XP licensce transferrable?

2

20100222

You're a clueless putz with no social nor mental skills. You know nothing,
especially concerning MVPs slime mouth.
Now go create another user name for tomorrow as I'll be using date names
from now on, numbnutz.

hth !
 
P

Peter Foldes

Gordon

He is not new at all but keeps he changing his name. He is usually deleted off the
server and that is the reason why . He is a Troll and has a very vile tongue
 
2

20100221

Hey Dude,

you used a Comcast IP address: 69.181.247.106 and this can't be that guy
you love to hate based in United Kingdom. He is a decendent of your colonial
masters. Remember that?

hth


<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->

OrgName: Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc
OrgID: CCCH-3
Address: 1800 Bishops Gate Blvd
City: Mt Laurel
StateProv: NJ
PostalCode: 08054
Country: US

NetRange: 69.180.0.0 - 69.181.255.255
CIDR: 69.180.0.0/15
NetName: CCCH3-33
NetHandle: NET-69-180-0-0-1
Parent: NET-69-0-0-0-0
NetType: Direct Allocation
NameServer: DNS101.COMCAST.NET
NameServer: DNS102.COMCAST.NET
NameServer: DNS103.COMCAST.NET
NameServer: DNS104.COMCAST.NET
NameServer: DNS105.COMCAST.NET
Comment:
RegDate: 2004-02-18
Updated: 2010-02-01

OrgAbuseHandle: NAPO-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Network Abuse and Policy Observance
OrgAbusePhone: +1-856-317-7272
OrgAbuseEmail: (e-mail address removed)

OrgTechHandle: IC161-ARIN
OrgTechName: Comcast Cable Communications Inc
OrgTechPhone: +1-856-317-7200
OrgTechEmail: (e-mail address removed)
CustName: Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc
Address: 1800 Bishops Gate Blvd
City: Mt Laurel
StateProv: NJ
PostalCode: 08054
Country: US
RegDate: 2006-04-20
Updated: 2006-04-20

NetRange: 69.181.0.0 - 69.181.255.255
CIDR: 69.181.0.0/16
NetName: SFBA-20
NetHandle: NET-69-181-0-0-1
Parent: NET-69-180-0-0-1
NetType: Reassigned
Comment:
RegDate: 2006-04-20
Updated: 2006-04-20

OrgAbuseHandle: NAPO-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Network Abuse and Policy Observance
OrgAbusePhone: +1-856-317-7272
OrgAbuseEmail: (e-mail address removed)

OrgTechHandle: IC161-ARIN
OrgTechName: Comcast Cable Communications Inc
OrgTechPhone: +1-856-317-7200
OrgTechEmail: (e-mail address removed)

# ARIN WHOIS database, last updated 2010-02-20 20:00
# Enter ? for additional hints on searching ARIN's WHOIS database.
#
# ARIN WHOIS data and services are subject to the Terms of Use
# available at https://www.arin.net/whois_tou.html

<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
 
2

20100221

Peter said:
He is not new at all but keeps he changing his name. He is usually deleted off the
server and that is the reason why . He is a Troll and has a very vile tongue

I'll deal with you and your sister later. She has been not behaving
properly lately especially when I am paying a huge sum for her body!!

Can I use your wife instead? Is she any good?
 
L

Leythos

20100221 said:
Ignore what others have said. I have successfully installed DELL branded OS
on a self built computer and it installed and also activated it online.

What a person CAN do and what is legit are often two different things.

Pirating software, as you describe above, is unethical and dishonest,
something that selfish and immature types do and advocate.

Dell branded OS's are OEM licensed for installation ONLY on the system
the media was provided with. If you are installing it on a NON-DELL
computer then you're clearly violating the licensing agreement and an
unethical person.
 
L

Leythos

20100221 said:
Second: I am not spouting any ignorant rubbish. all my writings have been
through experience and practical demonstration on my some 1000 PCs at my
university.

And yet your experience and postings show that you are not following the
licensing requirements and are a very unethical person.
 
L

Leythos

20100221 said:
You will be surprised to learn that HP and DELL DON'T sell white boxes with
no operating system. All our boxes have serial numbers affixed on them.

You're wrong, you can purchase Dell computers as well as Dell servers
without any OS included, do it all the time for customers that already
have Volume Licenses.
 
2

20100221

What a person CAN do and what is legit are often two different things.

I am completely in agreement with you on this.

Pirating software, as you describe above, is unethical and dishonest,
something that selfish and immature types do and advocate.

Who decides what is pirating? Is it not the courts? Unethical and
dishonest by which religion and by whose standards are you talking
about? The other day I went to the zoo and a little monkey came and
took bananas from my hand. Do you consider this to be unethical?
Dell branded OS's are OEM licensed for installation ONLY on the system
the media was provided with. If you are installing it on a NON-DELL
computer then you're clearly violating the licensing agreement and an
unethical person.

Again who decides what is ethical and what is not. M$ was recently
found at court of law to have violated Canadian company's copyright of
XML features in its flagship product - WORD. Is this considered
unethical? That company nearly went burst until this court case. M$
has been asked to pull out from Word product unless it removes XML
features from it. They (M$) have appealed on the grounds that Customers
won't have any products to use and surprisingly the judge agreed. We
shall see what happens.
 
2

20100221

And yet your experience and postings show that you are not following the
licensing requirements and are a very unethical person.

Please provide an objective reference that defines who is an "unethical
person or stop using this term here. We are not religious bigots to
take us back to 17th century.!
 
2

20100221

You're wrong, you can purchase Dell computers as well as Dell servers
without any OS included, do it all the time for customers that already
have Volume Licenses.

You may be doing it in your country but in UK (United Kingdom) this is a
complete NO NO as far as DELL-UK and HP-UK are concerned.
 
2

20100221

20100221 said:
Again who decides what is ethical and what is not. M$ was recently
found at court of law to have violated Canadian company's copyright of
XML features in its flagship product - WORD. Is this considered
unethical? That company nearly went burst until this court case. M$
has been asked to pull out from Word product unless it removes XML
features from it. They (M$) have appealed on the grounds that Customers
won't have any products to use and surprisingly the judge agreed. We
shall see what happens.


Reference for the above, if at all one is needed, is here:

<http://blog.seattlepi.com/microsoft/archives/176223.asp>

hth
 
U

Unknown

ANONYMOUS, that is a typical response from someone with a vile tongue.
We in the U.S. thought the UK had outstanding colleges such as Eton.
I guess we were misled. Who are you tring to impress?
 
S

Shenan Stanley

20100221 said:
You may be doing it in your country but in UK (United Kingdom) this
is a complete NO NO as far as DELL-UK and HP-UK are concerned.

Could choose Linux/FreeDOS though.

May not be 'no os', but it allows you to choose what you want and not pay
for the WIndows OS if you don't want o.
 
U

Unknown

Yes ANONYMOUS changed to numbers.
The number changes each day. The numbers are Year (2010) Month (02) Day
(21)---for today
They may have taught him that in college.
 
2

20100221

Could choose Linux/FreeDOS though.

May not be 'no os', but it allows you to choose what you want and not pay
for the WIndows OS if you don't want o.

You don't understand dude. We have no objection to pay over the odds
because our funds don't have to be earned.

I wasn't complaining about paying either.

Grow up baby!!!
 
2

20100221

Unknown said:
Yes ANONYMOUS changed to numbers.
The number changes each day. The numbers are Year (2010) Month (02) Day
(21)---for today
They may have taught him that in college.

Now how did an idiot like you work this out? Math must be getting
simpler by the day!!
 
S

Shenan Stanley

20100221 said:
You don't understand dude. We have no objection to pay over the
odds because our funds don't have to be earned.

I wasn't complaining about paying either.

Grow up baby!!!

I have no clue what slang you are trying to convey.

I didn't say you minded paying - I was telling you what you could do about
the OS.

You said, "You will be surprised to learn that HP and DELL
DON'T sell white boxes with no operating system. All our
boxes have serial numbers affixed on them. "

And since you gave no reference at that point to who "our" was, you were
incorrect to the world at large.
 
2

20100221

Shenan said:
And since you gave no reference at that point to who "our" was, you were
incorrect to the world at large.

"our" refers to University. We buy all our hardware and software thru
the Senate of the University of London. I thought this was implied in
the sentence.

The Senate manages to get finance and sponsorships from large
corporations of which Microsoft is one, DELL and HP are others. Camelot
helps us with refurbishing and furniture for the labs. That is why I
was saying we don't have to earn to buy state of the art technology.
Paying is not a problem for us. Also, the question of Piracy, Moral and
whether one is ethical or not also does not come into the equation.
Leythos was wrong when he brought this here without knowing the full
facts.

OK time to close up for today!! Nearly midnight here in London, UK.
 
L

Leythos

20100221 said:
I am completely in agreement with you on this.



Who decides what is pirating? Is it not the courts? Unethical and
dishonest by which religion and by whose standards are you talking
about? The other day I went to the zoo and a little monkey came and
took bananas from my hand. Do you consider this to be unethical?


Again who decides what is ethical and what is not. M$ was recently
found at court of law to have violated Canadian company's copyright of
XML features in its flagship product - WORD. Is this considered
unethical? That company nearly went burst until this court case. M$
has been asked to pull out from Word product unless it removes XML
features from it. They (M$) have appealed on the grounds that Customers
won't have any products to use and surprisingly the judge agreed. We
shall see what happens.

It appears all you have is your attempt to diver attention from your
piracy as defined by the licensing agreement, but it's not going to
work.

Piracy is unethical.
 
L

Leythos

20100221 said:
Please provide an objective reference that defines who is an "unethical
person or stop using this term here. We are not religious bigots to
take us back to 17th century.!

Your comments indicate your lack of ethics, look up the definition if
you don't understand the meaning.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Top