UPGRADE OR FULL VERSION

[Tom]

I will take this chance to state the obvious, and I believe that the only
reason you might relinquish the final word in this post -- if in fact you
do
so -- is to try to save some face. Just for the record, this is the
second
time you've "offered" me the final word (which is completely illogical,
but
I don't expect you to understand that). You have *taken* it on countless
occasions. It is clearly your foremost objective, and anyone who is
wondering if that's true should just run a query on your nick.



Time and time again -- and this is shown by the written record here;
anyone
can go and check - you have shown that your ultimate goal is not to help
people, nor to participate in rational discussion, but to espouse your own
ideas and shoot down anyone you see as opposing you, regardless of how
correct they invariably are, and how astonishingly mistaken you are. You
fabricate foundations for these absurd arguments seemingly out of thin
air.
Such prestidigitation is not well suited to a forum ostensibly devoted to
the advancement of knowledge; you serve only to bring the participants
down
to your level. I am as guilty of this as any, and I take full
responsibility for my actions. My only defense is that, being
considerably
more intelligent than you, I feel some deep-seeded need to speak out
against
the blatant, glaring inaccuracies you consistently introduce into this
forum. I have a great deal of trouble leaving stupidity alone, especially
your particular brand of it, which seems to generate some depraved form of
loyalty in those of similarly deficient mind. I hate to see this inanity
breed; you are a breeder and nothing else.



The tactics you employ to ensure the survival of this inanity are so
unrefined, so transparently obvious, that it pains me even to read them.
You don't listen to those with opposing viewpoints; you don't pay
attention
to debate. You close your eyes, you close your mind, and then you call
people names. *You call them names!* The absurdity of this is obviously
lost on you - as it is lost on all teenagers who call their schoolmates
names - but to those of us with I.Q's higher than 60, this is so patently
ridiculous as to warrant some concern on our part. You have all the
intelligence of a sea anemone, Kurt, and Darwinism suggests that someday
soon, someone of superior intellect (most anyone) is going to come along
and
remove you from the food chain. We're concerned, my boy. We're concerned
for your well-being.



So: You call them names, you insult them, and when they respond to your
insults, you insult them some more for having stooped to your level (a
level
on which, I might add, you have already very clearly established
yourself).
You are a one-trick pony, Kurt. You don't know what you're talking about
when it comes to copyright law, your computer skills are clearly lacking,
and as for pure human interaction, I've seen blind, rabid, lame dogs in
heat
with better people skills. I tell you this not because I think you're an
imbecile (though, clearly, you are), but because if you want to hold out
hope of ever getting your point across - about anything - you should
really
start working on your communication skills. I shouldn't even need to
mention that the most ubiquitous proclamation in all your quasi-arguments
is
"LOL," but it just goes to further my point. You can't formulate a
rational
thought to save your life, and so you just go with the least common
denominator, namely, a hackneyed internet abbreviation, rampant verbal
abuse, lame-duck opinions, and microscopic genitalia. Whoops! Did I say
that?



Let me summarize. You know nothing about any of the topics on which you
post; your posts consist almost entirely of name-calling and fabricated,
delusional arguments; you preface each one of those posts with "LOL"; and
all of your posts are so twisted, irrational, and incoherent as to warrant
psychiatric evaluation. What are you *doing* here, Kurt? Shouldn't you
be
in a bayou somewhere, strumming a banjo and waiting for your sister to get
home? I think there's a sow out back that needs your attention.



I know this post will probably get edited out, and that's fine. I only
hope
you get to it before Mike does, because it will be the last time you'll
hear
from me - I'm finally going to filter you out of my life. For a while I
found your posts sort of entertaining in a sick, masochistic way - I
almost
enjoyed discovering that your idiocy and your depravity plumbed deeper
depths than I previously imagined even existed. Now, however, I've grown
sick of your rants, your rambling, and your rampant bestiality. Notice,
though, that I've managed to lay bare the cold, hard truth about you in
this
post without ever having uttered a curse word. As they say, profanity is
the result of a deficient mind attempting to express itself forcefully,
and
your mind is about as deficient as they come.



Enjoy the sheep!

LOL, you need to purchase a new faux phallic device, you're taking it too
hard, and cannot own up to your own deficiencies in undserstanding what the
differences are in what a real argument entails, as to people just acting
like sheep!

 

[Jupiter Jones [MVP]]

"Where did I say anything about attempting..."
I never said you did, that is your spin on what I wrote.

I was summarizing my understanding of the changes.
You may have known that if you read all what I wrote instead of skipping the
last part.
But then that is your right.

 

[Linda B]

Thank you for:

1) Starting with LOL. You're an idiot too, that's good to see, and it's
good to see you proving my points for me.
2) Not making any sense. Remember what I said about illogical ramblings?
Case in point. You, too, need to improve your communication skills.
3) The vibrator suggestion. Already taken care of, thanks for taking an
interest.

 

[Tom]

Thank you for:

1) Starting with LOL. You're an idiot too, that's good to see, and it's
good to see you proving my points for me.

You mean you are an idiot also, since you said "too"

2) Not making any sense. Remember what I said about illogical ramblings?

Not my problem that you cannot make sense of common English, but I know
you'll use the personal "illogical ramblings" defense, to make yourself feel
better.

Case in point. You, too, need to improve your communication skills.

No, it is your reading skills, my post was spot on inline with what you said
to kurt.

3) The vibrator suggestion. Already taken care of, thanks for taking an
interest.

And you'll eliminate going through them so quickly, if you would take care
of that crusty yellowish discharge, that also is the cause of the makeup of
your persona!

 

[Linda B]

<yawn>

--
LB

You mean you are an idiot also, since you said "too"
ramblings?

Not my problem that you cannot make sense of common English, but I know
you'll use the personal "illogical ramblings" defense, to make yourself feel

No, it is your reading skills, my post was spot on inline with what you said
to kurt.

And you'll eliminate going through them so quickly, if you would take care
of that crusty yellowish discharge, that also is the cause of the makeup of
your persona!

 

[Lurker]

I will take this chance to state the obvious,

If it is so obvious, is it rational to have a need state it?

and I believe that the only
reason you might relinquish the final word in this post -- if in fact you do
so -- is to try to save some face.

It would seem to me that he was setting you up to have you demonstrate
that getting the last word is more important to you than it is to him.

Just for the record, this is the second
time you've "offered" me the final word (which is completely illogical, but
I don't expect you to understand that).

How is it illogical? He offered not to reply to you, to give you the
last word, "if it is so important to you." It is evident that the
last word means more to you, than it does to him.

You have *taken* it on countless
occasions.

Now that is illogical. How would he know, in advance, that any of his
posts would not be replied to, in order to "take" the last word?

It is clearly your foremost objective, and anyone who is
wondering if that's true should just run a query on your nick.

And the appearance here is that the last word is more important to
you.

Time and time again -- and this is shown by the written record here; anyone
can go and check - you have shown that your ultimate goal is not to help
people,

Definitely untrue. He has helped me with a problem, and as a regular
lurker here, I've read many posts of his that have helped others.

nor to participate in rational discussion,

Untrue. Most of his philosophical agreements about Microsoft
Licensing are totally based in the rational and the real. Most of his
opponents are that base their opinions on irrational beliefs, because
they tend to call anyone, that doesn't follow Microsoft's licence
according to what those opposing Kurt believe it means, is a thief or
a pirate, which is outside the realm of reason, and has never been
proven, just like he says to them all the time.

but to espouse your own
ideas and shoot down anyone you see as opposing you,

You do know that is what any person that hold strong rational opinions
would do, don't you?

regardless of how
correct they invariably are,

That is subjective. For my part, I see that it is Kurt that is the
one that is "invariably" correct. He explains what is the reality of
the licensing situation. Just look at this thread. He was the one
that posted the System Builders License, while his opponent just
alluded to it, and made it sound like it said something it definitely
does not say.

and how astonishingly mistaken you are.

How astonishingly taken with him you are! All you are doing is
stating that he is wrong, but you have yet to show one example of it.
At least he goes out of his way to explain himself and his opinions.

You
fabricate foundations for these absurd arguments seemingly out of thin air.

Actually, he did not start this one. In this thread he corrected the
fabrication foundations of other posters.

Such prestidigitation is not well suited to a forum ostensibly devoted to
the advancement of knowledge; you serve only to bring the participants down
to your level.

What he actually does is pushes the buttons of those that oppose him.
He did it with you. "Last word is yours, if it is so important to
you." What he did was goad you into displaying that the last word was
more important to you than to him.

He goads Leythos all the time, by demonstrating that all he does is
present disinformation, and then by adding a couple of comments that
is sure to get his goat, and Leythos is completely incapable of
ignoring the bait Kurt leaves for him.

I am as guilty of this as any, and I take full
responsibility for my actions.

No, you don't take real responsibility. If you really think that all
Kurt does is put on a slight-of-hand show, then you wouldn't get
involved in it at all. It is obvious that you are a victim of his
rational agreements, and you didn't like it when he explained why you
were mistaken, so know you are trying to get him back by attacking
him, because you cannot rationally and logically show that is opinion
is incorrect.

My only defense is that, being considerably
more intelligent than you,

Now that is just sad that you feel the need to express your belief
that you are more intelligent than Kurt, rather than letting your
words speak for you.

I feel some deep-seeded need to speak out against
the blatant, glaring inaccuracies you consistently introduce into this
forum.

Yet you have done nothing to explain that anything he has said is
inaccurate. He gave you the opportunity to do just that, but all you
did was continue the character assassination as he put it.

I have a great deal of trouble leaving stupidity alone,

From this diatribe about Kurt, it would seem that you are just lonely.

especially
your particular brand of it, which seems to generate some depraved form of
loyalty in those of similarly deficient mind.

So anyone that believes that the licensor is not the final authority
when it comes to the legal interpretation of its license is a
deficient mind? As Kurt always points out that would include IBM, as
that is why they aren't settling with SCO over its interpretation of
the UNIX license, because it is the courts that are the final
authority.

That is the foundation of Contract Law in the US. That's why we have
courts to settle contract disputes. Contract law would be totally
unnecessary, if the contractor is the final authority in interpreting
its own contracts.

I hate to see this inanity
breed; you are a breeder and nothing else.

You have yet to demonstrate that anything Kurt advocates is an
"inanity," though he does breed the wrath of those that he has shown
to be irrational purveyors of disinformation.

The tactics you employ to ensure the survival of this inanity are so
unrefined, so transparently obvious, that it pains me even to read them.

Are you confessing to be a masochist?

You don't listen to those with opposing viewpoints; you don't pay attention
to debate.

Now you are just prevaricating. Kurt demonstrates that he listens to
his opposition, and is very deliberate in explaining why they are
mistaken. This thread is the perfect storm of his style. He didn't
have to post the System Builders License. All he really needed to do
was challenge Leythos to quote where the System Builders License
states that upgrading the motherboard invalidates the OEM Windows XP
license, but understanding that Leythos would avoid doing that from
prior experience, Kurt demonstrated why Leythos was just spreading
disinformation, before he called Leythos out on his irrational opinion
about it.

You close your eyes, you close your mind, and then you call
people names. *You call them names!*

Yes he does. After he explains and demonstrates why they have earned
the names he calls them. It is just his way to push their buttons.
And it seems to work every time, because instead of focusing on what
Kurt has shown where their opinions are deficient, inaccurate, or just
plain incorrect, his opposition just focuses on the names they have
been called by him, which to any casual observer further demonstrates
how irrational his opposition really is.

The absurdity of this is obviously
lost on you - as it is lost on all teenagers who call their schoolmates
names -

If all he did was call them names, then you would be correct, but that
is not Kurt's style. Kurt explains his opinions, dismembers the
opinions of his opposition, and then entertains his audience. Kurt
makes this group interesting to lurk.

but to those of us with I.Q's higher than 60, this is so patently
ridiculous as to warrant some concern on our part.

And that concern is misplaced. What should concern you is your and
the rest of his opposition's obsession with him, and his style, rather
than focusing on his rational opinion.

You have all the
intelligence of a sea anemone, Kurt, and Darwinism suggests that someday
soon, someone of superior intellect (most anyone) is going to come along and
remove you from the food chain. We're concerned, my boy. We're concerned
for your well-being.

If you really had done a search of his posts in this group, then
you'll see that no one with a superior intellect has been able to
remove him from this food chain. While he might not be the brightest
bulb in the bunch, when it comes to his arguments on Microsoft's
Licensing, no one has been able to come close to actually dispelling
his opinions about it.

So: You call them names, you insult them, and when they respond to your
insults, you insult them some more for having stooped to your level (a level
on which, I might add, you have already very clearly established yourself).

No. He ridicules them for only acknowledging the name-calling at the
expense of supporting their own opinions, or trying to dispel his
opinions.

You are a one-trick pony, Kurt.

If he was, then he wouldn't have lasted as long here as he has.

You don't know what you're talking about
when it comes to copyright law,

That is patently untrue. His opinion on fair use is the absolute
reality of the situation according to the existing legal precedent.

your computer skills are clearly lacking,

And what evidence do you have to support that opinion?

and as for pure human interaction, I've seen blind, rabid, lame dogs in heat
with better people skills.

Is Kurt abrasive? Yes. He is deliberately so, especially with those
that he sees it would affect, but I've also seen him have pleasant
conversations and go out of his way to help people.

I tell you this not because I think you're an
imbecile (though, clearly, you are), but because if you want to hold out
hope of ever getting your point across - about anything - you should really
start working on your communication skills.

Those that he respects, he shows his respect. Those that he doesn't
respect he shows his utter contempt of them. With Kurt, he wears what
he thinks about you on his sleeve.

I shouldn't even need to
mention that the most ubiquitous proclamation in all your quasi-arguments is
"LOL," but it just goes to further my point.

If that was the sum total of his posts, you would be correct, but that
is hardly the sum total of his posts.

You can't formulate a rational
thought to save your life, and so you just go with the least common
denominator, namely, a hackneyed internet abbreviation, rampant verbal
abuse, lame-duck opinions,

That would be your own unsupported opinion.

and microscopic genitalia. Whoops! Did I say
that?

Yes, you did. And it is as totally unsupported as the rest of your
Kurt diatribe.

Let me summarize.

You have been totally affected by Kurt. You and the rest of his
opposition cannot disparage his opinions reasonably, so all you have
left is to irrationally disparage his character.

You know nothing about any of the topics on which you
post; your posts consist almost entirely of name-calling and fabricated,
delusional arguments; you preface each one of those posts with "LOL"; and
all of your posts are so twisted, irrational, and incoherent as to warrant
psychiatric evaluation.

Now that is funny! After you spend a whole post showing how
irrational you are when it comes to Kurt, it is you that would seem to
warrant the psychiatric evaluation.

What are you *doing* here, Kurt? Shouldn't you be
in a bayou somewhere, strumming a banjo and waiting for your sister to get
home? I think there's a sow out back that needs your attention.

Since you are the one that is doing all this squealing over Kurt, are
you the sow that needs his attention?

I know this post will probably get edited out, and that's fine. I only hope
you get to it before Mike does, because it will be the last time you'll hear
from me - I'm finally going to filter you out of my life.

Too bad that you didn't do that before you exposed yourself to be
totally consumed with fascination with Kurt.

For a while I
found your posts sort of entertaining in a sick, masochistic way -

So you were confessing to your masochistic tendencies before.

I almost
enjoyed discovering that your idiocy and your depravity plumbed deeper
depths than I previously imagined even existed. Now, however, I've grown
sick of your rants, your rambling, and your rampant bestiality.

And what is this fascination of yours with bestially all about? Is
this another confession about your sexual depravity?

Notice,
though, that I've managed to lay bare the cold, hard truth about you in this
post without ever having uttered a curse word. As they say, profanity is
the result of a deficient mind attempting to express itself forcefully, and
your mind is about as deficient as they come.



Enjoy the sheep!

And your obsession with bestiality is the result of your depraved mind
attempting to express itself forcefully into the open air of day.

</delurk>

 

[Ira Potell]

After reading all the posts I really didn't find any that addressed the
topic. This thread has become nothing but a pissing contest with no regard
for anyone who is serious.

--
Best wishes,
Ira
:> While this is your right, it is not completely honest. Microsoft would
: > not be in business at all if it were not for its customers. In fact,
: > Microsoft is in business for its customers, I hope. If not, they really
: > need to get a new mindset.
:
: LOL! Microsoft in business *for* its customers! Wait, wait, until
: I wipe the tears of laughter out of my eyes.

 

[Jack Cosway]

Well said Lurker!

Your response to Linda B is thoughtfully accurate!

Jack.

 

[Don Burnette]

kurttrail wrote:

You should have just stayed quiet, and not replied at all, because
every time you reply to me you just look more foolish and irrational.

Pot meet Kettle.

 

[Don Burnette]

LOL! I am? I don't always have the last word.

Last word is yours, if it is so important to you, as I am done with
the character assasinations that is totally off-topic as per OEM XP.

WTG Linda!

 

[Don Burnette]

I will take this chance to state the obvious, and I believe that the
only reason you might relinquish the final word in this post -- if in
fact you do so -- is to try to save some face. Just for the record,
this is the second time you've "offered" me the final word (which is
completely illogical, but I don't expect you to understand that).
You have *taken* it on countless occasions. It is clearly your
foremost objective, and anyone who is wondering if that's true should
just run a query on your nick.



Time and time again -- and this is shown by the written record here;
anyone can go and check - you have shown that your ultimate goal is
not to help people, nor to participate in rational discussion, but to
espouse your own ideas and shoot down anyone you see as opposing you,
regardless of how correct they invariably are, and how astonishingly
mistaken you are. You fabricate foundations for these absurd
arguments seemingly out of thin air. Such prestidigitation is not
well suited to a forum ostensibly devoted to the advancement of
knowledge; you serve only to bring the participants down to your
level. I am as guilty of this as any, and I take full responsibility
for my actions. My only defense is that, being considerably more
intelligent than you, I feel some deep-seeded need to speak out
against the blatant, glaring inaccuracies you consistently introduce
into this forum. I have a great deal of trouble leaving stupidity
alone, especially your particular brand of it, which seems to
generate some depraved form of loyalty in those of similarly
deficient mind. I hate to see this inanity breed; you are a breeder
and nothing else.



The tactics you employ to ensure the survival of this inanity are so
unrefined, so transparently obvious, that it pains me even to read
them. You don't listen to those with opposing viewpoints; you don't
pay attention to debate. You close your eyes, you close your mind,
and then you call people names. *You call them names!* The
absurdity of this is obviously lost on you - as it is lost on all
teenagers who call their schoolmates names - but to those of us with
I.Q's higher than 60, this is so patently ridiculous as to warrant
some concern on our part. You have all the intelligence of a sea
anemone, Kurt, and Darwinism suggests that someday soon, someone of
superior intellect (most anyone) is going to come along and remove
you from the food chain. We're concerned, my boy. We're concerned
for your well-being.



So: You call them names, you insult them, and when they respond to
your insults, you insult them some more for having stooped to your
level (a level on which, I might add, you have already very clearly
established yourself). You are a one-trick pony, Kurt. You don't
know what you're talking about when it comes to copyright law, your
computer skills are clearly lacking, and as for pure human
interaction, I've seen blind, rabid, lame dogs in heat with better
people skills. I tell you this not because I think you're an
imbecile (though, clearly, you are), but because if you want to hold
out hope of ever getting your point across - about anything - you
should really start working on your communication skills. I
shouldn't even need to mention that the most ubiquitous proclamation
in all your quasi-arguments is "LOL," but it just goes to further my
point. You can't formulate a rational thought to save your life, and
so you just go with the least common denominator, namely, a hackneyed
internet abbreviation, rampant verbal abuse, lame-duck opinions, and
microscopic genitalia. Whoops! Did I say that?



Let me summarize. You know nothing about any of the topics on which
you post; your posts consist almost entirely of name-calling and
fabricated, delusional arguments; you preface each one of those posts
with "LOL"; and all of your posts are so twisted, irrational, and
incoherent as to warrant psychiatric evaluation. What are you
*doing* here, Kurt? Shouldn't you be in a bayou somewhere, strumming
a banjo and waiting for your sister to get home? I think there's a
sow out back that needs your attention.



I know this post will probably get edited out, and that's fine. I
only hope you get to it before Mike does, because it will be the last
time you'll hear from me - I'm finally going to filter you out of my
life. For a while I found your posts sort of entertaining in a sick,
masochistic way - I almost enjoyed discovering that your idiocy and
your depravity plumbed deeper depths than I previously imagined even
existed. Now, however, I've grown sick of your rants, your rambling,
and your rampant bestiality. Notice, though, that I've managed to
lay bare the cold, hard truth about you in this post without ever
having uttered a curse word. As they say, profanity is the result of
a deficient mind attempting to express itself forcefully, and your
mind is about as deficient as they come.



Enjoy the sheep!

Wow, Linda, my hat is off to you.

Excellent post, and very much the truth.

Great job!

 

[Don Burnette]

LOL! I am? I don't always have the last word.

Last word is yours, if it is so important to you, as I am done with
the character assasinations that is totally off-topic as per OEM XP.

LOL,, you, done, with character assasinations?

Man, you live and breath character assasinations!!

Hypocrite is right!

 

[kurttrail]

After reading all the posts I really didn't find any that addressed
the topic.

There were a few. And even I had one that addressed the concerns of the
OP.

This thread has become nothing but a pissing contest with
no regard for anyone who is serious.

And I suppose you would be the only one who is serious? I noticed that
you have not responded to the topic of the OP either.

May be time to take that stick out of your ass for a while. It seems to
have hit grey matter.

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

 

[Paul Knudsen]

After reading all the posts I really didn't find any that addressed the
topic. This thread has become nothing but a pissing contest with no regard
for anyone who is serious.

OK, serious: The XP upgrade has everything on it. You just have to
prove you own an older version of Windows. You do that by inserting
the CD when asked. So It'll save you some money. Serious enough for
you?

 

[kurttrail]

kurttrail wrote:






Pot meet Kettle.

If I look irrational to you, that just confirms to me how rational I
appear to those that actually have a mind of their own.

Thanks!

--
Peace!
Kurt
Self-anointed Moderator
microscum.pubic.windowsexp.gonorrhea
http://microscum.com/mscommunity
"Trustworthy Computing" is only another example of an Oxymoron!
"Produkt-Aktivierung macht frei"

 

[Leythos]

I will take this chance to state the obvious, and I believe that the only
reason you might relinquish the final word in this post -- if in fact you do
so -- is to try to save some face. Just for the record, this is the second
time you've "offered" me the final word (which is completely illogical, but
I don't expect you to understand that). You have *taken* it on countless
occasions. It is clearly your foremost objective, and anyone who is
wondering if that's true should just run a query on your nick.

Time and time again -- and this is shown by the written record here; anyone
can go and check - you have shown that your ultimate goal is not to help
people, nor to participate in rational discussion, but to espouse your own
ideas and shoot down anyone you see as opposing you, regardless of how
correct they invariably are, and how astonishingly mistaken you are. You
fabricate foundations for these absurd arguments seemingly out of thin air.
Such prestidigitation is not well suited to a forum ostensibly devoted to
the advancement of knowledge; you serve only to bring the participants down
to your level. I am as guilty of this as any, and I take full
responsibility for my actions. My only defense is that, being considerably
more intelligent than you, I feel some deep-seeded need to speak out against
the blatant, glaring inaccuracies you consistently introduce into this
forum. I have a great deal of trouble leaving stupidity alone, especially
your particular brand of it, which seems to generate some depraved form of
loyalty in those of similarly deficient mind. I hate to see this inanity
breed; you are a breeder and nothing else.

The tactics you employ to ensure the survival of this inanity are so
unrefined, so transparently obvious, that it pains me even to read them.
You don't listen to those with opposing viewpoints; you don't pay attention
to debate. You close your eyes, you close your mind, and then you call
people names. *You call them names!* The absurdity of this is obviously
lost on you - as it is lost on all teenagers who call their schoolmates
names - but to those of us with I.Q's higher than 60, this is so patently
ridiculous as to warrant some concern on our part. You have all the
intelligence of a sea anemone, Kurt, and Darwinism suggests that someday
soon, someone of superior intellect (most anyone) is going to come along and
remove you from the food chain. We're concerned, my boy. We're concerned
for your well-being.

So: You call them names, you insult them, and when they respond to your
insults, you insult them some more for having stooped to your level (a level
on which, I might add, you have already very clearly established yourself).
You are a one-trick pony, Kurt. You don't know what you're talking about
when it comes to copyright law, your computer skills are clearly lacking,
and as for pure human interaction, I've seen blind, rabid, lame dogs in heat
with better people skills. I tell you this not because I think you're an
imbecile (though, clearly, you are), but because if you want to hold out
hope of ever getting your point across - about anything - you should really
start working on your communication skills. I shouldn't even need to
mention that the most ubiquitous proclamation in all your quasi-arguments is
"LOL," but it just goes to further my point. You can't formulate a rational
thought to save your life, and so you just go with the least common
denominator, namely, a hackneyed internet abbreviation, rampant verbal
abuse, lame-duck opinions, and microscopic genitalia. Whoops! Did I say
that?

Let me summarize. You know nothing about any of the topics on which you
post; your posts consist almost entirely of name-calling and fabricated,
delusional arguments; you preface each one of those posts with "LOL"; and
all of your posts are so twisted, irrational, and incoherent as to warrant
psychiatric evaluation. What are you *doing* here, Kurt? Shouldn't you be
in a bayou somewhere, strumming a banjo and waiting for your sister to get
home? I think there's a sow out back that needs your attention.

I know this post will probably get edited out, and that's fine. I only hope
you get to it before Mike does, because it will be the last time you'll hear
from me - I'm finally going to filter you out of my life. For a while I
found your posts sort of entertaining in a sick, masochistic way - I almost
enjoyed discovering that your idiocy and your depravity plumbed deeper
depths than I previously imagined even existed. Now, however, I've grown
sick of your rants, your rambling, and your rampant bestiality. Notice,
though, that I've managed to lay bare the cold, hard truth about you in this
post without ever having uttered a curse word. As they say, profanity is
the result of a deficient mind attempting to express itself forcefully, and
your mind is about as deficient as they come.

Enjoy the sheep!

Very well said Linda - in fact, it was so well put that I actually removed
the XNA from my reply this time. If it's not to immature of me I would
like to say "You GO Girl!".

 

[Alias]

Read Lurker's response to Linda's lying, patronizing and insulting post.
Course, being as that's the kind of post you spew so constantly, it's no
wonder you give it a "You GO, Girl".

Alias

 

[Leythos]

Read Lurker's response to Linda's lying, patronizing and insulting post.
Course, being as that's the kind of post you spew so constantly, it's no
wonder you give it a "You GO, Girl".

And you seem to think I care about anyone replying to her post? I gave her
a "You GO Girl" because "I" liked it, not because I wanted anyone else's
approval to like it. Why don't you just worry about your own posts for a
while.

 

[Alias]

And you seem to think I care about anyone replying to her post? I gave her
a "You GO Girl" because "I" liked it, not because I wanted anyone else's
approval to like it. Why don't you just worry about your own posts for a
while.

I know you liked it and I stated why. You just proved my point. I am sure
you didn't read Lurker's response because it blew Linda's lying, patronizing
and insulting post right out of the water.

I will worry about whoever's post that the mood strikes me to worry about.

Alias

 

[Leythos]

I know you liked it and I stated why. You just proved my point. I am sure
you didn't read Lurker's response because it blew Linda's lying, patronizing
and insulting post right out of the water.

I will worry about whoever's post that the mood strikes me to worry about.

You know, just for you, since I like you, I looked for Lurkers post, but
it doesn't seem to be on the Usenet server I use. Lurker is not in my kill
file, I just checked, but it's not here. I did see a couple very positive
responses to Linda's post, but yours is the only non-positive response
I've seen to it (and I didn't say yours was negative).

Lurker can disagree with Linda, heck, anyone can disagree with anyone, but
I think that Linda properly captured the real essence of Kurt, and maybe a
couple others. Her description of his behavior is right on the ball
(meaning 100% correct for anyone not understanding American slang).