Registry cleaners

A

Alias

Bruce said:
And Alias also claims that Ubuntu is a superior OS. He has no
credibility.

Actually, Ubuntu is superior for most things. It is not superior for
playing video games or being infected by malware. Windows is much better
for both. Fact is, what I posted is true, your insults and lies
notwithstanding.

Alias
 
T

Terry R.

The date and time was Friday, July 17, 2009 8:04:21 AM , and on a whim,
Bruce Chambers pounded out on the keyboard:
And what would be his purpose in interjecting such an off-topic,
irrelevant piece of trivia, if not a lame attempt to support the
position that registry cleaners were also applicable to WinXP?

Not RegClean for XP though. That's all he talked about was in reference
to Win98. Could be an interpretation issue.


Terry R.
 
U

Unknown

You sure enjoy posting BS don't you?
Alias said:
Actually, Ubuntu is superior for most things. It is not superior for
playing video games or being infected by malware. Windows is much better
for both. Fact is, what I posted is true, your insults and lies
notwithstanding.

Alias
 
B

Bill Sanderson, MSFT, MVP

In your case the short answer is NO you don't need a registry cleaner.
To people who are paranoid about their registry entries, I always
suggest that the surest way and the most effective yet most secure
method is to do a clean install of the operating system every 18 months
or so. Doing a clean install ensures you clear not only any so called
rogue entries in your registry but also all the temporary files that
keep piling up in Windows OS. Microsoft, with all the brain power at
its disposal, thought that temporary files are the best thing for users'
enjoyment of computing experience! These files are NOT deleted
automatically and the members of the pig society frequently suggests to
defrag the HD and use the MS's Disk Cleanup utility. This never method
works (except it helps you to pass your idle time) and I strongly
believe that the only thing that needs defrag or cleaning up is their
own brain.

Hope this helps.
 
B

Bill Sanderson, MSFT, MVP

John said:
Then the registry cleaner vendors will tell us that XML files slow
down the computer and the argument will be about XML cleaners...

John


The product that is actually a hindrance to the speed of the current
powerful intel and AMD processors is Microsoft's Windows OS. The speed
of the processors and other hardware has increased exponentially but
this is hindered by the Windows OS. The DOS was at least faster and
efficient despite running on low spec systems!

Perhaps Chrome will rectify this anomaly! The members of the pig
society (of which you are one) are required to stand by MS products even
if it is crap.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top