G
Guest
I am amazed how blind you are.
You call vista a new technology ???? where ?? or maybe im the blind to don't
see the NEW and only see the mem hungry, lack of innovation, slow and
expensive product than vista is ??
Tiberius said:one more thing that people who say XP was not good before service packs:
This is misleading! Xp was very good even without service packs!
It was the attacks that evolved durring its lifetime that forced it to
become more sercure via the service packs... in other words the service
packs are mainly for security patches .. security patches for threats
that did not exist when XP came out!
So how can you say XP was not good when it came out if the threats did not
exist??
This is misleading.. and a bad excuse to try to say "Hey vista will not be
good until a SP1". Nope, XP was good right out of the box,
vista is Crap right out of the box and a service pack cannot change the
reasons why its crap: maily
Bad interface and user experience design (a service pack wont change the
GUI!!!)
and SLOW SLUGGY performance... (dont expect a service pack to make vista
go much faster)
oK, let say than is no slow but mem hungry, lack of innovation, buggy and
expensive product than vista is ... i cant give a tons of reasons to say
than vista is not a good product, this could be and should be considering
concept a good, innovating so, but in the way some was lost ...
blind ???
Obviously people like you are to stupid to use new technology, go get a
refill cartridge for your typewritter.
blind ???
Obviously people like you are to stupid to use new technology, go get a
refill cartridge for your typewritter.
Tiberius said:I didn't come into this group for a few days, and now saw that people
are saying exactly the same things I have been crying out for so long, and
have been
called a troll.
DanS said:Ahhh. Here's the big sticker Jay. You've only been here a few days you
say,
so you missed those threads, there haven't been any lately, that had
several staunch Vista supporters insisting that Vista DOES run faster on
identical hardware than XP. The point was Vista is so much better than XP
that it overcame all of the bloat and extra stuff and managed to make apps
run faster.
Tiberius said:Unfortunaly, if you do the amount of work I do on the internet,
viruses and malware do slip in from time to time, even though you may have
the best antivirus apps.
It doesn't happen often, but it does.. and as I said in those cases I
catch them myself.
Plus I have to clean many computers for others, and I can find out the
problem fast...
Larry Maturo said:Hi Tiberius,
I'm not here to dispute you, just to share an amusing incident I had.
When I
had Windows 98 my registry got corrupted. Nothing could fix it. ME came
out, so I decided to install it to see it if it could do anything. The
installation
fixed the registry problem. Because of that I like ME, dispite any other
prolems it might have had.
frenchie b said:Hi everyone i am not a boffin or pc nerd i have just purchased a new pc
that
came with vista basic what can i say. we are going backwards this os is
crap
after loosing over 3.000 pictures at the click of a button
i am going back to
xp. the vista o.s is not user friendly and me and my partner find it hard
if
not impossible to do the basic tasks we used to perform on xp.
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.