For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners

  • Thread starter Thread starter John Doe
  • Start date Start date
Your key board cost money and your mouse isn't any more responsive
than a MX1000.
Click to expand...

You're comparing an MX510 to an MX1000. Compare 518 not 510. MX1000
has skipping issues going by what I read at that forum posted in this
thread. With 518 I can run it at various DPI settings on the fly up to
1600 DPI, 510 only does 800 DPI. Different games are sometimes better
at lower or higher DPI settings, when sniping you may want to lower
the DPI for more finer control. That's why it's called a "gamer's"
mouse. I can get the 510 for $29.99 CAD right now, the 518 goes for
$59.99 CAD. There's a reason it costs more.
 
Fisher said:
That was a pointless troll.
Click to expand...

How many times have you been knocked out of the sky, off a ledge, out of a
foxhole, lazered, or headshot by a cordless mouse? None I'm sure..... and
the 'bat' makes the hitter....... dude its your OPINION, furthest from fact
as any statement can be... marketing monkey
 
Troll
Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!pd7tw1no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
Message-ID: <c2kgc19kgg3of4ipkk6t65047k7b65fu68 4ax.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 7
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 20:48:42 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
X-Trace: pd7tw1no 1120423722 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:48:42 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:48:42 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440195 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:740001



All wireless devices have some lag. Whether you notice it or not is
another matter.
Click to expand...
 
Fisher <http://groups-beta.google.com/advanced_search?num=100
You're comparing an MX510 to an MX1000. Compare 518 not 510.
MX1000 has skipping issues going by what I read at that forum
posted in this thread.
Click to expand...

So your dozens of troll posts in this thread "For Logitech MX1000
laser mouse owners" are based on zero experience.

I guess you are just begging to be sold on the mouse.



Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!pd7cy2so!pd7cy1no!shaw.ca!pd7tw2no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.71.93.197
From: Fisher <fisher no_email.here>
Newsgroups: alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
Message-ID: <6clgc1h2pahlnkgbqudufmuosu3d761fas 4ax.com>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.92/32.572
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 21:20:05 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.67.253.205
X-Complaints-To: (e-mail address removed)
X-Trace: pd7tw2no 1120425605 24.67.253.205 (Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:20:05 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 03 Jul 2005 15:20:05 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440202 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:740012
Click to expand...

See also: James Calivar
 
All wireless devices have some lag. Whether you notice it or not is
another matter.
Click to expand...
If you can't notice it what's the problem? And BTW this thread is
about the mx1000 not all wireless devices.
Maybe you could help me out here and give me some FACTS on this lag
that all wireless devices have ? Then tell me the lag of the mx1000.
 
Which keyboard? I bought the MX700 Duo and my keyboard doesn't last
anymore than a few months on the batteries. Maybe I got a duff
keyboard, I've already suggested that.
Click to expand...

It's their latest (what ever they call it) my old one took batteries
far more often though.
Maybe you bought crap batteries?
 
No. You look up the MX518 and read what it can do for a gamer then get
back to me.
Click to expand...

I have and all it does is change DPI on the fly...BIG WOOOOOP!
But what does that have to do with marketing ? (That's a trick
question BTW)
 
Bollocks! I was talking the MX518 which can do 1600DPI. The 510 can
only do 800DPI. And I'm reading lots of complaints of skipping
problems with the MX1000 so Tom's Hardware talks shit, once again.
Click to expand...

But the thread is about the MX 1000 NOTG THE MX510 DUH!!!!
You obviously aren't concerned with facts so have fun playing with
your corded mouse. But if you're going to talk bad about a product (Mx
1000) at least know what you're talking about first.

With the MX518 I can change the DPI setting at will which allows me to
adjust the sensitivity during gameplay so that I can use various
settings for sniper mode etc. That's what makes it the best gaming
mouse on the market, and the fact it is cordless means no more
recharging crap and added weight due to batteries.
Click to expand...

You must be one weak dude if you can't push a cordless mouse around.
 
You're comparing an MX510 to an MX1000. Compare 518 not 510.
Click to expand...

Actually I didn't compare them Tom did. Maybe I'm mistaken here but
the tread is about the MX 1000 not the MX 510.

I think if you think a little you would see that the MX 1000 was
compared to the 510 because it was the current "gamers" mouse at the
time. You said that "gamer" mice had to better for a reason because
they called it a "Gamers mouse" and they would do that for no good
reason. Has you can see from the article that isn't always true.

I say just wait and we'll see a laser with the same ability in the
future and it to will be better than the 518. The fact is that your
opinions are just that.
MX1000
has skipping issues going by what I read at that forum posted in this
thread. With 518 I can run it at various DPI settings on the fly up to
1600 DPI, 510 only does 800 DPI. Different games are sometimes better
at lower or higher DPI settings, when sniping you may want to lower
the DPI for more finer control. That's why it's called a "gamer's"
mouse. I can get the 510 for $29.99 CAD right now, the 518 goes for
$59.99 CAD. There's a reason it costs more.
Click to expand...
LOL
Yes it cost more because its the latest model, period.
 
the malodorous said:
Troll
Click to expand...

Thanks, I will!

Now that we have established that you're a kiddie-fiddler and we have access
to your records, what do you propose to do?

--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.
 
another extremely active troll (see the Windows XP groups),
attempting to change the follow-up groups
Path: newssvr19.news.prodigy.com!newsdbm06.news.prodigy.com!newsdst02.news.prodigy.com!newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.com!newscon06.news.prodigy.com!prodigy.net!news-feed01.roc.ny.frontiernet.net!nntp.frontiernet.net!newsfeed2.telusplanet.net!newsfeed.telus.net!cyclone.bc.net!news.alt.net!bnewsoutpeer00.bru.ops.eu.uu.nat!$3ef82b3c!133.256.1.103.MISMATCH!not-for-mail
From: Lord Gazwad of Grantham <gazwad my-shit-dont-stink.com>
Newsgroups: alt.os.windows-xp,alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt,comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action
Subject: Re: For Logitech MX1000 laser mouse owners
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2005 10:59:42 +0100
Organization: rec.arts.dead.fish
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <ded16808e81643c38a03b5cd370fcf54 rec.arts.dead.fish>
References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <0332713faca64366895261d147d6cf53@pd7tw1no> <[email protected]> <2f0eaa2a926042efacb4f35c30f4e0c7@pd7tw1no> <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
X-Complaints-To: http://www.usenetabuse.com
X-Face: "*3B$CjKMbm3M]BW|]?5:`j2r,G@epSM$AA#o"82#i(zQjGOy;`UcS}J^\>yLIHP$!D})R% +MQ,bzU/|II]]zr<]==Z<C>.iKJ2RGg,02Fa_"1QGeH*vO3%<9O{,w9VMoXH&GQgL8fk[I&9_EM$gf &T"4L6\A=JXlhn!(guJZR2$wc;s`}d3}wjyG*vS9F-dbx/}?vRjBau89C)VSP*=l_C8`XnRWaw>T}! x5];;,$C\?32'Y>^]q3d.
Xref: newsmst01b.news.prodigy.com alt.os.windows-xp:450478 alt.comp.hardware.pc-homebuilt:440252 comp.sys.ibm.pc.games.action:740145

the malodorous said:
Troll
Click to expand...

Thanks, I will!

Now that we have established that you're a kiddie-fiddler and we have access
to your records, what do you propose to do?

--
For my own part, I have never had a thought which I could not set down
in words with even more distinctness than that with which I conceived
it. There is, however, a class of fancies of exquisite delicacy which
are not thoughts, and to which as yet I have found it absolutely
impossible to adapt to language. These fancies arise in the soul, alas
how rarely. Only at epochs of most intense tranquillity, when the
bodily and mental health are in perfection. And at those weird points
of time, where the confines of the waking world blend with the world of
dreams. And so I captured this fancy, where all that we see, or seem,
is but a dream within a dream.
Click to expand...
 
If you can't notice it what's the problem? And BTW this thread is
about the mx1000 not all wireless devices.
Maybe you could help me out here and give me some FACTS on this lag
that all wireless devices have ? Then tell me the lag of the mx1000.
Click to expand...

I don't know the *exact* figures but use your ****ing noggin' and use
some common sense. ALL WIRELESS DEVICES HAVE SOME LAG. Learn it now.
 
I have and all it does is change DPI on the fly...BIG WOOOOOP!
But what does that have to do with marketing ? (That's a trick
question BTW)
Click to expand...

The question is "what does that do for a gamer?", marketing has
nothing to do with it.
 
I think if you think a little you would see that the MX 1000 was
compared to the 510 because it was the current "gamers" mouse at the
time. You said that "gamer" mice had to better for a reason because
they called it a "Gamers mouse" and they would do that for no good
reason. Has you can see from the article that isn't always true.
Click to expand...

The 510 was never marketed as a "gamer's" mouse.
Yes it cost more because its the latest model, period.
Click to expand...

No, also because it is better - period.
 
Fisher said:
I don't know the *exact* figures but use your ****ing noggin' and use
some common sense. ALL WIRELESS DEVICES HAVE SOME LAG. Learn it now.
Click to expand...

if there is such a lag.....hey nanosecond counter get over yourself..you'll
believe anything I guess
 
Back
Top