Long thread this... might become a universe in its own right...
Filters are not standard on most PCs for 2 reasons
o Impact on airflow
---- typical axial flow fan has few 10s Pa pressure
---- typical airflow filter has few 10s Pa resistance
---- net airflow with filter can easily end up at 20%, even 0%
---- so a) more fans (more cost) or b) faster fas or c) larger fans (more cost)
o Centralised cooling
---- cheaper to filter all the air entering an environment than per server
---- hence Coloco air is centrally filtered re a) dust b) humidity re static
---- humans performing server service calls routinely affect other servers
---- so adding per-server filter replacement magnifies that risk needlessly
With racks or similar high density equipment, filters are even more of a
problem. A typical 1U rack can have a static airflow resistance of 0.4" H2O,
whereas even 40x28mm 40dB(A) 15cfm 21k-rpm screamers lose 60% of their
airflow at that resistance. Proposed 1U cases circa 2004 reached 0.7" H2O,
which with conventional fans would have exceeded their stall (0cfm) airflow.
Hence proposed 50x40x38 dual-motor concentric fan 56dB(A) screamers. Ah,
machine rooms are going to be such a pleasant place. Bring back IBM 360s.
Consideration of dust is important.
o Increasingly PCs are using skived copper heatsink
---- laptops, desktops & servers
o Such heatsinks have very high density fins
---- little air spacing leaves little c/sectional area for airflow
---- so clogging is easy & additional clogged has a structure to build on
o Laptops can end up with fans running 100% after 6 months
---- desktops or servers are not immune from this problem
So using a proper dust blower is beneficial - heatsinks DO clog up, and
that will elevate temperatures. Traditional broad-spaced alloy heatsinks
are less affected by clogging, but high density fins will clog easily.
Filter media comes in several grades
o Light spun polyester media
---- merely stops blade dusting & limit HSF buildup
---- resistance is low, but clogging often easy due to small media depth
o Denser foam or spun media
---- actually attempt to stop quite fine particles
---- resistance is very high, rendering axial fans inappropriate
o HEPA material
---- typically spun glass-fibre with pre-filter, trap 0.3 micron
---- resistance necessitates high-speed, high-wattage radial fans
Where filtering is used in industry you will find radial blowers, offering
low airflow, high noise - but extremely high pressure to overcome resistance.
The benefit of water cooling is ability to relocate the thermal input from the
local air (that you sit in) to some remote air (that someone else suffers

This can also relocate noise, but introduces some noise factors in itself.
It's unknown how future cooling will develop:
o Limit per CPU is 150W -- dual cores allow alternate thermal loads
---- since the real limit is thermal density and not so much headline figure
o Liquid cooling has benefits -- Intel pilotted some designs
---- PCs re-invent the wheel already solved by Mainframes
---- however liquid cooling isn't popular (many places have removed it)
o Liquid cooling is attractive re density
---- some eco benefit re surplus heat into heating a building
---- main benefit is allowing more coloco/data/cpu per square foot
---- example is the Almaden development of the liquid cooled ice cube
---- altho that is as much about more smart-automated super-dbase-admin
Cooligy have onchip liquid cooling, and progressively we will see a more
micro-management of the thermal load. At least P-M has moved us back to
the P3 in order to go forward at least in more thermally efficient CPUs.
Filter resistance depends on airflow velocity:
o Faster you push air through a filter, the greater the filter resistance
o So enlarging the filter to lower velocity has direct airflow benefits
PC cases are somewhat difficult to filter in this regard:
o Ideally you want a broad space to fit air intake fans & a large filter
o Conversely PCs tend to require several front removeable media bays
If dust etc is a primary concern you need to rehouse a (several) PC(s)
Easiest solution is a large flight case with broad front filter & fans,
PC carcass inside, with any removeable media fed by Firewire/USB.
This has an economy of scale with the more PCs you fit inside it.
For an environment to be filtered...
o All intake air must be drawn through the filter
o Typically this necessitates the use of intake fans on the filter
---- ensuring a positive case pressure to prevent unfiltered air intake
o Conversely exhaust fans could be used if packaging necessitates
---- the case would need to be sealed so ensure air intake via the filter
---- since this is more costly this solution is not common
o Both intake & exhaust fans may be used re additive in pressure
---- intake fans should have a net higher airflow than exhaust
Overall PC filtering is perhaps best done as heatsink maintenance.
That does involve downtime & risk to components, whereas a filter
allows uninterrupted operation - until clogged & overheating ensues.
Laptops are most critical re clogging, and commonly ignored
until someone notices the fan continually roaring at high speed.
You can use vortex cooling to avoid dust, but it's a bit noisy
Remember to keep to like metals (or anti-corrosive treatment) if using
water cooling, and also mould etc inhibitors re various bugs etc. Water
cooling is useful with multi-1U servers in a SOHO environment, where
you as much need to dump the heat outside as the bulk noise level.