D
David Candy
How about a new thread. Some of us don't have 5 foot monitors to see the threading.
--
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.microscum.com/mscommunity/
--
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.microscum.com/mscommunity/
Leythos said:On Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:05:23 -0500, kurttrail wrote:
[snip - button]It does show your conflict of interest, since you're a MS partner.
That's the second lamest thing I've seen from you Kurt. We're a partner in
order to qualify for the services and licenses that allow us to operate
the business at a lower cost. There is no conflict in that, actually using
MS's systems to lower or operational costs - a conflict?
Lets take a look: I don't install ISA, we use WatchGuard, I would never
trust ISA. We do spec XP workstations and 2003 servers and SQL database
servers and Exchange 2003 servers, but we also setup Linux workstations
for shops, install non-MS email servers, install non-MS web servers,
install MySQL databases, and design web applications that are supported by
both ASP/ASP.Net and Mono in addition to Java and ColdFusionMX. Seems to
me we're about 50/50 on the solutions and save a ton of money on licensing
by being a partner and ISV - doesn't look like a conflict to me, it looks
like taking advantage of the programs that MS puts in place to help
businesses that build solutions WITH MS products.