[Update] Seamonkey 1.0.3

[Laurie]

Seamonkey 1.0.3 provides :-

* Improved stability
* Several security fixes
* A bug was introduced in SeaMonkey 1.0.2 that sometimes caused the
URL bar to stop working properly when switching tabs. This has been
fixed. (Bug 332874)
* If you have more bookmarks on your personal toolbar than there is
space for, the ">>" overflow icon will now display more reliably (Bug
338803)
* If you choose to update SeaMonkey when it notifies you that an
update is available, the update page will load in a more useful browser
window (with navigation buttons and toolbars) (Bug 334903)


Available for download at :-

http://www.mozilla.org/projects/seamonkey/releases/

Laurie

 

[John Jay Smith]

what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads faster than
firefox!

Firefox primary goal was to be different from mozilla in that it would be
lite and speedy.. but slowly it became monsterous than its ancestor!

 

[k]

| what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads faster than
| firefox!
|
| Firefox primary goal was to be different from mozilla in that it would be
| lite and speedy.. but slowly it became monsterous than its ancestor!


hahahaha - true

fortunately there's Opera

k

 

[MyName]

Fortunately there is K-Meleon, which has become what
Firefox was supposed to be.

It has always been the fastest.

 

[S.O. Meone]

hahahaha - true

fortunately there's Opera

Fortunately there is K-Meleon, which has become what Firefox was
supposed to be.

S.O. Meone

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads faster
than firefox!

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox loads a
little faster.

 

[Kerodo]

Fortunately there is K-Meleon, which has become what Firefox was
supposed to be.

S.O. Meone

Yep, K-Meleon 1.0 is really great...

 

[John Jay Smith]

how many extensions?

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox loads a
little faster.

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

how many extensions?

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to conclude
that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and "monsterous"[sic], were you? I
thought you had mostly given up trolling.

 

[John Jay Smith]

thought you had mostly given up trolling.

Now I am absolutly sure of it.

You Corliss and Al Klein are the SAME PERSON!

how many extensions?

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to conclude
that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and "monsterous"[sic], were you? I
thought you had mostly given up trolling.

 

[arachnid]

It has always been the fastest.

Lynx is faster.

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

<
what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads
faster than firefox!

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox
loads a little faster.

how many extensions?

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to
conclude that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and
"monsterous"[sic], were you? I thought you had mostly given up
trolling.

Now I am absolutly sure of it.

You Corliss and Al Klein are the SAME PERSON!

That didn't answer the question. Did you really use extensions' load
times as the basis for your inflammatory remarks? If so, why other
than to troll?

 

[S.O. Meone]

Lynx is faster.

And the cheetah beats them all. Lynx is not a serious competitor. Far
too many limitations and far too few features.

S.O. Meone

 

[arachnid]

And the cheetah beats them all. Lynx is not a serious competitor. Far
too many limitations and far too few features.

Speak for yourself. It's small, snappy even on a 20K dial-up, and pretty
much ad-proof. I get through the morning headlines much faster with Lynx
than with any GUI browser.

 

[John Jay Smith]

Hello Q...

Did you really use extensions' load
times as the basis for your inflammatory remarks?

no, of course not.. I was just asking if you had extensions loaded.. thats
all...

I am not truly insulting firefox.. its just getting too slow for my taste...
I still use it, and it is better than opera and seamonkey in my opinion.
For my main browser I use AvantBrowser that is a good shell for IE.

<
<
what a disgrace!!!... Seamonkey (that was mozilla) loads
faster than firefox!

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox
loads a little faster.

how many extensions?

None, of course. You weren't using extensions' load times to
conclude that Firefox itself is "a disgace" and
"monsterous"[sic], were you? I thought you had mostly given up
trolling.

Now I am absolutly sure of it.

You Corliss and Al Klein are the SAME PERSON!

That didn't answer the question. Did you really use extensions' load
times as the basis for your inflammatory remarks? If so, why other
than to troll?

 

[ms]

Not on my machine. The difference isn't much, but Firefox loads a
little faster.

Awhile ago, in a thread I compared FF load times with you, I was on W98SE
on a P166, FF 1.02 loaded in about 3 seconds or less, now on W2K, 2.5 GHZ,
FF 1.501 loads in 1 second or less, PrefBar is only extension.

Mike Sa

 

[John Jay Smith]

clean your prefetch

Awhile ago, in a thread I compared FF load times with you, I was on W98SE
on a P166, FF 1.02 loaded in about 3 seconds or less, now on W2K, 2.5 GHZ,
FF 1.501 loads in 1 second or less, PrefBar is only extension.

Mike Sa

 

[John Jay Smith]

oh on win2k???

well ill post back something tomorrow... so you can see what I mean

 

[=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BBQ=AB?=]

Awhile ago, in a thread I compared FF load times with you, I was
on W98SE on a P166, FF 1.02 loaded in about 3 seconds or less, now
on W2K, 2.5 GHZ, FF 1.501 loads in 1 second or less, PrefBar is
only extension.

1.5.0.5 load for me in about 1.5 seconds, with no extensions, WinXP SP2
home, 2133MHz.

 

[ms]

oh on win2k???

well ill post back something tomorrow... so you can see what I mean

What are you talking about? Give an example.

Mike Sa