Selecting between 2 Processors

B

bm

I am about to purchase a replacement PC and I have been interested in the
Samsung All in One AO5 and the AO6 models
Their specifications are identical apart from the Processor
The AO5 has Dual-core Intel Core tm 13-3220T Processor (2.8 GHz, 3Mb
cache)
The AO6 has Dual-core Intel r Pentium tm G645T Processor (2.8 GHz, 3Mb
cache)
The AO5 cost £799
The AO6 cost £699
What I would like to know what affect will the different Processors have ?
and would it be worth spending the extra £100 ?
Blair
 
J

JJ

bm said:
I am about to purchase a replacement PC and I have been interested in
the Samsung All in One AO5 and the AO6 models
Their specifications are identical apart from the Processor
The AO5 has Dual-core Intel Core tm 13-3220T Processor (2.8 GHz,
3Mb cache)
The AO6 has Dual-core Intel r Pentium tm G645T Processor (2.8 GHz,
3Mb cache)
The AO5 cost £799
The AO6 cost £699
What I would like to know what affect will the different Processors
have ? and would it be worth spending the extra £100 ?
Blair

G645T doesn't have these that 3220T have:

* Has additional multimedia/scientific/financial instructions (AVX). More
speed but only if the softwares support them. Usually, the softwares are
multimedia players and high-end image editors.

* Has virtual cores (Hyper-Thread). 2 virtual cores for each 1 physical
core. Adds about max 30% more computing speed in overall (which can be
0%). Doesn't need special softwares to utilize it.

Except for 33% faster memory speed due to chipset supporting 3220T,
there's little difference between the two since there aren't many
software that utilize AVX, and some user reviews told that Hyper-Thread
doesn't boost computing speed that much. There's no softwares that
specifically requires AVX nor Hyper-Thread eiter.

If I'm in your shoe and if I can afford it, I'd choose 3220T main because
it's supporting chipset has faster memory, which is pretty noticeable
gain. This affect overall system performance including disk transfer.
 
B

bm

JJ said:
G645T doesn't have these that 3220T have:

* Has additional multimedia/scientific/financial instructions (AVX). More
speed but only if the softwares support them. Usually, the softwares are
multimedia players and high-end image editors.

* Has virtual cores (Hyper-Thread). 2 virtual cores for each 1 physical
core. Adds about max 30% more computing speed in overall (which can be
0%). Doesn't need special softwares to utilize it.

Except for 33% faster memory speed due to chipset supporting 3220T,
there's little difference between the two since there aren't many
software that utilize AVX, and some user reviews told that Hyper-Thread
doesn't boost computing speed that much. There's no softwares that
specifically requires AVX nor Hyper-Thread eiter.

If I'm in your shoe and if I can afford it, I'd choose 3220T main because
it's supporting chipset has faster memory, which is pretty noticeable
gain. This affect overall system performance including disk transfer.

Many thanks for you help Faster memory is worth while and would help my
present position
Also I live in the country with a poor down load speed which is between 1
and 2 M with no sign that this will be improved
but I don't expect the faster memory will affect this figure
Blair
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top