Per Craig Coope:
I'd just like to add that I'd never use a PC with intergrated graphics
to do any graphic intensive tasks. I'm not saying that it won't work
but for me, intergrated chips are only good for running Windows and
the basic (non graphic strenuous) apps around it.
This is an Asus 901 - basically my "Walking-Around" PC that I
bought for troubleshooting network problems and mapping WiFi
coverage.
However, I've found it tb a nice little home entertainment device
for watching TV recordings and movies from .ISO files via a
freebie called "VLC Media Player" - over WiFI.
Only problem is that it chokes easily on too much definition. The
TV server that I use to feed it dynamically transcodes, so it's
not a show-stopper (so to speak....) but being able to do native
HD would be a nicety.
Just ordered a 2-gig card from Crucial that will replace the one
in the PC and double the memory. For thirty bucks, it seemed
like a no-brainer.
Once I get it installed, I'll take your advice and start playing
around with the allocation between CPU and integrated graphics
card and see what comes of it.
Thanks for the pointers.