No, I do not work for Microsoft. I also do not try and
interpret the EULA, but rely on the specific language therein.
If you install Windows XP twice, I doubt you'll be able to
activate the second installation since it was already activated
the first time you installed it.
Questions regarding the EULA should be addressed to:
Microsoft Corporate and Legal Affairs
Microsoft Corporation
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052-6399
USA
--
Carey Frisch
Microsoft MVP
Windows XP - Shell/User
Be Smart! Protect your PC!
http://www.microsoft.com/security/protect/
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
| As you say:
|
| "> "You may install, use, access, display and run one copy
| > of the Software on a single computer....""
|
|
|
| Installing the same OS on one single PC over and over again still falls
| within the spirit of the copyright law given that only one instance of the
| OS can be running/used at any one time. I have done it with a XP OEM (from
| Dell) and it works and it does not even ask for a CD key and is activated by
| default.
|
|
|
| I don't claim to know everything about the letter of the copyright law, but
| I cannot see how this will infringe on MS copyright in any way. More over, I
| don't think that any court would ever convict any one given that the user is
| not cheating MS out of a license. Do you work for MS? I know that MS is good
| in promoting this kind of fear, but I just don't see it having any legal
| basis. Maybe MS should learn to live within the legal boundaries itself
| first, and then, maybe, it can point fingers at others. The bottom line is
| that having a legally licensed copy of the OS on one single PC is what
| really matters! After all, for all practical purposes it is just one
| instance of the OS running at any one time. It requires a reboot to switch
| OS which ensures that a single OS license cannot be used multiple instances
| concurrently. This is very different from making/installing the same OS
| license on more then one PC, which then allows you to run multiple instances
| of the same OS concurrently and having the benefit of multiple PCs/OSs
| running concurrently which does run against the letter & spirit of the
| copyright law!
|
|
|
| Now, why would some one do multiple installs of an OS in the first place?
| The reason I tried it is because XP requires games to run with administrator
| privileges and they have a nasty tendency to corrupt the OS, on occasion,
| and keeping my kids from doing nasty things to the OS. This way I can keep
| my apps & internet access separate from games - it does require a reboot to
| switch though. The only part I'm still working on is the permissions so that
| I can limit cross partition access to prevent the OS on the current portions
| from accessing the partition of the other boot partitions.