
second in the count my Nader vote goes to Bush (though most presdential
systems (but yours) have multi round voting to cope with this). To
change our constitution requires 50% of the voters (everyone over 18) +1
AND 50% +1 in a majority of states. And lastly we vote for teams not one
individual (I find that really bizarre).

So there are some better ways.

Nice, I didn't know that about Oz, it appears to be a very nice method.
Not sure about the Mass Slaughter comment - unless you're talking about
restricting ownership of Weapons to government agents and not the public.
 
Leythos said:
And you sound like Kurt

I would have combined it into one word, and I wouldn't compare you to
Jesus. He was a cool dude.

MicroFalwell, would be more fitting, in my eyes, since you both preach a
false doctrine, trying to lead the righteous astray.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
MicroFalwell, would be more fitting, in my eyes, since you both preach a
false doctrine, trying to lead the righteous astray.

The problem is that your's is ALSO a false doctrine an it's not been
proven to be valid, you're only hoping that it is valid - much like Hitler
thought he was doing the right thing for the people he was advocating for.
 
Falwell, like you, preaches conformity, and Jesus like, me, taught that
the leaders of his time were corrupt and full of greed.

But Jesus also asked people to follow blindly and to conform and created a
couple leaders also - seems no different to me. Falwell uses those
doctrines to rip-people off (IMHO) as do you.
 
kurttrail said:
I would have combined it into one word, and I wouldn't compare you to
Jesus. He was a cool dude.

MicroFalwell, would be more fitting, in my eyes, since you both
preach a false doctrine, trying to lead the righteous astray.

Falwell, like you, preaches conformity, and Jesus like, me, taught that
the leaders of his time were corrupt and full of greed.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
Leythos said:
The problem is that your's is ALSO a false doctrine an it's not been
proven to be valid,

My interpretation is a "fair use" is totally valid until a copyright
owner legally disputes it, and WINS. So it is valid until that happens.
And I won't be holding my breath, since MS has had more than a dozen
years to legally contest the "fair use" of its copyrighted material by
private non-commercial individuals. Valid until legally proven
otherwise.

And the funny thing is, is you can't prove it isn't valid! You can only
state it, as if it were the truth.
you're only hoping that it is valid - much like
Hitler thought he was doing the right thing for the people he was
advocating for.

ROFL! Hilter wasn't for the rights of the individual. My, aren't you
silly goose, Lamethos!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
Leythos said:
But Jesus also asked people to follow blindly and to conform and
created a couple leaders also - seems no different to me.

No, Jesus said "follow me and I make you fishers of men."
Falwell
uses those doctrines to rip-people off (IMHO) as do you.

ROFL! I don't rip people off! I am try to help them not get ripped off
by a proven corporate criminal, Microsoft! Predatory Monopolist, and
both Patent & Copyright infringer! MS is the PROVEN intellectual
property thief! And not one of their private non-commercial paying
customers has EVER been charge with infringement for installing the same
copy of software on more than one computer, let alone been proven guilty
of infringement!

MS is the PROVEN THIEF, not its private non-commercial individual
customers!

PMSL! You are the one that is on the side of the thief!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
And the funny thing is, is you can't prove it isn't valid! You can only
state it, as if it were the truth.

Funny thing is that since it's only your OPINION, it's worth about as much
as the type on this screen. Since your OPINION doesn't do anything for
anyone, it doesn't really matter. I can state what MS licensing terms and
conditions are, you can only state an Opinion, that many disagree with.

Almost makes you look like the Reverend Jim Baker.
 
I don't rip people off! I am try to help them not get ripped off

But the actions you advocate may one day be proven as Illegal, and anyone
not following your BS will not have to worry about it. Those following
your BS will have to pay for the licenses they didn't own or risk legal
action - if this went to court.

Active defiance of an agreement and it's intent does not make it righteous
or proper or legal - you're much like the PETA people.
 
Leythos said:
And you sound like Kurt

How do you know what kurt sounds like? I hear myself talk, and never thought
of myself sounding like another I have never heard speak before. See what
following false doctrines and religions can do to the mind!
 
Leythos said:
Funny thing is that since it's only your OPINION, it's worth about as
much as the type on this screen. Since your OPINION doesn't do
anything for anyone, it doesn't really matter. I can state what MS
licensing terms and conditions are, you can only state an Opinion,
that many disagree with.

What I state about how "Fair Use" works in not my opinion, it is a fact.
My interpretation of "fair use" is valid unless the copyright owner
disagrees with me and wins in a court of law. That is a FACT.

I've given you the link to Stanford U's quote plenty of times. I believe
I even gave to you earlier in this thread, but you snipped it from your
reply like it didn't exist.
Almost makes you look like the Reverend Jim Baker.

My grandparents were one of the suckers he ripped off. He is just
another proven thief, just like MS!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"
 
kurttrail said:
I would have combined it into one word, and I wouldn't compare you to
Jesus. He was a cool dude.

Well, I don't know if he was cool, unless you believe (all good) in what was
written about him. To me, he was no more than a revolutionary changing up
the belief systems of Judaism back then, which then resulted in an offshoot
of Judaism (which was greatly influenced by Zoroastrianism). If all the
words attributed to him are true, of which some of those words are cruel, I
wouldn't say he was all that cool.
 
Back
Top