New Friefox out

S

Steve

Grant said:
It's not 0.9. It's a 0.9 *release candidate*. The expected official
release date for 0.9 is either June 12 or June 14, depending on how stable
the RC turns out.
Click to expand...

Very true: Firefox's official page is still at v0.8, so I'll wait until that
gets updated before downloading.
 
W

Wald

Mike said:
In the past, I heard it would only be an install. Today,
I looked on the main page/download, saw the executable, not the page
you mentioned.

Glad to see it comes that way too.
Click to expand...

Well, it's true that they could be more clear on this sort of things. You
can usually find these things out on http://mozillazine.org, in the forums
(search facility) or in the comments on news items.

Regards,
Wald
 
T

That guy

Cannot see that. 0.8 is still the only version you can download....


Gorjan
jxkfr at yahoo.com
 
D

default

How does it compare with K-Meleon?

Frank
Click to expand...
There isn't much difference that I can see. I have both and have been
gravitating to K-Meleon, but can't say why exactly.

They both have excellent privacy and pop up control.

Only gripe with both is that neither supplies an "images" button the
way Netscape 4 does. When I'm searching for something, I like to run
text only and open lots of windows then just browse the text for
information and load the images if they seem necessary or worth
looking at.

They are both good and both free - try both and see.
 
M

Mike

Grant said:
It's not 0.9. It's a 0.9 *release candidate*. The expected official release
date for 0.9 is either June 12 or June 14, depending on how stable the RC turns out.
Click to expand...

I've been using Firebird 0.7 on a P166. I have a large bookmark file
from Netscape. I just started using Firefox 0.8 and it does work fine on
a P166. It seems to load a little quicker, and my bookmark file loads
much faster. Seems to be an improvement over Firebird.

Comment on Firefox vs. Firebird?

Mike Sa
 
B

BoB

Very true: Firefox's official page is still at v0.8, so I'll wait until that
gets updated before downloading.
Click to expand...

I'm not an early-bird either. When Firebird was replaced with Firefox
[.7 to .8] an installer exe was incorporated which began placing entries
into the registry. Unfortunately, the initial uninstall was not tested,
and could delete your entire Program Files folder. I can live without
those kinds of mistakes.

I'm happy with 0.7+ and will probably wait until 1.0 is just as solid
before upgrading. I'm just not into beta testing but I LOVE Firebird.

BoB
 
C

Chris Walken

BoB wrote:

I'm not an early-bird either. When Firebird was replaced with Firefox
[.7 to .8] an installer exe was incorporated which began placing entries
into the registry. Unfortunately, the initial uninstall was not tested,
and could delete your entire Program Files folder. I can live without
those kinds of mistakes.

I'm happy with 0.7+ and will probably wait until 1.0 is just as solid
before upgrading. I'm just not into beta testing but I LOVE Firebird.

BoB
Click to expand...

All versions of Firebird aka Firefox have been available without an
installer. They just don't make it easy to find for some reason. I
personally have never used the installer and never had a problem. At the
moment I'm running versions 8 and 9 RC on the same computer.

Zip version sans installer is here:

http://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/nightly/latest-0.9/

Has a couple of new features and page loads are much faster.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads

Crap cleaner 10
Thunderbird mail extraction 11
Firefox 0.9 extension bug again 1
Crossword helpers needed 18
OCR again 5
XP firewall 57
XP vs 98 current thinking? 60
Address book required 1

Top