When you Upgrade to vista, You Degrade your prossessing power!

[non flammable]

When you Upgrade to vista, You Degrade your processing power.

More of the CPU cycles are used for the OS itself... how much more?

50% more! The hard drive thrashes more, the ram is full and not free for the
applications,
and the pipelines are full of traffic that vista itself generates...

I am currently running a triple boot with XP, Vista and Ubuntu...

The only OS that bogs down the system to a point where its irritating (for
doing multitasking not simple stuff) is Vista...

ubuntu leaves your system without unnecessary stuff running and thrashing
disks!
XP if tweaked a bit becomes a lean mean processing machine!

So if you have a single core, say 3 GHz, and you upgrade to vista,
it will me like you have a 1.5 GHz computer...

If you get a new 4 core CPU its like you only got a 2 core one...

So basically an upgrade to vista means a degrade in your hardware
performance!

And not to mention that vista often freezes all the computer with its buggy
and unstable
hidden processes, like the dreaded "trustedinstaller". How many times have
you seen slow copy,
or frozen windows explorers? Its crap!

When you see something calling for trust.. well then DON'T trust it! lol

 

[Jane C]

And a Happy New Year to you too

--
Jane, not plain 64 bit enabled
Batteries not included. Braincell on vacation ;-)
MVP Windows Shell/User

anyway.....

 

[Slap]

When you Upgrade to vista, You Degrade your processing power.

You sure are messed up. I guess there are worse folks out there tho.
--

 

[Peter Foldes]

What on earth are you rumbling about. You are completely off kilter

 

[Kerry Brown]

When you Upgrade to vista, You Degrade your processing power.

More of the CPU cycles are used for the OS itself... how much more?

50% more! The hard drive thrashes more, the ram is full and not free for
the applications,
and the pipelines are full of traffic that vista itself generates...

Do you have some benchmarks that prove this or are you guessing?

 

[Cameron Snyder]

I have found the multitasking of Vista and its responsiveness in the
servicing of devices to be one of the bright spots in my upgrade from XP. I
don't know why more don't rave about it. It is so glaringly apparent to me
as an improvement.

Yesterday, rendering a 5GB video file with CPU at 100% I was able to open
Internet explorer, surf, perform maintenance on my PC with only minor
slowdown apparent. Doing the same tasks in XP would have had me waiting for
30 seconds for a window to open or an application to load. Mouse clicks
would go unrecognized. Vista is just so much better at tasking and it has
more tasks going on.

I have never seen what you asked and I am on a 2004 HP media center machine,
with AMD 64 mono-core processor; USB everything--scanner,printer, wrls KBD,
& mouse, webcam, IR blaster, remote control. I am dictating this with the
fantastic voice recognition with CPU hovering between 2 and 24% as I speak.

I had two problems with the upgrade. Webcam no longer worked in powered
hub, but had to be plugged into the USB port directly, and FM radio isn't
currently possible using over the air digital TV on my tuner card for some
unknown reason. It did work in XP media center. I'm certain these are
hardware/driver installation issues, not wholly Vista.

On the whole I love Vista. It must suck being you.

 

[Frank]

non flammable wrote:

....just the usual bs lies.
Hey capin crunch...how's that cardboard space ship coming along?
Ready for liftoff yet...hahaha...LOL!
You're an idiot!
Get a life you moron loser.
Frank

 

[non flammable on Ubuntu 7.10]

How much ram do you have, are you using vista 32 or 64 bit?

I suspect that you are trying to lie to us..

even on dual core machines Vista is too slow for my taste.

 

[Frank]

How much ram do you have, are you using vista 32 or 64 bit?

I suspect that you are trying to lie to us..

even on dual core machines Vista is too slow for my taste.

You need to get two etch-a-sketches.
Frank

 

[non flammable on XP]

Whats the problem Frank? Still drawing in the sand with a stick. Your idea
of formating is to mix up the sand again with your foot!

 

[Ronnie Vernon MVP]

It sounds like you have no idea what you're talking about.

 

[Ronnie Vernon MVP]

He likely need to go look that word up in the dictionary.

 

[Frank]

non flammable on XP wrote:


....stuff only an idiot would write.
Loser.
Frank

 

[Drew]

My God you frickin moron !! Did your mother have any kids that lived ???
Are you always this stupid or do you just work at it all day in between
bangin de drum ???...You post so much bull**it it is unbelievable..!!

 

[Drew]

Dammit ! get lost you moron !! No one here has time to listen to a PROVEN
loser like you !!! You post such fallacies it is not even a laugh anymore !!

 

[Drew]

The sad part is once he has been embarrassed enough under this name he will
just come up with another moronic handle....This stupid pansy couldn't run a
real computer if he took 20yrs of free lessons..!!

 

[zachd [MSFT]]

You should list actual perf measurements / methodology. Isn't that where it
gets interesting, anyways? Specific and exact criticism seems to be much
more interesting/relevant.

I believe TrustedInstaller issues should generally be
mitigated/significantly improved in SP1 - I believe you can theoretically
access RC1 right now if you're feeling bold... ? Plus, hey, that way you
can keep your criticisms fresh/current. =)

 

[non flammable on Vista]

loser like you !!!

Hey Blabber mouth, it must really suck being you...

 

[Drew]

Are you always this stupid ??

Hey Blabber mouth, it must really suck being you...

 

[non flammable on XP]

I dont want to install a Beta service pack on a beta quality OS...