doneirik skrev:
As I was trying to convince afriend of mine to use more freeware
instead of e.g. microsoftproducts he asked me "why freeware??
Uhm, duh! I'd start by turning the question around to "Why pay?" But of
course, if your friend is so full of dosh I do believe that a lot of
freeware authors are open to donations.
there
must be a big "but" hidden somewhere since its for free...(...)
Well, sure. It's usually harder to find commercial support. That is, it
is harder to pay someone you can sue in case something breaks. This is
really important to some corporations, especially in the states.
Personally, I couldn't give a crap.
And sometimes quality software costs money. But then again a lot of
really crappy software also costs money. And there's a lot of crappy
free software, but there are some true gems as well. Some free software
even outclasses and outperforms commercial counterparts, which should
make the choice a no-brainer. Apparently, it does not.
...and
what about all those viruses....???"
Which ones? I have _never_ gotten a virus from downloading and
installing a piece of free software. There are some "free" programs that
comes bundled with additional programs with varying degrees of
malevolence, but these can be spotted and avoided with a little
research. And in the case of open source software, I estimate the
chances of getting infected from OSS considerably smaller than the
chance of getting infected from something you pick up in a sealed box
from any software retailer.
Actually I couldnt give him adefinite answer... I know there are lots
of different freeware butfor different reasons, but...
There is no definite answer. The bottom line is: Know what you need, and
know which alternatives may or may not suit your needs. If the best
piece of software for a given job has a big zero on the pricetag, the
choice is simple. If you have something commercial in sight, and there
are no available free substitutes, the choice is also simple. After
that, it's all cost and effect.