I would agree about the Knowledge Base search, way too broad with
too many matching entries. Plus articles themselves have too many
sub-links.
In my own case, it was like the product morphed into some kind of
PITA over a short time period. For a while, I recommended it and
installed a number of Symantec installs. Suddenly, I started getting
Service Calls with issue(s). In almost every one of them, the time to
resolve quickly became hours instead of minutes. Screwy subscription
renewals and upgrades that just wouldn't work. I've quit logging the
count, but it's probably over 100+. It's just too much work to maintain it
and my profit-per-call on Symantec issues isn't worth it. It's surpassed
AOL as the "Oh Damn, you're running that on your PC".
I had already given up on McAfee after years of Corporate IT that
used their stuff. Only AV I ever saw that deleted more mailboxes than
viruses.
When I finally gave up on Symantec, I spent a couple of months testing
alternate products. Kaspersky was probably the winner, but it's price
moved me to pick eTrust. These days, I probably deploy more AVG
free than anything else.
Really it's just a personal choice - I should preface my comments about
Symantec/Norton to include "I Don't like it, because it's hard to support
and can't make any profit working on it". Anyway Good Luck with it.