J
John Smith
As I have said.. Vista is not more secure than XP, in fact its worse.. far
worse..
I wont go into the hundreds of reasons why the above statement is true.. but
I will
give you this:
"Recently, there has been talk of Microsoft scraping the traditional Windows
registry in favor of an alternative, in the evolution from Windows Vista SP1
and Windows XP SP3 to Windows 7. Such a scenario is simply ridiculous. Could
Microsoft do it? In a heart bit. Will Microsoft do it? No. Why? Well the
answer is simple. And at the same time it is connected with the reason why
the Redmond company has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows
Vista, despite the fact that it served the latest Windows client five years
after XP. "
AND I REPEAT:::>>>>>
has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows Vista, despite the
fact that it served the latest Windows client five years after XP
AND I REPEAT YET AGAIN>>>>>
has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows Vista, despite the
fact that it served the latest Windows client five years after XP
read the full article here:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-More-Registry-from-Vista-SP1-and-XP-SP3-to-Windows-7-76470.shtml
As time goes by, the monstrosity called VISTA will be unraveled and the
truth will shine. Already more and more people think vista is sh!t.
Next step is them to really understand WHY.
worse..
I wont go into the hundreds of reasons why the above statement is true.. but
I will
give you this:
"Recently, there has been talk of Microsoft scraping the traditional Windows
registry in favor of an alternative, in the evolution from Windows Vista SP1
and Windows XP SP3 to Windows 7. Such a scenario is simply ridiculous. Could
Microsoft do it? In a heart bit. Will Microsoft do it? No. Why? Well the
answer is simple. And at the same time it is connected with the reason why
the Redmond company has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows
Vista, despite the fact that it served the latest Windows client five years
after XP. "
AND I REPEAT:::>>>>>
has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows Vista, despite the
fact that it served the latest Windows client five years after XP
AND I REPEAT YET AGAIN>>>>>
has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows Vista, despite the
fact that it served the latest Windows client five years after XP
read the full article here:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-More-Registry-from-Vista-SP1-and-XP-SP3-to-Windows-7-76470.shtml
As time goes by, the monstrosity called VISTA will be unraveled and the
truth will shine. Already more and more people think vista is sh!t.
Next step is them to really understand WHY.
