Leythos said:Wrong, we've caught/killed MANY terrorists that were involved in 9/11,
but you think to small - you've only caught the immediate ones involved
in the 3/11 attacks in Spain. Stop thinking so small.
The rest of your post was bs or unproven, so there is nothing to reply
too [sic].
aka@ said:Name one. You can't. Or are you referring to the hundreds of thousands
of innocent civilians Bush and Co. have murdered in Iraq?
Um, Spain has caught countless more terrorists than the USA but Spain
doesn't have the barbaric death penalty so we haven't killed them.
The rest of your post was bs or unproven, so there is nothing to reply
too [sic].
Translation: you know you're wrong and are trying to sluff it off with
an ad hominem.
Leythos said:Start here - whey they don't say what teams captured them or what
multinational teams, you might be able to read between the lines:
http://memritv.org/Search.asp?ACT=S5&P1=65&P3=1
and more that indicates we've captured Terrorists:
http://www.nationalterroralert.com/updates/index.php?p=45
http://www.nicedoggie.net/2006/?p=428
http://www.rewardsforjustice.net/english/wanted_captured/index.cfm?
page=Captured
http://www.slobodan-milosevic.org/news/srna121404.htm
Just google for "captured terrorists" if you need more info.
Killing people that kill innocents is not "barbaric", it's justice.
Translation: you know you're wrong and are trying to sluff it off withThe rest of your post was bs or unproven, so there is nothing to reply
too [sic].
an ad hominem.
Take it how you want, but you didn't offer any reputable information on
your claims, so I didn't see the need to be drug off in to crap.
aka@ said:I said 9/11, not all the people the USA has locked up without legal
recourse who will, eventually, be put through a military monkey trial.
So far, ONE person has been locked up and tried who was involved with 9/11.
No, it's barbaric. Killing is wrong no matter what.
The rest of your post was bs or unproven, so there is nothing to reply
too [sic].
Translation: you know you're wrong and are trying to sluff it off with
an ad hominem.
Take it how you want, but you didn't offer any reputable information on
your claims, so I didn't see the need to be drug off in to crap.
Translation: Leythos further uses ad hominems because he can't address
the issues posed. Very amateurish, Leythos.
As far as "reputable information", are you now denying that the price of
oil has skyrocketed?
Are you denying that Bush saved Hugo Chavez'
presidency by going to an illegal war in Iraq and thus pushing the price
of oil up?
Yes.
Are you denying that Bush has phones and emails tapped
without a warrant?
Are you denying that Bush has people locked up
without legal recourse? What *are* you denying that I posted?
Leythos said:So, what do you do with a person that has killed many others for simply
being of a particular color, race, religion, that would do it again if
you let them? Oh, yea, lock them up so that they can convert others to
their way of thinking, so that they can get released in 10 years, so
that they can kill others in the Prison..... Come on, what's your
solution?
Translation: Leythos further uses ad hominems because he can't addressThe rest of your post was bs or unproven, so there is nothing to reply
too [sic].
Translation: you know you're wrong and are trying to sluff it off with
an ad hominem.
Take it how you want, but you didn't offer any reputable information on
your claims, so I didn't see the need to be drug off in to crap.
the issues posed. Very amateurish, Leythos.
As far as "reputable information", are you now denying that the price of
oil has skyrocketed?
Nope, many things have cause the price of Oil to change, and little of
it has anything to do with the War on Terror. Don't be fooled by greed.
Yes.
No, it's perfectly legal and approved many years before Bush was in
office, in fact, it was used by Clinton before Bush. Since the congress
approved it, you should blame the people that put it in place.
No, there are many Enemy/Terrorists locked/held properly, according to
the rules/laws.
Are you going to continue to be a sheep and support terrorists actions?
So, what do you do with a person that has killed many others for
simply being of a particular color, race, religion, that would do it
again if you let them? Oh, yea, lock them up so that they can convert
others to their way of thinking, so that they can get released in 10
years, so that they can kill others in the Prison..... Come on,
what's your solution?
No, it's perfectly legal and approved many years before Bush was in
office, in fact, it was used by Clinton before Bush. Since the
congress approved it, you should blame the people that put it in
place.
No, there are many Enemy/Terrorists locked/held properly, according to
the rules/laws.
Are you going to continue to be a sheep and support terrorists
actions?
aka@ said:I didn't say I have the solution but killing is wrong no matter what.
The rest of your post was bs or unproven, so there is nothing to reply
too [sic].
Translation: you know you're wrong and are trying to sluff it off with
an ad hominem.
Take it how you want, but you didn't offer any reputable information on
your claims, so I didn't see the need to be drug off in to crap.
Translation: Leythos further uses ad hominems because he can't address
the issues posed. Very amateurish, Leythos.
As far as "reputable information", are you now denying that the price of
oil has skyrocketed?
Nope, many things have cause the price of Oil to change, and little of
it has anything to do with the War on Terror. Don't be fooled by greed.
Puhlease. Iraq can no longer produce oil thanks to the cowboy.
Immediately after the illegal war started, oil went up. You don't need
to be an MVP to connect the dots.
LOL! You *are* ignorant.
Actually, congress approved tapping phones with a warrant and even set
up a court to approve them. Bush decided he didn't need no stinking
warrants. Do you even read or watch the news?
Wrong. They are being held illegally and if YOU were thrown in a prison
in Cuba with no legal recourse, you would *not* be a happy camper.
I already told you I don't support Bush the Terrorist. Got a reading
comprehension problem?
Leythos wrote:
Make them converse with you.
Naw. That would truly be cruel and unusual.
LOL! You are totally dense. Did Clinton do it without getting a
warrant? Bush didn't get warrants, as the law says he must. Only in
emergencies can he do it without a warrart for 72 hours. And Bush just
ignored that law. King George needn't follow the law. King George,
like you, is totally out of his bleeding mind!
Name the rules/law.
I didn't vote for the Republican scum that thinks just like the
terrorists that violence is the solution to their problems.
Leythos said:It won't happen, it was tried, and like the rabid animal, they don't
want to change - unless everyone of us becomes just like them.
Please show where a foreign conversation was tapped without a warrant
- provide some link to a reputable, factual, document of it.
That's just the point I was making, there are no laws covering it, so,
it's not against the law - at least nothing I can find makes it
against the law. Thanks for proving the point.
It doesn't matter who is in office, the attacks on US Soil would have
happened, as they did in Clinton's terms, and no amount of talking, as
we've done that for years, would have changed it.
I feel sorry for
people that don't have the stomach to protect their own when things
get hard, but they have enough anti-American balls to complain about
it without providing any out way to resolve it that would work.
There are ways to protect you and yours without having to commit
violence to do it. Ghandi and MLK Jr. proved that. Only the
unenlightened animals among us believe that violence is the solution,
not the problem.
The violence-mongers are the true enemy of peace and liberty, no mater
what god they pray to!
kurttrail said:You are dense. And trying to have an intelligent conversation with you
is impossible, as you are totally deluded.
Leythos said:It won't happen, it was tried, and like the rabid animal, they
don't
want to change - unless everyone of us becomes just like them.
Please show where a foreign conversation was tapped without a
warrant -
provide some link to a reputable, factual, document of it.
That's just the point I was making, there are no laws covering it,
so,
it's not against the law - at least nothing I can find makes it
against
the law. Thanks for proving the point.
It doesn't matter who is in office, the attacks on US Soil would
have
happened, as they did in Clinton's terms, and no amount of
talking, as
we've done that for years, would have changed it. I feel sorry for
people that don't have the stomach to protect their own when
things get
hard, but they have enough anti-American balls to complain about
it
without providing any out way to resolve it that would work.
Leythos said:maskedandanonymous.org says...
No, your statistics are based on flawed polls - as you should be smart
enough to understand, anyone can take a poll and make the results match
what they want it to show.
I can understand your position, as you don't live in the USA or a
progressive country, but I don't agree with it. America wasn't the ones
that bought off the terrorists proving that all they have to do is
threaten them in order to get money or other resources from the
threatened country - and that may work until places like the US is no
longer a target worth their effort expended.
Leythos said:maskedandanonymous.org says...
Killing comes in many forms, some are justified, others are not. If you
kill a wounded animal that can not be helped, is it still a bad thing or
mercy? If you kill a Terrorist that has killed hundreds, like the
animal, that can't be helped (and you don't really believe Prison is
going to reform them do you), then it's almost Merciful to kill them. At
the very least they should be locked in a 1 meter square box, set out in
the open air and left there until their term is over.
Yes I listen to the Hype, but have you read the actual law? The
President does not need to get a warrant, it's in the law - you can read
it yourself if you take the time, just search for it, it's on the web.
Please site the law that's being broken.
Alias said:It's amazing, isn't it?
Leythos said:You can't wait to see if there is truth, you have to be suckered into
playing the media's dupe - and that gives comfort to the enemy during
this time where are troops are on the ground fighting.
Only a fool falls for the media hype and makes such statements, giving
comfort and fodder to our enemies before such claims by the media are
proven. Keep supporting those that are anti-American, you dishonor
yourself by falling for their hype.
I have just been
waiting for the evidence to start filtering down, and I am sure more will
now start coming now that the thumb has been removed from the hole in the
dike. You are about to see major political finger pointing and cover thou
a$$ maneuvers.
kurttrail said:Totally. I think he is an abortion that didn't take. He had all but
the reptilian portion of his brain d&c'ed.
Leythos said:The problem is that there is nothing to cover, there is nothing to
start flowing out except the truth, which will contradict what the
Media has been spewing for the last 6 years.
Finger pointing is what happens when there is no facts, no truth, and
it's done to make one site look bad, facts are not a finger pointing.
ROFL! So where do you get your supply of Kool-Aid?
You are the See-No-Evil and Hear-No-Evil monkeys all rolled up into one
delusion Lamegirl.