P
Pipboy
Yup. I'm famlliar with it.
Pan is another one.
I've used Pan in Ubuntu. 40tude is much better than Pan, IMO.
Yup. I'm famlliar with it.
Pan is another one.
Scott said:Did yo momma drop you on your head when you were a baby? ;-)
--
Scott http://angrykeyboarder.com
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
NOTICE: In-Newsgroup (and therefore off-topic) comments on my sig will
be cheerfully ignored, so don't waste our time.
Scott said:On 25 Feb 2007 04:58:11 -0800, "Cat" <[email protected]> spake
thusly:
Frankly that should have been it's name from day one. There was
eternal confusion amongst the masses when it came to Outlook and
Outlook Express.
I use Microplanet Gravity. Thunderbird works as well. Windows Mail will
act as a Usenet client.
--
Conor
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright
until you hear them speak...
Especially in Britain. <G>
DSH
You could do a lot worse than try Agent, available at www.forteinc.comBarry
Could you please name some alternatives
John Butler said:I understand that Outlook Express will be dropped from Vista.
What news reader will be available?
I never got into Eudora because it never had a newsreader. I am one of the
few who prefer an all in one program rather than seperates.
I've used Pan in Ubuntu. 40tude is much better than Pan, IMO.
I understand that Outlook Express will be dropped from Vista.
What news reader will be available?
There are other Usenet clients available, both for XP and for Vista.
There is no need to use Microsoft's "home-brew" reader.
Leythos said:I use Super Gravity and PAN (even on Windows).
They properly format messages, you don't have to fake bottom posting as
it's the norm in a real Usenet client, they wrap lines at 73 characters,
they, the use Mono Spaced fonts unless you pick different, and they are
not prone to using HTML in text groups![]()