XP for the office

  • Thread starter Thread starter Guest
  • Start date Start date
G

Guest

I wonder when Microsoft is going to produce an operating system for Business. XP has to many distractions installed that require removal before it can be deployed in an office setting. Some of it is extremely difficult to remove or disable ... PLUS I shouldn't have to ... they should all not exist or be an optional install. XP great for home users .. a pain for the office.
 
spazzy said:
I wonder when Microsoft is going to produce an operating system for
Business. XP has to many distractions installed that require removal before
it can be deployed in an office setting. Some of it is extremely difficult
to remove or disable ... PLUS I shouldn't have to ... they should all not
exist or be an optional install. XP great for home users .. a pain for the
office.

Spazzy,

We have a huge number of Windows XP Deployments done for offices - I am
currently deploying another 6000 seats (as well as Server 2003, Exchange
2003, SMS 2003 and MOM).
You can change the UI back to Windows 2000 Classic mode, if your issues are
either the UI look and feel.
As regards "distractions " - pretty much every aspect of the Windows XP
desktop experience can be tailored and controlled via group policy as well
as the actual customization of deployment.
Did you look at and understand the power of GPOs and have you built you own
customized install ?

--
Regards,

Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights

Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups

spazzy said:
I wonder when Microsoft is going to produce an operating system for
Business. XP has to many distractions installed that require removal before
it can be deployed in an office setting. Some of it is extremely difficult
to remove or disable ... PLUS I shouldn't have to ... they should all not
exist or be an optional install. XP great for home users .. a pain for the
office.
 
Mike said:
Business. XP has to many distractions installed that require removal before
it can be deployed in an office setting. Some of it is extremely difficult
to remove or disable ... PLUS I shouldn't have to ... they should all not
exist or be an optional install. XP great for home users .. a pain for the
office.

Spazzy,

We have a huge number of Windows XP Deployments done for offices - I am
currently deploying another 6000 seats (as well as Server 2003, Exchange
2003, SMS 2003 and MOM).
You can change the UI back to Windows 2000 Classic mode, if your issues are
either the UI look and feel.
As regards "distractions " - pretty much every aspect of the Windows XP
desktop experience can be tailored and controlled via group policy as well
as the actual customization of deployment.
Did you look at and understand the power of GPOs and have you built you own
customized install ?
Why can't we just have a secure platform to run programs on, instead of
a "Windows XP desktop experience". I have a default install of xp and
an installation of office which comes to over 3gig of hard disk space used.

Kev
 
Kevin Ratcliffe said:
Why can't we just have a secure platform to run programs on, instead of
a "Windows XP desktop experience". I have a default install of xp and
an installation of office which comes to over 3gig of hard disk space used.

Kev

Kevin,

You have hit the nail on the head directly - as you said "...I have a
default install of xp and an installation of office which comes to over
3gig... " - no one in the corporate arena uses a default install. You
always customize it to meet there specific requirements for security,
functionality and manageability/control of the environment. This is why the
setup process is so configurable and controllable.
You can have pretty much whatever you want on a Windows XP deployment and
Windows XP SP1a plus the latest fixes or SP2 is an extremely secure
platform.
BUT
Remember the best strategy is defence in depth, so you can layer protection
and security around your machine and into your environment, add to that
proper training and education and you can achieve great levels of security
and control.

Did my corporate customers get hit by Nachi, Welchia, Blaster Sobig, MyDoom
or Swen - No. Do my users receive SPAM e-mails or e-mail with unauthorized
attachments - No. Are they educated to not use their corporate e-mail
addresses in public or to open an attachment from an unknown source - of
course. Is access to the Internet controlled and certain sites blocked -
Yes. Is the desktop completely managed and controlled - Yes. Is there a
proper patch management solution and technology to ensure all systems are up
to date - absolutely.
Can a dead desktop be swapped out and a bare metal machine redeployed and
all the users settings and applications recovered to it in a short space of
time - yes.

All this and more done using Windows XP and the Microsoft Server System,
delivering secure, stable, managed and functionally rich desktop and server
experiences.
--
Regards,

Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights

Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups
 
Mike said:
Kevin,

You have hit the nail on the head directly - as you said "...I have a
default install of xp and an installation of office which comes to over
3gig... " - no one in the corporate arena uses a default install. You
always customize it to meet there specific requirements for security,
functionality and manageability/control of the environment. This is why the
setup process is so configurable and controllable.
I believe that is very much a matter of opinion!
You can have pretty much whatever you want on a Windows XP deployment and
Windows XP SP1a plus the latest fixes or SP2 is an extremely secure
platform.
Are there any instructions on the web, where I can find out how to do a
'bare bones' install? I think that a default install should be a bare
bones install. Not the other way round, where a default install is
everything and then we need to start removing unwanted stuff. Anybody
with the gumption to install an OS, should also be trusted and able to
decide what extras they need. People should be allowed to decide what
they need, not what they don't need.
BUT
Remember the best strategy is defence in depth, so you can layer protection
and security around your machine and into your environment, add to that
proper training and education and you can achieve great levels of security
and control.
I agree!
Did my corporate customers get hit by Nachi, Welchia, Blaster Sobig, MyDoom
or Swen - No. Do my users receive SPAM e-mails or e-mail with unauthorized
attachments - No.
No sysadmin in their right mind would allow executable attachments in
emails.
Are they educated to not use their corporate e-mail
addresses in public or to open an attachment from an unknown source - of
course.
Tell that to 1500 students aged 16-18.
Is access to the Internet controlled and certain sites blocked -
Yes. Is the desktop completely managed and controlled - Yes. Is there a
proper patch management solution and technology to ensure all systems are up
to date - absolutely.
I suppose thats easy when you have massive resources. What about us, 2
tech support people trying to manage 4 netware servers, 3 unix boxes,
about 50 printers, 2 Win2000 servers. Believe me, it aint easy. In
fact it's impossible to do all tasks well. On top of that I've been
told to install a giant piece of bloatware called Windows XP.
Can a dead desktop be swapped out and a bare metal machine redeployed and
all the users settings and applications recovered to it in a short space of
time - yes.
As long as all the hardware is the same, you can do that with Norton Ghost
All this and more done using Windows XP and the Microsoft Server System,
delivering secure, stable, managed and functionally rich desktop and server
experiences.
</doctrine>

Please, just deliver us a platform!

Kev
 
Kevin,

Full documentation on how to do customized installs using the appropriate
answer files and tools is available on the Windows XP CD ROM in the
Deploy.cab file as well as numerous articles on TechNet (available online
at - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/default.mspx one link that may be of
value is
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/deploy/default.mspx
Don't forget to see and read all the additional resources listed at the
bottom section of that page.
See also
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/desktop/default.asp
Again massive amounts of information on deployment planning and
implementation of Windows XP in your environment

If you're still unable to produce a fully customized build for your
environment then you may wish to take expert advice and consultancy from one
of our certified partners.
In the UK these can be located via -
http://www.microsoft.com/uk/experts/default.mspx


As regards a couple of your other comments

- you can still do the desktop swap out without third party products and
with dissimilar hardware (again all just base functionality in Windows XP
and the Windows Server System)

Not doctrine - actually real world usage and deployment experience for
clients.

Finally, Windows XP is a complete desktop platform and irrespective of us
shipping it to install by default a more feature rich experience or not, you
would still be required to use the tools, technology and information
(mentioned above) to produce a "standard" build that meets your
requirements. So the starting point is irrelevant as you never perform an
install and then try and configure - you build your install to closely match
your requirements and then if needs be, configure it and implement
additional levels of security through technologies such as Group Policy via
Active Directory etc.

--
Regards,

Mike
--
Mike Brannigan [Microsoft]

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights

Please note I cannot respond to e-mailed questions, please use these
newsgroups
 
Mike said:
Kevin,

Full documentation on how to do customized installs using the appropriate
answer files and tools is available on the Windows XP CD ROM in the
Deploy.cab file as well as numerous articles on TechNet (available online
at - http://www.microsoft.com/technet/default.mspx one link that may be of
value is
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/winxppro/deploy/default.mspx
Don't forget to see and read all the additional resources listed at the
bottom section of that page.
See also
http://www.microsoft.com/resources/desktop/default.asp
Again massive amounts of information on deployment planning and
implementation of Windows XP in your environment

If you're still unable to produce a fully customized build for your
environment then you may wish to take expert advice and consultancy from one
of our certified partners.
In the UK these can be located via -
http://www.microsoft.com/uk/experts/default.mspx Thanks for the links.


As regards a couple of your other comments

- you can still do the desktop swap out without third party products and
with dissimilar hardware (again all just base functionality in Windows XP
and the Windows Server System)

Not doctrine - actually real world usage and deployment experience for
clients.
But you've got to admit that it did sound like and advertisment.
Finally, Windows XP is a complete desktop platform and irrespective of us
shipping it to install by default a more feature rich experience or not, you
would still be required to use the tools, technology and information
(mentioned above) to produce a "standard" build that meets your
requirements. So the starting point is irrelevant as you never perform an
install and then try and configure - you build your install to closely match
your requirements and then if needs be, configure it and implement
additional levels of security through technologies such as Group Policy via
Active Directory etc.
It really does sound like a lot of work, just to get a desktop to run
office apps though!

When this thread started, it was a plea, albeit not by myself, but one
which I can empathise with for a 'feature-less' platform to run office apps.

This is probably not the group to debate this but, I wonder how long IT
managers are going to put up with having to constantly upgrade client
PCs to keep up with bloatware. I think they stick with Microsoft
primarily because of compatibility issues and fear of using unknown
software. OpenOffice is good and runs on lots of platforms. Like I
said earlier in the thread, I use it on an ancient FreeBSD box with a 1
gig hard disk. But I'm sure that Microsoft will keep 'changing the
goalposts' so that no rival office package can offer true compatibility.
I don't have a real problem with that unless Microsoft actually
listen to people like myself and Spazzy who started the thread. Give us
what we want, not what Microsoft and their marketing people think we
need. Microsoft already sell XP Home, XP Pro, Media Center. Why not
a XP Barebones. I have already put in a suggestion on the MS website,
but I'm sure that it will fall on deaf ears, because MS always seem to
decide what we need. Like the integration of Internet Explorer into
Windows. A simple analogy of this is would be to buy a house at
£100,000 but the builders installed a £40,000 shower. But I don't want
a £40,000 shower. I can get one of those for £100 at the local DIY
shop. I ask the builder, can I remove the £40,000 shower and buy the
house for £60,000? He says "No, it's a load bearing shower. We now
must have internet explorer installed. It's not my browser of choice
but it's got to be there. Hence, Windows is now so full of stuff that
you can't remove without breaking something else that we probably have
to have it. Sorry this is turning into a rant. . .Blah . . . .blah . .
.. . .blah . . . .
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Similar Threads


Back
Top