why the acf faq CANNOT work for the acf webring (or any similiar webring)

[jason]

Remember that "negative publicity is good publicity." A small moth
that could otherwise just die off on its own, might become fed and
vitalized * -- due to its mention on the P page.

Exactly. Just ignore the webring and stop responding to Rtdos's posts.
He'll eventually get tired of the game.

My vote is to ignore Rtdos's posts and let the issue die a natural death.

 

[Susan Bugher]

Could someone also suggest the proper wording for a disclaimer?

Below is the latest count based on the posts I have seen - please post
any revisions that are needed.

---------
----------

Pro:

Bobby <[email protected]>
Blinky the Shark <[email protected]>
Tiger <[email protected]>
Owen <[email protected]>
(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
(e-mail address removed)
"Jack D. Russell, Sr." <"jackru$$ell2"@notmail.com>

Con:
»Q« <[email protected]>
Dewey Edwards <[email protected]>
Aaron <[email protected]>
omega <[email protected]>
jason <[email protected]>
John Fitzsimons <[email protected]>

--------

Susan
--
Pricelessware: http:www.pricelessware.org
PL2003: http://www.pricelessware.org/2003/about2003PL.htm
PL2004 Review: http://www.pricelessware.org/2004/2004nominationsPL.php
alt.comp.freeware FAQ (short) - maintained by John F.
http://clients.net2000.com.au/~johnf/faq.html