I want to build a blazing fast PC

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gus Oliver Davis
  • Start date Start date
Leythos said:
Here's my defense of my Opinion - I've installed many Dual CPU
workstations and found that the increase in productivity was measurable
over a weeks time. I have also found people that didn't benefit from Dual
CPU systems because they didn't do any serious - serious being defined as
anything that uses more than 5% CPU cycles on a regular basis. I can't
define serious like you are, I consider serious as it relates to
CPU/System load. Understand now?
Click to expand...

I understood before--you have no idea what you're talking about, and
continue to make stupid unsupported assertions. What do you mean by
"measureable"? Where's your *testable* data? How come all of a sudden
an "Opinion" is now a "measureable" fact? And I hope you see the
circularity of your logic now--the alleged benefit is for those people
who can benefit. Brilliant!!
 
Rick said:
Video editing would work better/faster with dual processors
Click to expand...

And your point is...? I didn't say that there is *no* possible benefit
from dual processors.
 
Raymond said:
And your point is...? I didn't say that there is *no* possible benefit
from dual proces
Click to expand...
My point is that dual processors do have a place and you comments seem
to imply that they do not. You seem to take this thread as a personal
threat. Dual processors and dual video boards speed up a lot of
applications. So please give it a rest.

R.
 
Rick said:
My point is that dual processors do have a place and you comments seem
to imply that they do not. You seem to take this thread as a personal
threat. Dual processors and dual video boards speed up a lot of
applications. So please give it a rest.

R.
Click to expand...

If it weren't for stupid people this would be no fun at all. I repeat--I
*never* said, and never *suggested* that dual processors do not "have a
place." The idiot Leythos said that dual processors will benefit those
who do "serious work" with their computers. He didn't say they will
benefit *some* people who do serious work, and perhaps not others. I was
merely pointing out the error in his statement and his circular logic.
 
I understood before--you have no idea what you're talking about, and
continue to make stupid unsupported assertions. What do you mean by
"measureable"? Where's your *testable* data? How come all of a sudden
an "Opinion" is now a "measureable" fact? And I hope you see the
circularity of your logic now--the alleged benefit is for those people
who can benefit. Brilliant!!
Click to expand...

Um, I don't see where I am required to provide any proof to my statement.
I didn't ask you to believe me, I only posted what I know and you don't
have to believe it, but you don't have any proof to discount my experience.
 
Leythos said that dual processors will benefit those who do "serious
work" with their computers.
Click to expand...

And I stand behind that - if you are doing serious work, not work that is
serious, then you benefit.
 
| On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:16:50 -0600, Raymond J. Johnson Jr. wrote:
| >
| > Leythos said that dual processors will benefit those who do "serious
| > work" with their computers.
|
| And I stand behind that - if you are doing serious work, not work that is
| serious, then you benefit.
|

I apologize for beating a dead horse. You're doing a much better job of
demonstrating your intellectual deficit than I can.
 
| On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 20:16:50 -0600, Raymond J. Johnson Jr. wrote:
| >
| > Leythos said that dual processors will benefit those who do "serious
| > work" with their computers.
|
| And I stand behind that - if you are doing serious work, not work that is
| serious, then you benefit.

I apologize for beating a dead horse. You're doing a much better job of
demonstrating your intellectual deficit than I can.
Click to expand...

So, since you don't have a valid point, you resort to insults as a means
to show your maturity?
 
i will butt in one more time.. Ray pointed out that the term "serious work"
to define the possibility of need for dual processors is totally meaningless
and i find your responses to that statement and the ensuing debate utterly
hilarious.
 
i will butt in one more time.. Ray pointed out that the term "serious work"
to define the possibility of need for dual processors is totally meaningless
and i find your responses to that statement and the ensuing debate utterly
hilarious.
Click to expand...

Glad to have been of help in bringing a smile to your face - it was only
possible through the ignorance of Ray and the Dual CPU's of this
workstation :-)
 
Back
Top