RSS reader comparison

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

<http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1228952,00.asp>

A relatively brief comparison of several RSS readers. Compares both
freeware and commercial software.

 

[Claude Metz]

<http://www.extremetech.com/article2/0,3973,1228952,00.asp>

A relatively brief comparison of several RSS readers. Compares both
freeware and commercial software.

It mystifies me that so many reviewers miss Amphetadesk, which is an
excellent freeware program, and the only one recommended by
http://www.pricelessware.org/

 

[Iain Cheyne]

It mystifies me that so many reviewers miss Amphetadesk, which is an
excellent freeware program, and the only one recommended by
http://www.pricelessware.org/

It was the only one nominated (I nominated it) and it only got two votes!

http://snurl.com/amphetavote

It was one of the first. The vote was almost a year ago before the
explosion of rss and news aggregators. It's still good because it's cross-
platform and customisable, but it's only single pane and slow. There has
not been an update for many months.

I prefer Sharpreader (www.sharpreader.com) as it uses a three pane
interface. If the .NET prerequesite bothers you, go for Feedreader.