J
Jeff W
Hi - I'm planning a win98SE -> XP migration. ..I'm finding that there
are a number of ways to do it, like
1) wipe the disk clean and start over - great if you don't have much on
it, or are out-of-work and have time on your hands 8-}
2) upgrade - some people say this is risky. One point that was made to
me is that you never know if an APP is using its old DLLs or its new
ones (unless you re-install it, in which case you might as well remove
the risk of a 'dirty' windows directory and....(see #3)
3) Install XP to a different partition than WIN98SE (maybe to its own
dedicated partition?).
You use the migration wizard to move all your registry settings and
app-specific files stored in the windows directory. All your APPs and
data files stay where they are. Small Apps, shareware, etc, mostly
probably run Ok without re-install. For everything else you just have
to do a re-install in place.
I'm thinking that for time and quality of results this is a good
compromise. Since the XP install is clean it doesn't risk the legacy
clutter of an upgrade, but you eliminate most of the time and effort
involved in re-building your system, as re-installing an app is much
faster than the first time. As a bonus, your XP partition is separated
from everything else, which means you don't have to worry about your
backup strategy being complete and bit-accurate (e.g., partition image)
except for a small partition. Maybe that partition contains ONLY XP...
oh yes, and if you do want to do dual-boot - it comes for free.
fatal flaw? make sense?
thanks for your comments.
/j
Ps - if you do like this scheme - can anyone comment on whether it's
required, or safer, or easier, to make the XP partition the first one on
the drive - a bit harder to do for legacy systems admittedly.
Supposedly XP doesn't care, I think any partition can be marked as
active (or can it?)
are a number of ways to do it, like
1) wipe the disk clean and start over - great if you don't have much on
it, or are out-of-work and have time on your hands 8-}
2) upgrade - some people say this is risky. One point that was made to
me is that you never know if an APP is using its old DLLs or its new
ones (unless you re-install it, in which case you might as well remove
the risk of a 'dirty' windows directory and....(see #3)
3) Install XP to a different partition than WIN98SE (maybe to its own
dedicated partition?).
You use the migration wizard to move all your registry settings and
app-specific files stored in the windows directory. All your APPs and
data files stay where they are. Small Apps, shareware, etc, mostly
probably run Ok without re-install. For everything else you just have
to do a re-install in place.
I'm thinking that for time and quality of results this is a good
compromise. Since the XP install is clean it doesn't risk the legacy
clutter of an upgrade, but you eliminate most of the time and effort
involved in re-building your system, as re-installing an app is much
faster than the first time. As a bonus, your XP partition is separated
from everything else, which means you don't have to worry about your
backup strategy being complete and bit-accurate (e.g., partition image)
except for a small partition. Maybe that partition contains ONLY XP...
oh yes, and if you do want to do dual-boot - it comes for free.
fatal flaw? make sense?
thanks for your comments.
/j
Ps - if you do like this scheme - can anyone comment on whether it's
required, or safer, or easier, to make the XP partition the first one on
the drive - a bit harder to do for legacy systems admittedly.
Supposedly XP doesn't care, I think any partition can be marked as
active (or can it?)