viewers very slow in large subdirectories

  • Thread starter Thread starter Howard Sartori
  • Start date Start date
H

Howard Sartori

In a subdirectory with many (7000) mixed .jpg/.gif/.bmp/.doc/.txt files,
Microsoft Picture and Fax Viewer and Microsoft Photo Editor are extremely
slow (30 seconds) to display the graphic/picture. (The application comes up
fast enough). Paint very, very fast.
Environment is WinXP Pro SP1a, 2.8GHz CPU, 1GByte RAM, 120MB SATA HD,
Any ideas why these products are so slow?
Thanks. /Howard
 
caus you have a ton of files in ONE folder...separate them....organize by
whatever...date, type, name....come on...use your MELON.....
 
The Microsoft Picture and Fax Viewer IS slow. That's why I removed it and
replaced it with ACDSee for my default quick image viewer. If you don't
want to replace your image viewer, you might improve performance by limiting
the number of images in your subfolders, and create more subfolders to store
the excess images.
 
Thanks for the help. The ADCSee will work well. Problem is that this is
the Eudora mail folder and though I clean it out routinely it is big do to a
lot of message traffic .. Thanks. /Howard
t.cruise said:
The Microsoft Picture and Fax Viewer IS slow. That's why I removed it and
replaced it with ACDSee for my default quick image viewer. If you don't
want to replace your image viewer, you might improve performance by limiting
the number of images in your subfolders, and create more subfolders to store
the excess images.
--

T.C.
t__cruise@[NoSpam]hotmail.com
Remove [NoSpam] to reply


Howard Sartori said:
In a subdirectory with many (7000) mixed .jpg/.gif/.bmp/.doc/.txt files,
Microsoft Picture and Fax Viewer and Microsoft Photo Editor are extremely
slow (30 seconds) to display the graphic/picture. (The application
comes
up
fast enough). Paint very, very fast.
Environment is WinXP Pro SP1a, 2.8GHz CPU, 1GByte RAM, 120MB SATA HD,
Any ideas why these products are so slow?
Thanks. /Howard
 
t.cruise said:
The Microsoft Picture and Fax Viewer IS slow. That's why I removed it and
replaced it with ACDSee for my default quick image viewer.


Or I suggest the free IrfanView from www.irfanview.com, an excellent
program, I used to use ACDSee but have not actually loaded it for ages
now
 
then do this "cleaning" even more often...if you rationalize your
inability....you will succeed at hardly anything...
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Back
Top