Terry said:
I can read what you stated.
I'm confused. %-(
What I had stated in a previous post, that was wiped out by Peter top
posting using a delimiter. If you know the purpose of a delimiter, it
is ridiculous to add one when top posting, which is what MS clients
do. They weren't designed for it that way. Most newsreaders
removes the delimiter and everything below it. MS clients to not do
that so the developers thought it okay to use a delimiter when top
posting? Why, if the MS client ignores them anyway?
You bottom posted and don't have a delimiter. So when someone replies
to you your text will remain. Follow this thread from the beginning
and you will see what I mean.[/QUOTE]
I've been following. You had originally said to Mike:
<quote>
But here is a perfect example, you have to admit that the newsreader you
are using FAILED to remove the delimiter and the sig below it when you
replied to Lethos. THIS is the point we have been trying to make. The
MS mail/news clients are broken. My client (Thunderbird), properly
removed your delimiter and sig, which is the correct thing to do. And
when a client does it CORRECTLY, the clients that add the delimiter
INCORRECTLY when top posting, will remove everything below the
delimiter, something they were designed to do.
Why is it only the ones using the broken clients defend a flaw that is
so clearly evident? We're not blasting you directly, but only your (and
others) failure to see how most newsreaders work, and fix it so we can
"all get along".
</quote>
Peter's reply to you quoted your first three sentences. He purposefully
snipped the rest.
Then again, your material was *directly* below his sig (foolish!). This
has the unsettling effect of your words becoming part of his sig!
Now, whenever someone replies to that post, *that's* when your material
disappears.
Normally...
Although I use OE, I'm knowledgeable enough to also use OE QuoteFix. So,
normally, when I reply to a post with a delimiter, the delimiter and
everything below disappear -- as they should. However, I'm not quite
sure what Peter did, but when I was about to reply the same post, I
noticed the following in my reply window:
___________________________________________________
Peter said:
Terry
You are in the wrong here.
___________________________________________________
I assume he was trying to be clever, and I suppose he succeeded because
I'm not sure how he did that! Perhaps it was the "news : %" ?