MS antivirus update

F

Frank Bohan

When I looked at my machine a few minutes ago there was an update msg from
MS
for the antispyware. I took it and then when I checked the About under
Help the
expire date is now July 2006.

Lou

I seem to recall that they did this once before. I have not yet received the
message from MS.

===

Frank Bohan
¶ Kilroy occupied these coordinates.
 
R

Richard Steinfeld

John said:
Richard Steinfeld wrote:


Note my new sig:

Gotcha. Appreciated.

However, with consideration, I think that we all agree with you, so you
don't have to point it out. Most of us hate spammers, and don't
appreciate the other software that sneaks into this discussion. So, it
becomes a statement that's like, "I breathe air. I eat food."

Hmmm. Your sig text is appearing in my Thunderbird as gray, and in my
reply, it's invisible. How'd you do that?

Ironically, I brought up an issue of a certain form of payware in
another thread, and I was asked to make it a root topic here: install
trackers and uninstallers -- there's not one of them that's free any
more, and if we go trying freeware willie-nillie, sooner or later, a few
of us are going to find ourselves in a nasty system "gotcha." In
self-defense, we're going to have to bite the bullet and discuss
non-free uninstallers here. Or many of us will pay dearly. What do you
think?

Richard


Richard
 
?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=

Hmmm. Your sig text is appearing in my Thunderbird as gray, and in
my reply, it's invisible. How'd you do that?

A sig should be preceeded by two dashes and a space on a line of their
own. Thunderbird respects that signature delimiter, and presents it in
another color. You can probably change the appearance somewhere in the
view options. For me, sigs are blue. Most newsreaders will strip the
sig when replying, another good reason to use the delimiter.
 
J

John Corliss

Richard said:
Gotcha. Appreciated.

However, with consideration, I think that we all agree with you, so you
don't have to point it out. Most of us hate spammers, and don't
appreciate the other software that sneaks into this discussion. So, it
becomes a statement that's like, "I breathe air. I eat food."

Hmmm. Your sig text is appearing in my Thunderbird as gray, and in my
reply, it's invisible. How'd you do that?

I didn't do it. Thunderbird did.
Ironically, I brought up an issue of a certain form of payware in
another thread, and I was asked to make it a root topic here: install
trackers and uninstallers -- there's not one of them that's free any
more, and if we go trying freeware willie-nillie, sooner or later, a few
of us are going to find ourselves in a nasty system "gotcha." In
self-defense, we're going to have to bite the bullet and discuss
non-free uninstallers here. Or many of us will pay dearly. What do you
think?

Well, we don't have a freeware truetype font editor either, but we don't
talk about commercial ones.

This group is supposed to be for the discussion of freeware. If there is
no program in a certain category, then .... we're out of luck.
Discussion of non-freeware in this group, with a few exceptions like
donationware or certain liteware etc., is just plain a bad idea.

As for the installation monitoring program, the last freeware version of
Total Uninstall (2.35) is still available here:

http://freeware4u.com/modules/mydownloads/singlefile.php?lid=234
http://digilander.libero.it/molearchive3/tun235.zip

I still use it. But another way to do this is to take a snapshot of your
hard drive both before and after installation, and back up your
registry. That, combined with system restore (if you have it) will kill
any installation.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls and other such idiots. No adware, cdware,
commercial software, crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware,
shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez
please.
 
T

technomaNge

John said:
--------------------------------------------------------

Well, I know it isn't Grisoft. I've seen several articles about it
acquiring a company named Sybari though.

"Resistance is futile."

John, it IS worse than you think. See

http://www.microsoft.com/security/partners/antivirus.asp

where it says (in part) "Antivirus software is available from a
variety of Microsoft partners, including the following:"
then lists 25 companies.


technomaNge
 
J

John Corliss

technomaNge said:
John, it IS worse than you think. See

http://www.microsoft.com/security/partners/antivirus.asp

where it says (in part) "Antivirus software is available from a variety
of Microsoft partners, including the following:"
then lists 25 companies.

Looks like they're all there. However, being a partner isn't the same as
being "assimilated". 80)>

This brings a (I'm sure naive) question to mind though; what freeware
antivirus programs are available for Linux?

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls and other such idiots. No adware, cdware,
commercial software, crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware,
shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez
please.
 
R

Roger G

This brings a (I'm sure naive) question to mind though; what freeware
antivirus programs are available for Linux?

Well, now some naive soul will tell you that "we don't need AV in Linux"
:)))))))))))

BTW, thanks for shortening your sig. Pheeewww
 
J

John Corliss

Roger said:
Well, now some naive soul will tell you that "we don't need AV in Linux"
:)))))))))))

BTW, thanks for shortening your sig. Pheeewww

Still don't understand why signature file size is such an issue with
some people. Mostly it's a holdover from low bandwidth days.

Most people (like me) simply ignore large sig files. Life is too short.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls and other such idiots. No adware, cdware,
commercial software, crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware,
shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez
please.
 
R

Roger G

Pheeewww
Still don't understand why signature file size is such an issue with some
people. Mostly it's a holdover from low bandwidth days.

Most people (like me) simply ignore large sig files. Life is too short.

Oh, so you think is OK to post in HTML then?
 
A

Azzman

Still don't understand why signature file size is such an issue with
some people. Mostly it's a holdover from low bandwidth days.

Most people (like me) simply ignore large sig files. Life is too short.

You could also ignore trolls, spam, top-posting, etc. Life is too short
indeed.
But simple usenet-tiquette makes that short life a little more comfortable
for all of us.
Just my two €-cents.
 
P

Peter Seiler

John Corliss - 01.12.2005 13:05 :
Still don't understand why signature file size is such an issue with
some people. Mostly it's a holdover from low bandwidth days.

Most people (like me) simply ignore large sig files. Life is too short.

John, other people (like me) tries sometimes in extreme causes (mostly
without success) convincing asocial/egoistic usenet behavior, that a
minimum of usenet-tiquette (hello Azzman) has to do with (usenet-)
experiences, education, respect, usenet-netticette, -"rules" etc..

Even more egoistic, thoughtless behavior are the endless fullquotings
cumulating especially within longer threads. Most people dont know/care
about how to quote. And if you give *friendly* recommendation on how to
do, you get kiddish and/or vulgair (**** etc.) responses like "usenet is
free, so everybody can do what he wants". Yes, we live in a more and
more egoistic reckless world :-(
 
J

John Corliss

Roger said:
John Corliss wrote:
Pheeewww


Oh, so you think is OK to post in HTML then?

Roger, I never said that. Please don't extrapolate from my remarks.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls and other such idiots. No adware, cdware,
commercial software, crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware,
shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez
please.
 
J

John Corliss

Azzman said:
You could also ignore trolls, spam,

This would be a bad analogy because usenet annoyances are subject to the
"matter of degree" principle - Trolls and spam being over the top.

Most likely you've never been piled on by trolls like I have either. I
will *not* allow killfiled trolls to make a smartass reply and have it
appear that I'm "afraid" to respond or have been overcome by their
"mighty trolldom". That will not change. Yes, it probably is an "ego"
problem, but that's simply the way it is.
top-posting,

Most people who top-post are either trolls or newbies. Trolls do it
intentionally and in order to cause problems, newbies usually stop doing
it when things are nicely explained to them and they see how it aids
reading the posts.

However, in all this discussion of signature files, I've yet to see any
good reason for making such a big deal about their size.
etc. Life is too short indeed.
But simple usenet-tiquette makes that short life a little more comfortable
for all of us.
Just my two €-cents.

Well, I pretty much agree, but I'm afraid that my signature file will
remain as it is. As I've said to others, if it bothers a person all they
have to do is to killfile my posts. I certainly don't have the largest
signature file of the regular posters to this group.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls and other such idiots. No adware, cdware,
commercial software, crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware,
shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez
please.
 
P

Peter Seiler

John Corliss - 01.12.2005 19:47 :
Well, I pretty much agree, but I'm afraid that my signature file will
remain as it is. As I've said to others, if it bothers a person all they
have to do is to killfile my posts. I certainly don't have the largest
signature file of the regular posters to this group.

John, if a SIG is about 5 lines it doesn't matter, is not very
important. Otherwise I have seen SIGs with hundreds! of lines because
the author put all quoting lines into the SIG. So, often it's difficult
determining, what is to tolerate and what is too much...

And more than often I hear from reposters to which I recommendated
*friendly* a better quoting behavior (avoid fullquoting) similar
arguments you are using above:

"my quoting and or topposting, "--" false SIG-delimter etc. will remain
as is...usenet is absolutely free and I do what I want to do my way and
nobody has to give me any behavior suggestions, you moron...etc."

You understand what I mean? (excuse: English is not my native language).
 
T

technomaNge

John said:
Looks like they're all there. However, being a partner isn't the same as
being "assimilated". 80)>

This brings a (I'm sure naive) question to mind though; what freeware
antivirus programs are available for Linux?

Only one I know of is Clam-something (Mr. Google knows!).
I'm using a linux machine and don't worry about virus stuff,
mainly because I do not run as root (Administrator to Windows folks)
so the worst that could happen is I kill the user account and
make a new one.

Plus, Windows viruses don't run on linux.

technomaNge
 
D

dszady

John said:
Looks like they're all there. However, being a partner isn't the same as
being "assimilated". 80)>

This brings a (I'm sure naive) question to mind though; what freeware
antivirus programs are available for Linux?
F-Prot.
Bit Defender.
I sprinkle my hard drive with Eicar files and Bit Offender does NOT pick
up archived viruses. BD has been chucked.
I don't trust ClamAV because it's not updated often enough.
Unfortunately, supposedly the best in the world, "Kaspersky", needs IE
to run.
I also run chkrootkit and Rkhunter. Rkhunter being far superior. If you
read about "rootkit", it's kinda scary. "Re-install OS." Huh? Might as
well update to Mandriva 2006.
 
D

David

F-Prot.
Bit Defender.
I sprinkle my hard drive with Eicar files and Bit Offender does NOT pick
up archived viruses. BD has been chucked.
I don't trust ClamAV because it's not updated often enough.
Unfortunately, supposedly the best in the world, "Kaspersky", needs IE
to run.
I also run chkrootkit and Rkhunter. Rkhunter being far superior. If you
read about "rootkit", it's kinda scary. "Re-install OS." Huh? Might as
well update to Mandriva 2006.

I just tried that on a machine that will not run Win98SE. I had
Mandrake 10.1 on it and it was behaving quite well. I decided to
upgrade to Mandriva Free 2006 and it locks solid about thirty seconds
after opening KDE. Oh well! Back to 10.1 I suppose.
--
David
Remove "farook" to reply
At the bottom of the application where it says
"sign here". I put "Sagittarius"
E-mail: justdas at iinet dot net dot au
 
J

John Corliss

Azzman said:

Thanks for the list. I'll save that one to a file. And since that's how
I run AVG in Windows, it won't be a big deal for me.

--
Regards from John Corliss
I don't reply to trolls and other such idiots. No adware, cdware,
commercial software, crippleware, demoware, nagware, PROmotionware,
shareware, spyware, time-limited software, trialware, viruses or warez
please.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Top