In my opinion, unless you are going to use your computer
for very demanding tasks, the extra money for an Athlon is
not at all worth it. Both processors are available with
512 KB Cache, and both have the same length warranty. The
Athlon costs over twice as much for the same speed
processor.
In my opinion, unless you are going to use your computer
for very demanding tasks, the extra money for an Athlon is
not at all worth it. Both processors are available with
512 KB Cache, and both have the same length warranty. The
Athlon costs over twice as much for the same speed
processor.
Since you quoted nothing, I can't tell what you're comparing the
Athlon to. But assuming that it's the Pentium, you have this
backwards; an Athlon is significantly *less* expensive than a
Pentium of similar speed.
In my opinion, unless you are going to use your computer
for very demanding tasks, the extra money for an Athlon is
not at all worth it. Both processors are available with
512 KB Cache, and both have the same length warranty. The
Athlon costs over twice as much for the same speed
processor.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.
