T
Tibery-OS
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Vist...t-Had-Given-Less-Vista-SP2-Anyone-67571.shtml
Microsoft had the chance to position the first service pack for Windows
Vista as a panacea for the operating system, giving the platform nothing
less than a fresh start and another take at the Wow. Instead, Vista SP1 will
deliver close to nothing. Users should expect little, because they will get
it in full, and because Microsoft could not have given anything less with
the refresh. And if you believe that the company didn't try, then you are
sadly mistaken. Microsoft in fact stripped Vista SP1 down to the bare bones,
leaving only the essential architecture that would qualify as a service
pack. All strictly non-essential features, capabilities, features and
improvements were
killed from the status of concept, none of them making it to the embryonic
stage.
A member of the Windows Installer Team explained why they had to pull
references for Windows Installer 4.1, designed especially for Windows Vista
SP1, from MSDN and to cancel version 4.1 altogether. "What changed was that
the new guard in Windows had a very different bar for the Vista SP than had
been in practice for previous releases (at least in my memory). Generally
there is lip service to no large feature work in a SP but this time folks
listened. Big feature adds were heavily scrutinized. The items we wanted to
fix in the SP, UAC tweaks, were big feature by the new bar. When the UAC
tweaks were rejected for Vista SP1, the justification for 4.1 faded as there
were no new features in the Windows Installer in Vista SP1," the Windows
Installer Team member stated.
The new guard at Microsoft is formed by Kevin Johnson, President, Platforms
& Services Division; Jon DeVaan, Senior Vice President, Windows Core
Operating System Division and Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President,
Windows and Windows Live Engineering Group...although the last executive
might be more familiar to you as Steven codename Translucency Sinofsky, the
source of the Windows Omerta. By comparison, the old guard involved Jim
Allchin, (Former) Co-President, Platforms & Services Division; Brian
Valentine (former) senior vice president of the Windows Division and Chris
Jones, Corporate Vice President, Windows Live Experience Program Management.
Johnson, DeVaan and Sinofsky lowered the standard as much as possible on the
features that would end up in Vista SP1. In this context, the service pack
will be comprised of regular Windows Vista updates, application
compatibility improvements, device driver improvements, enhancements to
performance, reliability and security and a few tweaks to the default
desktop search mechanism. Vista SP1 will be nothing more than a standard
service pack, planned for the first quarter of 2008. However, the
generalized consumer perception, and the continuous user preference focused
on Windows XP seem to point to the fact that Vista would actually need a SP2
that will be a repeat of the second service pack for XP.
Microsoft had the chance to position the first service pack for Windows
Vista as a panacea for the operating system, giving the platform nothing
less than a fresh start and another take at the Wow. Instead, Vista SP1 will
deliver close to nothing. Users should expect little, because they will get
it in full, and because Microsoft could not have given anything less with
the refresh. And if you believe that the company didn't try, then you are
sadly mistaken. Microsoft in fact stripped Vista SP1 down to the bare bones,
leaving only the essential architecture that would qualify as a service
pack. All strictly non-essential features, capabilities, features and
improvements were
killed from the status of concept, none of them making it to the embryonic
stage.
A member of the Windows Installer Team explained why they had to pull
references for Windows Installer 4.1, designed especially for Windows Vista
SP1, from MSDN and to cancel version 4.1 altogether. "What changed was that
the new guard in Windows had a very different bar for the Vista SP than had
been in practice for previous releases (at least in my memory). Generally
there is lip service to no large feature work in a SP but this time folks
listened. Big feature adds were heavily scrutinized. The items we wanted to
fix in the SP, UAC tweaks, were big feature by the new bar. When the UAC
tweaks were rejected for Vista SP1, the justification for 4.1 faded as there
were no new features in the Windows Installer in Vista SP1," the Windows
Installer Team member stated.
The new guard at Microsoft is formed by Kevin Johnson, President, Platforms
& Services Division; Jon DeVaan, Senior Vice President, Windows Core
Operating System Division and Steven Sinofsky, Senior Vice President,
Windows and Windows Live Engineering Group...although the last executive
might be more familiar to you as Steven codename Translucency Sinofsky, the
source of the Windows Omerta. By comparison, the old guard involved Jim
Allchin, (Former) Co-President, Platforms & Services Division; Brian
Valentine (former) senior vice president of the Windows Division and Chris
Jones, Corporate Vice President, Windows Live Experience Program Management.
Johnson, DeVaan and Sinofsky lowered the standard as much as possible on the
features that would end up in Vista SP1. In this context, the service pack
will be comprised of regular Windows Vista updates, application
compatibility improvements, device driver improvements, enhancements to
performance, reliability and security and a few tweaks to the default
desktop search mechanism. Vista SP1 will be nothing more than a standard
service pack, planned for the first quarter of 2008. However, the
generalized consumer perception, and the continuous user preference focused
on Windows XP seem to point to the fact that Vista would actually need a SP2
that will be a repeat of the second service pack for XP.