T
The Ghost In The Machine
In comp.os.linux.advocacy, HangEveryRepubliKKKan
<[email protected]>
wrote
1972 was the point where Linux initially was predicted
to achieve critical mass in 1973, despite the fact that
it hadn't been created yet. (As one might imagine, this
sort of thing is generally only a minor setback.)
The reason it's not 1969 was because Unix was relatively
new then, and therefore everyone was predicting that *it*
would achieve critical mass instead of Linux during the
1969-1972 timeframe.
No no...you've got it all wrong. As of this year, Linux
will achieve critical mass *next* year, allowing for an
impressive string of 35 years of unbroken declarations of
critical mass next year.
Contrast this to Microsoft's mere pittance of
monopolization since about the late 1980's on the desktop
(with MS-DOS). They've only been top dog for about
18 years. Clearly, Microsoft needs to try harder here.
That started in 1987 -- about a year after Windows' initial release
of 1.0 to the public.
Yes.
<[email protected]>
wrote
Linux hasn't achieved critical mass yet? **** man, according to the
Lintards it achieved critical mass in 1985 and then again in 1986, and then
again in 1987, and in 1988 critical mass was just around the corner.
1972 was the point where Linux initially was predicted
to achieve critical mass in 1973, despite the fact that
it hadn't been created yet. (As one might imagine, this
sort of thing is generally only a minor setback.)
The reason it's not 1969 was because Unix was relatively
new then, and therefore everyone was predicting that *it*
would achieve critical mass instead of Linux during the
1969-1972 timeframe.
Then it achieved critical mass in 1990, and was on the verge in 1991, and in
1993 it was almost there, and then in 1994, it had achieved the milestone
and had finally reached critical mass.
No no...you've got it all wrong. As of this year, Linux
will achieve critical mass *next* year, allowing for an
impressive string of 35 years of unbroken declarations of
critical mass next year.
Contrast this to Microsoft's mere pittance of
monopolization since about the late 1980's on the desktop
(with MS-DOS). They've only been top dog for about
18 years. Clearly, Microsoft needs to try harder here.
In 1995, it was just months away, and in 1998, it was once again almost
there, and in 2000 Linux was taking over from Windows, then in 2001, it's
percentage of the market had actually declined, but it was almost there.
And then in 2006 Windows was dead and Microsoft bankrupt,
and Linux was soon to be king... But now in 2007, Linux has
not yet reached critical mass, and Microsoft profits are up 23%.
That started in 1987 -- about a year after Windows' initial release
of 1.0 to the public.
Ahahahahahahahahahahahah...... It's always tomorrow in Lintard Land.....
Yes.